Cargando…

Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit

Triathletes exiting the swim portion of an event have to decide on how and when to take a wetsuit off (if worn). The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological cost of running while not using a wetsuit, carrying a wetsuit, wearing a wetsuit halfway down or wearing a wetsuit fully up. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciulei, Mihaela, Prado, Aaron, Navalta, James, Mercer, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0169
_version_ 1782499423742328832
author Ciulei, Mihaela
Prado, Aaron
Navalta, James
Mercer, John A.
author_facet Ciulei, Mihaela
Prado, Aaron
Navalta, James
Mercer, John A.
author_sort Ciulei, Mihaela
collection PubMed
description Triathletes exiting the swim portion of an event have to decide on how and when to take a wetsuit off (if worn). The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological cost of running while not using a wetsuit, carrying a wetsuit, wearing a wetsuit halfway down or wearing a wetsuit fully up. Participants (n = 20, 30.9 ± 8.7 yrs, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 71.6 ± 9.5 kg) completed four 5 min running conditions: 1) not wearing the wetsuit, 2) wearing the wetsuit fully up, 3) wearing the wetsuit halfway down, and 4) carrying the wetsuit. A rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion and stride frequency were measured and were each influenced by wetsuit condition (p < 0.05). Each variable (i.e., a rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, stride frequency) was lower during running while not wearing the wetsuit vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The rate of oxygen uptake was greatest during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The heart rate was not different between any of the combinations of either wearing the wetsuit fully up or halfway down or carrying the wetsuit (p > 0.05). The rating of perceived exertion was greater during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. carrying the wetsuit (p < 0.05). Stride frequency was lower during not wearing the wetsuit vs. wearing the wetsuit halfway down or fully up (p < 0.05). It was concluded that running with the wetsuit halfway down resulted in the greatest rate of oxygen uptake, heart rate and rating of perceived exertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5260549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52605492017-02-01 Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit Ciulei, Mihaela Prado, Aaron Navalta, James Mercer, John A. J Hum Kinet Research Article Triathletes exiting the swim portion of an event have to decide on how and when to take a wetsuit off (if worn). The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological cost of running while not using a wetsuit, carrying a wetsuit, wearing a wetsuit halfway down or wearing a wetsuit fully up. Participants (n = 20, 30.9 ± 8.7 yrs, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 71.6 ± 9.5 kg) completed four 5 min running conditions: 1) not wearing the wetsuit, 2) wearing the wetsuit fully up, 3) wearing the wetsuit halfway down, and 4) carrying the wetsuit. A rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion and stride frequency were measured and were each influenced by wetsuit condition (p < 0.05). Each variable (i.e., a rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, stride frequency) was lower during running while not wearing the wetsuit vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The rate of oxygen uptake was greatest during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The heart rate was not different between any of the combinations of either wearing the wetsuit fully up or halfway down or carrying the wetsuit (p > 0.05). The rating of perceived exertion was greater during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. carrying the wetsuit (p < 0.05). Stride frequency was lower during not wearing the wetsuit vs. wearing the wetsuit halfway down or fully up (p < 0.05). It was concluded that running with the wetsuit halfway down resulted in the greatest rate of oxygen uptake, heart rate and rating of perceived exertion. De Gruyter 2016-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5260549/ /pubmed/28149367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0169 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics
spellingShingle Research Article
Ciulei, Mihaela
Prado, Aaron
Navalta, James
Mercer, John A.
Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
title Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
title_full Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
title_fullStr Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
title_full_unstemmed Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
title_short Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
title_sort triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0169
work_keys_str_mv AT ciuleimihaela triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit
AT pradoaaron triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit
AT navaltajames triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit
AT mercerjohna triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit