Cargando…
The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture
Many aspects of animal and human gait and posture cannot be predicted from purely mechanical work minimization or entirely based on optimizing muscle efficiency. Here, the Muscle-Mechanical Compromise Framework is introduced as a conceptual paradigm for considering the interactions and compromises b...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0198 |
_version_ | 1782499419006959616 |
---|---|
author | Usherwood, James Richard (Jim) |
author_facet | Usherwood, James Richard (Jim) |
author_sort | Usherwood, James Richard (Jim) |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many aspects of animal and human gait and posture cannot be predicted from purely mechanical work minimization or entirely based on optimizing muscle efficiency. Here, the Muscle-Mechanical Compromise Framework is introduced as a conceptual paradigm for considering the interactions and compromises between these two objectives. Current assumptions in implementing the Framework are presented. Implications of the compromise are discussed and related to the scaling of running mechanics and animal posture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5260522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | De Gruyter |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52605222017-02-01 The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture Usherwood, James Richard (Jim) J Hum Kinet Research Article Many aspects of animal and human gait and posture cannot be predicted from purely mechanical work minimization or entirely based on optimizing muscle efficiency. Here, the Muscle-Mechanical Compromise Framework is introduced as a conceptual paradigm for considering the interactions and compromises between these two objectives. Current assumptions in implementing the Framework are presented. Implications of the compromise are discussed and related to the scaling of running mechanics and animal posture. De Gruyter 2016-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5260522/ /pubmed/28149398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0198 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics |
spellingShingle | Research Article Usherwood, James Richard (Jim) The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture |
title | The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture |
title_full | The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture |
title_fullStr | The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture |
title_full_unstemmed | The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture |
title_short | The muscle-mechanical compromise framework: Implications for the scaling of gait and posture |
title_sort | muscle-mechanical compromise framework: implications for the scaling of gait and posture |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT usherwoodjamesrichardjim themusclemechanicalcompromiseframeworkimplicationsforthescalingofgaitandposture AT usherwoodjamesrichardjim musclemechanicalcompromiseframeworkimplicationsforthescalingofgaitandposture |