Cargando…

Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’

BACKGROUND: The quality standards of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care require monitoring of the satisfaction of patient’s relatives with respect to care. Currently, no suitable instrument is available in the Netherlands to measure this. This study describes the development and psychometric evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rensen, Ans, van Mol, Margo M., Menheere, Ilse, Nijkamp, Marjan D., Verhoogt, Ellen, Maris, Bea, Manders, Willeke, Vloet, Lilian, Verharen, Lisbeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1975-4
_version_ 1782499325357588480
author Rensen, Ans
van Mol, Margo M.
Menheere, Ilse
Nijkamp, Marjan D.
Verhoogt, Ellen
Maris, Bea
Manders, Willeke
Vloet, Lilian
Verharen, Lisbeth
author_facet Rensen, Ans
van Mol, Margo M.
Menheere, Ilse
Nijkamp, Marjan D.
Verhoogt, Ellen
Maris, Bea
Manders, Willeke
Vloet, Lilian
Verharen, Lisbeth
author_sort Rensen, Ans
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality standards of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care require monitoring of the satisfaction of patient’s relatives with respect to care. Currently, no suitable instrument is available in the Netherlands to measure this. This study describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire-based Consumer Quality Index ‘Relatives in Intensive Care Unit’ (CQI ‘R-ICU’). The CQI ‘R-ICU’ measures the perceived quality of care from the perspective of patients’ relatives, and identifies aspects of care that need improvement. METHODS: The CQI ‘R-ICU’ was developed using a mixed method design. Items were based on quality of care aspects from earlier studies and from focus group interviews with patients’ relatives. The time period for the data collection of the psychometric evaluation was from October 2011 until July 2012. Relatives of adult intensive care patients in one university hospital and five general hospitals in the Netherlands were approached to participate. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, inter-item analysis, and factor analysis. RESULTS: Twelve aspects were noted as being indicators of quality of care, and were subsequently selected for the questionnaire’s vocabulary. The response rate of patients’ relatives was 81% (n = 455). Quality of care was represented by two clusters, each showing a high reliability: ‘Communication’ (α = .80) and ‘Participation’ (α = .84). Relatives ranked the following aspects for quality of care as most important: no conflicting information, information from doctors and nurses is comprehensive, and health professionals take patients’ relatives seriously. The least important care aspects were: need for contact with peers, nuisance, and contact with a spiritual counsellor. Aspects that needed the most urgent improvement (highest quality improvement scores) were: information about how relatives can contribute to the care of the patient, information about the use of meal-facilities in the hospital, and involvement in decision-making on the medical treatment of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The CQI ‘R-ICU’ evaluates quality of care from the perspective of relatives of intensive care patients and provides practical information for quality assurance and improvement programs. The development and psychometric evaluation of the CQI ‘R-ICU’ led to a draft questionnaire, sufficient to justify further research into the reliability, validity, and the discriminative power of the questionnaire. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1975-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5260020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52600202017-01-26 Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’ Rensen, Ans van Mol, Margo M. Menheere, Ilse Nijkamp, Marjan D. Verhoogt, Ellen Maris, Bea Manders, Willeke Vloet, Lilian Verharen, Lisbeth BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The quality standards of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care require monitoring of the satisfaction of patient’s relatives with respect to care. Currently, no suitable instrument is available in the Netherlands to measure this. This study describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire-based Consumer Quality Index ‘Relatives in Intensive Care Unit’ (CQI ‘R-ICU’). The CQI ‘R-ICU’ measures the perceived quality of care from the perspective of patients’ relatives, and identifies aspects of care that need improvement. METHODS: The CQI ‘R-ICU’ was developed using a mixed method design. Items were based on quality of care aspects from earlier studies and from focus group interviews with patients’ relatives. The time period for the data collection of the psychometric evaluation was from October 2011 until July 2012. Relatives of adult intensive care patients in one university hospital and five general hospitals in the Netherlands were approached to participate. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, inter-item analysis, and factor analysis. RESULTS: Twelve aspects were noted as being indicators of quality of care, and were subsequently selected for the questionnaire’s vocabulary. The response rate of patients’ relatives was 81% (n = 455). Quality of care was represented by two clusters, each showing a high reliability: ‘Communication’ (α = .80) and ‘Participation’ (α = .84). Relatives ranked the following aspects for quality of care as most important: no conflicting information, information from doctors and nurses is comprehensive, and health professionals take patients’ relatives seriously. The least important care aspects were: need for contact with peers, nuisance, and contact with a spiritual counsellor. Aspects that needed the most urgent improvement (highest quality improvement scores) were: information about how relatives can contribute to the care of the patient, information about the use of meal-facilities in the hospital, and involvement in decision-making on the medical treatment of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The CQI ‘R-ICU’ evaluates quality of care from the perspective of relatives of intensive care patients and provides practical information for quality assurance and improvement programs. The development and psychometric evaluation of the CQI ‘R-ICU’ led to a draft questionnaire, sufficient to justify further research into the reliability, validity, and the discriminative power of the questionnaire. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1975-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5260020/ /pubmed/28118840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1975-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rensen, Ans
van Mol, Margo M.
Menheere, Ilse
Nijkamp, Marjan D.
Verhoogt, Ellen
Maris, Bea
Manders, Willeke
Vloet, Lilian
Verharen, Lisbeth
Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’
title Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’
title_full Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’
title_fullStr Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’
title_full_unstemmed Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’
title_short Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘R-ICU’
title_sort quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient’s relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index ‘r-icu’
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1975-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rensenans qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT vanmolmargom qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT menheereilse qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT nijkampmarjand qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT verhoogtellen qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT marisbea qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT manderswilleke qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT vloetlilian qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu
AT verharenlisbeth qualityofcareintheintensivecareunitfromtheperspectiveofpatientsrelativesdevelopmentandpsychometricevaluationoftheconsumerqualityindexricu