Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension

Hip–spine coordination, known as the lumbopelvic rhythm, can be expressed as the lumbar–hip ratio. The lumbopelvic rhythm and lumbar–hip ratio can be used to assess lower limb function. We clarified the lumbopelvic rhythm and lumbar–hip ratio during trunk extension. We established a novel set of mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tojima, Michio, Ogata, Naoshi, Nakahara, Yasuo, Haga, Nobuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0141
_version_ 1782499440537370624
author Tojima, Michio
Ogata, Naoshi
Nakahara, Yasuo
Haga, Nobuhiko
author_facet Tojima, Michio
Ogata, Naoshi
Nakahara, Yasuo
Haga, Nobuhiko
author_sort Tojima, Michio
collection PubMed
description Hip–spine coordination, known as the lumbopelvic rhythm, can be expressed as the lumbar–hip ratio. The lumbopelvic rhythm and lumbar–hip ratio can be used to assess lower limb function. We clarified the lumbopelvic rhythm and lumbar–hip ratio during trunk extension. We established a novel set of marker positions for three-dimensional motion analysis to assess the lumbar spinal angle. The original markers were placed on both paravertebral muscle groups at the 11th thoracic spinous process level, the 10th and 12th thoracic spinous processes, and the pelvis. We measured angle data during trunk extension using three-dimensional motion analysis, and the data for eight healthy male subjects were categorized into backward and forward phases. The lumbar–hip ratio increased significantly from 1.2 to 1.9 (mean, 1.6) in the backward phase, indicating considerable movement of the lumbar spine compared with hip movement in the latter phase. In the forward phase, the ratio decreased significantly from 1.9 to 0.5 (mean, 1.5). After completion of 80% of the forward phase, the lumbar–hip ratio decreased to <1.0. The lumbopelvic rhythm for trunk extension was better expressed by a cubic or quadratic function than a linear function. According to a linear function, when the hip extends by 1°, lumbar spine extends by 1.9°. Therefore, lumbar spinal movement was greater than hip movement in the sagittal plane. The implication of the curved line would indicate lumbar extension instead of the limitation of hip extension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5260639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52606392017-02-01 Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension Tojima, Michio Ogata, Naoshi Nakahara, Yasuo Haga, Nobuhiko J Hum Kinet Research Article Hip–spine coordination, known as the lumbopelvic rhythm, can be expressed as the lumbar–hip ratio. The lumbopelvic rhythm and lumbar–hip ratio can be used to assess lower limb function. We clarified the lumbopelvic rhythm and lumbar–hip ratio during trunk extension. We established a novel set of marker positions for three-dimensional motion analysis to assess the lumbar spinal angle. The original markers were placed on both paravertebral muscle groups at the 11th thoracic spinous process level, the 10th and 12th thoracic spinous processes, and the pelvis. We measured angle data during trunk extension using three-dimensional motion analysis, and the data for eight healthy male subjects were categorized into backward and forward phases. The lumbar–hip ratio increased significantly from 1.2 to 1.9 (mean, 1.6) in the backward phase, indicating considerable movement of the lumbar spine compared with hip movement in the latter phase. In the forward phase, the ratio decreased significantly from 1.9 to 0.5 (mean, 1.5). After completion of 80% of the forward phase, the lumbar–hip ratio decreased to <1.0. The lumbopelvic rhythm for trunk extension was better expressed by a cubic or quadratic function than a linear function. According to a linear function, when the hip extends by 1°, lumbar spine extends by 1.9°. Therefore, lumbar spinal movement was greater than hip movement in the sagittal plane. The implication of the curved line would indicate lumbar extension instead of the limitation of hip extension. De Gruyter 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5260639/ /pubmed/28149341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0141 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics
spellingShingle Research Article
Tojima, Michio
Ogata, Naoshi
Nakahara, Yasuo
Haga, Nobuhiko
Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension
title Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension
title_full Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension
title_short Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis of Lumbopelvic Rhythm During Trunk Extension
title_sort three-dimensional motion analysis of lumbopelvic rhythm during trunk extension
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0141
work_keys_str_mv AT tojimamichio threedimensionalmotionanalysisoflumbopelvicrhythmduringtrunkextension
AT ogatanaoshi threedimensionalmotionanalysisoflumbopelvicrhythmduringtrunkextension
AT nakaharayasuo threedimensionalmotionanalysisoflumbopelvicrhythmduringtrunkextension
AT haganobuhiko threedimensionalmotionanalysisoflumbopelvicrhythmduringtrunkextension