Cargando…

Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015

BACKGROUND: The ICD-10 categories of the diagnosis “perinatal asphyxia” are defined by clinical signs and a 1-minute Apgar score value. However, the modern conception is more complex and considers metabolic values related to the clinical state. A lack of consistency between the former clinical and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Endrich, Olga, Rimle, Carole, Zwahlen, Marcel, Triep, Karen, Raio, Luigi, Nelle, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5261744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170691
_version_ 1782499640647614464
author Endrich, Olga
Rimle, Carole
Zwahlen, Marcel
Triep, Karen
Raio, Luigi
Nelle, Mathias
author_facet Endrich, Olga
Rimle, Carole
Zwahlen, Marcel
Triep, Karen
Raio, Luigi
Nelle, Mathias
author_sort Endrich, Olga
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ICD-10 categories of the diagnosis “perinatal asphyxia” are defined by clinical signs and a 1-minute Apgar score value. However, the modern conception is more complex and considers metabolic values related to the clinical state. A lack of consistency between the former clinical and the latter encoded diagnosis poses questions over the validity of the data. Our aim was to establish a refined classification which is able to distinctly separate cases according to clinical criteria and financial resource consumption. The hypothesis of the study is that outdated ICD-10 definitions result in differences between the encoded diagnosis asphyxia and the medical diagnosis referring to the clinical context. METHODS: Routinely collected health data (encoding and financial data) of the University Hospital of Bern were used. The study population was chosen by selected ICD codes, the encoded and the clinical diagnosis were analyzed and each case was reevaluated. The new method categorizes the diagnoses of perinatal asphyxia into the following groups: mild, moderate and severe asphyxia, metabolic acidosis and normal clinical findings. The differences of total costs per case were determined by using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The study population included 622 cases (P20 “intrauterine hypoxia” 399, P21 “birth asphyxia” 233). By applying the new method, the diagnosis asphyxia could be ruled out with a high probability in 47% of cases and the variance of case related costs (one-way ANOVA: F (5, 616) = 55.84, p < 0.001, multiple R-squared = 0.312, p < 0.001) could be best explained. The classification of the severity of asphyxia could clearly be linked to the complexity of cases. CONCLUSION: The refined coding method provides clearly defined diagnoses groups and has the strongest effect on the distribution of costs. It improves the diagnosis accuracy of perinatal asphyxia concerning clinical practice, research and reimbursement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5261744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52617442017-02-17 Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015 Endrich, Olga Rimle, Carole Zwahlen, Marcel Triep, Karen Raio, Luigi Nelle, Mathias PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The ICD-10 categories of the diagnosis “perinatal asphyxia” are defined by clinical signs and a 1-minute Apgar score value. However, the modern conception is more complex and considers metabolic values related to the clinical state. A lack of consistency between the former clinical and the latter encoded diagnosis poses questions over the validity of the data. Our aim was to establish a refined classification which is able to distinctly separate cases according to clinical criteria and financial resource consumption. The hypothesis of the study is that outdated ICD-10 definitions result in differences between the encoded diagnosis asphyxia and the medical diagnosis referring to the clinical context. METHODS: Routinely collected health data (encoding and financial data) of the University Hospital of Bern were used. The study population was chosen by selected ICD codes, the encoded and the clinical diagnosis were analyzed and each case was reevaluated. The new method categorizes the diagnoses of perinatal asphyxia into the following groups: mild, moderate and severe asphyxia, metabolic acidosis and normal clinical findings. The differences of total costs per case were determined by using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The study population included 622 cases (P20 “intrauterine hypoxia” 399, P21 “birth asphyxia” 233). By applying the new method, the diagnosis asphyxia could be ruled out with a high probability in 47% of cases and the variance of case related costs (one-way ANOVA: F (5, 616) = 55.84, p < 0.001, multiple R-squared = 0.312, p < 0.001) could be best explained. The classification of the severity of asphyxia could clearly be linked to the complexity of cases. CONCLUSION: The refined coding method provides clearly defined diagnoses groups and has the strongest effect on the distribution of costs. It improves the diagnosis accuracy of perinatal asphyxia concerning clinical practice, research and reimbursement. Public Library of Science 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5261744/ /pubmed/28118380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170691 Text en © 2017 Endrich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Endrich, Olga
Rimle, Carole
Zwahlen, Marcel
Triep, Karen
Raio, Luigi
Nelle, Mathias
Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015
title Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015
title_full Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015
title_fullStr Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015
title_full_unstemmed Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015
title_short Asphyxia in the Newborn: Evaluating the Accuracy of ICD Coding, Clinical Diagnosis and Reimbursement: Observational Study at a Swiss Tertiary Care Center on Routinely Collected Health Data from 2012-2015
title_sort asphyxia in the newborn: evaluating the accuracy of icd coding, clinical diagnosis and reimbursement: observational study at a swiss tertiary care center on routinely collected health data from 2012-2015
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5261744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28118380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170691
work_keys_str_mv AT endricholga asphyxiainthenewbornevaluatingtheaccuracyoficdcodingclinicaldiagnosisandreimbursementobservationalstudyataswisstertiarycarecenteronroutinelycollectedhealthdatafrom20122015
AT rimlecarole asphyxiainthenewbornevaluatingtheaccuracyoficdcodingclinicaldiagnosisandreimbursementobservationalstudyataswisstertiarycarecenteronroutinelycollectedhealthdatafrom20122015
AT zwahlenmarcel asphyxiainthenewbornevaluatingtheaccuracyoficdcodingclinicaldiagnosisandreimbursementobservationalstudyataswisstertiarycarecenteronroutinelycollectedhealthdatafrom20122015
AT triepkaren asphyxiainthenewbornevaluatingtheaccuracyoficdcodingclinicaldiagnosisandreimbursementobservationalstudyataswisstertiarycarecenteronroutinelycollectedhealthdatafrom20122015
AT raioluigi asphyxiainthenewbornevaluatingtheaccuracyoficdcodingclinicaldiagnosisandreimbursementobservationalstudyataswisstertiarycarecenteronroutinelycollectedhealthdatafrom20122015
AT nellemathias asphyxiainthenewbornevaluatingtheaccuracyoficdcodingclinicaldiagnosisandreimbursementobservationalstudyataswisstertiarycarecenteronroutinelycollectedhealthdatafrom20122015