Cargando…

Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience

The aim of this study was to determine differences in glycolytic metabolite concentrations and work output in response to an all-out interval training session in 23 cyclists with at least 2 years of interval training experience (E) and those inexperienced (IE) in this form of training. The intervent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hebisz, Rafal, Hebisz, Paulina, Borkowski, Jacek, Zatoń, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0147
_version_ 1782499441876402176
author Hebisz, Rafal
Hebisz, Paulina
Borkowski, Jacek
Zatoń, Marek
author_facet Hebisz, Rafal
Hebisz, Paulina
Borkowski, Jacek
Zatoń, Marek
author_sort Hebisz, Rafal
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to determine differences in glycolytic metabolite concentrations and work output in response to an all-out interval training session in 23 cyclists with at least 2 years of interval training experience (E) and those inexperienced (IE) in this form of training. The intervention involved subsequent sets of maximal intensity exercise on a cycle ergometer. Each set comprised four 30 s repetitions interspersed with 90 s recovery periods; sets were repeated when blood pH returned to 7.3. Measurements of post-exercise hydrogen (H+) and lactate ion (LA-) concentrations and work output were taken. The experienced cyclists performed significantly more sets of maximal efforts than the inexperienced athletes (5.8 ± 1.2 vs. 4.3 ± 0.9 sets, respectively). Work output decreased in each subsequent set in the IE group and only in the last set in the E group. Distribution of power output changed only in the E group; power decreased in the initial repetitions of set only to increase in the final repetitions. H+ concentration decreased in the third, penultimate, and last sets in the E group and in each subsequent set in the IE group. LA- decreased in the last set in both groups. In conclusion, the experienced cyclists were able to repeatedly induce elevated levels of lactic acidosis. Power output distribution changed with decreased acid–base imbalance. In this way, this group could compensate for a decreased anaerobic metabolism. The above factors allowed cyclists experienced in interval training to perform more sets of maximal exercise without a decrease in power output compared with inexperienced cyclists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5260645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52606452017-02-01 Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience Hebisz, Rafal Hebisz, Paulina Borkowski, Jacek Zatoń, Marek J Hum Kinet Research Article The aim of this study was to determine differences in glycolytic metabolite concentrations and work output in response to an all-out interval training session in 23 cyclists with at least 2 years of interval training experience (E) and those inexperienced (IE) in this form of training. The intervention involved subsequent sets of maximal intensity exercise on a cycle ergometer. Each set comprised four 30 s repetitions interspersed with 90 s recovery periods; sets were repeated when blood pH returned to 7.3. Measurements of post-exercise hydrogen (H+) and lactate ion (LA-) concentrations and work output were taken. The experienced cyclists performed significantly more sets of maximal efforts than the inexperienced athletes (5.8 ± 1.2 vs. 4.3 ± 0.9 sets, respectively). Work output decreased in each subsequent set in the IE group and only in the last set in the E group. Distribution of power output changed only in the E group; power decreased in the initial repetitions of set only to increase in the final repetitions. H+ concentration decreased in the third, penultimate, and last sets in the E group and in each subsequent set in the IE group. LA- decreased in the last set in both groups. In conclusion, the experienced cyclists were able to repeatedly induce elevated levels of lactic acidosis. Power output distribution changed with decreased acid–base imbalance. In this way, this group could compensate for a decreased anaerobic metabolism. The above factors allowed cyclists experienced in interval training to perform more sets of maximal exercise without a decrease in power output compared with inexperienced cyclists. De Gruyter 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5260645/ /pubmed/28149346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0147 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics
spellingShingle Research Article
Hebisz, Rafal
Hebisz, Paulina
Borkowski, Jacek
Zatoń, Marek
Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience
title Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience
title_full Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience
title_fullStr Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience
title_short Differences in Physiological Responses to Interval Training in Cyclists With and Without Interval Training Experience
title_sort differences in physiological responses to interval training in cyclists with and without interval training experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0147
work_keys_str_mv AT hebiszrafal differencesinphysiologicalresponsestointervaltrainingincyclistswithandwithoutintervaltrainingexperience
AT hebiszpaulina differencesinphysiologicalresponsestointervaltrainingincyclistswithandwithoutintervaltrainingexperience
AT borkowskijacek differencesinphysiologicalresponsestointervaltrainingincyclistswithandwithoutintervaltrainingexperience
AT zatonmarek differencesinphysiologicalresponsestointervaltrainingincyclistswithandwithoutintervaltrainingexperience