Cargando…
Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit
Triathletes exiting the swim portion of an event have to decide on how and when to take a wetsuit off (if worn). The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological cost of running while not using a wetsuit, carrying a wetsuit, wearing a wetsuit halfway down or wearing a wetsuit fully up. P...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0169 |
_version_ | 1782499423742328832 |
---|---|
author | Ciulei, Mihaela Prado, Aaron Navalta, James Mercer, John A. |
author_facet | Ciulei, Mihaela Prado, Aaron Navalta, James Mercer, John A. |
author_sort | Ciulei, Mihaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Triathletes exiting the swim portion of an event have to decide on how and when to take a wetsuit off (if worn). The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological cost of running while not using a wetsuit, carrying a wetsuit, wearing a wetsuit halfway down or wearing a wetsuit fully up. Participants (n = 20, 30.9 ± 8.7 yrs, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 71.6 ± 9.5 kg) completed four 5 min running conditions: 1) not wearing the wetsuit, 2) wearing the wetsuit fully up, 3) wearing the wetsuit halfway down, and 4) carrying the wetsuit. A rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion and stride frequency were measured and were each influenced by wetsuit condition (p < 0.05). Each variable (i.e., a rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, stride frequency) was lower during running while not wearing the wetsuit vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The rate of oxygen uptake was greatest during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The heart rate was not different between any of the combinations of either wearing the wetsuit fully up or halfway down or carrying the wetsuit (p > 0.05). The rating of perceived exertion was greater during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. carrying the wetsuit (p < 0.05). Stride frequency was lower during not wearing the wetsuit vs. wearing the wetsuit halfway down or fully up (p < 0.05). It was concluded that running with the wetsuit halfway down resulted in the greatest rate of oxygen uptake, heart rate and rating of perceived exertion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5260549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | De Gruyter |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52605492017-02-01 Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit Ciulei, Mihaela Prado, Aaron Navalta, James Mercer, John A. J Hum Kinet Research Article Triathletes exiting the swim portion of an event have to decide on how and when to take a wetsuit off (if worn). The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological cost of running while not using a wetsuit, carrying a wetsuit, wearing a wetsuit halfway down or wearing a wetsuit fully up. Participants (n = 20, 30.9 ± 8.7 yrs, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 71.6 ± 9.5 kg) completed four 5 min running conditions: 1) not wearing the wetsuit, 2) wearing the wetsuit fully up, 3) wearing the wetsuit halfway down, and 4) carrying the wetsuit. A rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion and stride frequency were measured and were each influenced by wetsuit condition (p < 0.05). Each variable (i.e., a rate of oxygen uptake, a heart rate, stride frequency) was lower during running while not wearing the wetsuit vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The rate of oxygen uptake was greatest during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. any other condition (p < 0.05). The heart rate was not different between any of the combinations of either wearing the wetsuit fully up or halfway down or carrying the wetsuit (p > 0.05). The rating of perceived exertion was greater during wearing the wetsuit halfway down vs. carrying the wetsuit (p < 0.05). Stride frequency was lower during not wearing the wetsuit vs. wearing the wetsuit halfway down or fully up (p < 0.05). It was concluded that running with the wetsuit halfway down resulted in the greatest rate of oxygen uptake, heart rate and rating of perceived exertion. De Gruyter 2016-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5260549/ /pubmed/28149367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0169 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ciulei, Mihaela Prado, Aaron Navalta, James Mercer, John A. Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit |
title | Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit |
title_full | Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit |
title_fullStr | Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit |
title_full_unstemmed | Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit |
title_short | Triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit |
title_sort | triathlon wetsuit removal strategy: physiological cost of running with a wetsuit |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ciuleimihaela triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit AT pradoaaron triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit AT navaltajames triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit AT mercerjohna triathlonwetsuitremovalstrategyphysiologicalcostofrunningwithawetsuit |