Cargando…
Are men well served by family planning programs?
Although the range of contraceptives includes methods for men, namely condoms, vasectomy and withdrawal that men use directly, and the Standard Days Method (SDM) that requires their participation, family planning programming has primarily focused on women. What is known about reaching men as contrac...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5 |
_version_ | 1782499326728077312 |
---|---|
author | Hardee, Karen Croce-Galis, Melanie Gay, Jill |
author_facet | Hardee, Karen Croce-Galis, Melanie Gay, Jill |
author_sort | Hardee, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the range of contraceptives includes methods for men, namely condoms, vasectomy and withdrawal that men use directly, and the Standard Days Method (SDM) that requires their participation, family planning programming has primarily focused on women. What is known about reaching men as contraceptive users? This paper draws from a review of 47 interventions that reached men and proposes 10 key considerations for strengthening programming for men as contraceptive users. A review of programming shows that men and boys are not particularly well served by programs. Most programs operate from the perspective that women are contraceptive users and that men should support their partners, with insufficient attention to reaching men as contraceptive users in their own right. The notion that family planning is women’s business only is outdated. There is sufficient evidence demonstrating men’s desire for information and services, as well as men’s positive response to existing programming to warrant further programming for men as FP users. The key considerations focus on getting information and services where men and boys need it; addressing gender norms that affect men’s attitudes and use while respecting women’s autonomy; reaching adolescent boys; including men as users in policies and guidelines; scaling up successful programming; filling gaps with implementation research and monitoring & evaluation; and creating more contraceptive options for men. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5260026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52600262017-01-26 Are men well served by family planning programs? Hardee, Karen Croce-Galis, Melanie Gay, Jill Reprod Health Review Although the range of contraceptives includes methods for men, namely condoms, vasectomy and withdrawal that men use directly, and the Standard Days Method (SDM) that requires their participation, family planning programming has primarily focused on women. What is known about reaching men as contraceptive users? This paper draws from a review of 47 interventions that reached men and proposes 10 key considerations for strengthening programming for men as contraceptive users. A review of programming shows that men and boys are not particularly well served by programs. Most programs operate from the perspective that women are contraceptive users and that men should support their partners, with insufficient attention to reaching men as contraceptive users in their own right. The notion that family planning is women’s business only is outdated. There is sufficient evidence demonstrating men’s desire for information and services, as well as men’s positive response to existing programming to warrant further programming for men as FP users. The key considerations focus on getting information and services where men and boys need it; addressing gender norms that affect men’s attitudes and use while respecting women’s autonomy; reaching adolescent boys; including men as users in policies and guidelines; scaling up successful programming; filling gaps with implementation research and monitoring & evaluation; and creating more contraceptive options for men. BioMed Central 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5260026/ /pubmed/28115004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Hardee, Karen Croce-Galis, Melanie Gay, Jill Are men well served by family planning programs? |
title | Are men well served by family planning programs? |
title_full | Are men well served by family planning programs? |
title_fullStr | Are men well served by family planning programs? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are men well served by family planning programs? |
title_short | Are men well served by family planning programs? |
title_sort | are men well served by family planning programs? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardeekaren aremenwellservedbyfamilyplanningprograms AT crocegalismelanie aremenwellservedbyfamilyplanningprograms AT gayjill aremenwellservedbyfamilyplanningprograms |