Cargando…
Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods
BACKGROUND: In view of the issues surrounding physical restraint use, it is important to have a method of measurement as valid and reliable as possible. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of physical restraint use a) reported by nursing staff and b) reviewed from medical and nursing recor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC526298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15488144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-3-5 |
_version_ | 1782121934988771328 |
---|---|
author | Laurin, Danielle Voyer, Philippe Verreault, René Durand, Pierre J |
author_facet | Laurin, Danielle Voyer, Philippe Verreault, René Durand, Pierre J |
author_sort | Laurin, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In view of the issues surrounding physical restraint use, it is important to have a method of measurement as valid and reliable as possible. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of physical restraint use a) reported by nursing staff and b) reviewed from medical and nursing records in nursing home settings, by comparing these methods with direct observation. METHODS: We sampled eight care units in skilled nursing homes, seven care units in nursing homes and one long-term care unit in a hospital, from eight facilities which included 28 nurses and 377 residents. Physical restraint use was assessed the day following three periods of direct observation by two different means: interview with one or several members of the regular nursing staff, and review of medical and nursing records. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated according to 2-by-2 contingency tables. Differences between the methods were assessed using the phi coefficient. Other information collected included: demographic characteristics, disruptive behaviors, body alignment problems, cognitive and functional skills. RESULTS: Compared to direct observation (gold standard), reported restraint use by nursing staff yielded a sensitivity of 87.4% at a specificity of 93.7% (phi = 0.84). When data was reviewed from subjects' medical and nursing records, sensitivity was reduced to 74.8%, and specificity to 86.3% (phi = 0.54). Justifications for restraint use including risk for falls, agitation, body alignment problems and aggressiveness were associated with the use of physical restraints. CONCLUSIONS: The interview of nursing staff and the review of medical and nursing records are both valid and reliable techniques for measuring physical restraint use among nursing home residents. Higher sensitivity and specificity values were achieved when nursing staff was interviewed as compared to reviewing medical records. This study suggests that the interview of nursing staff is a more reliable method of data collection. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-526298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5262982004-11-10 Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods Laurin, Danielle Voyer, Philippe Verreault, René Durand, Pierre J BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: In view of the issues surrounding physical restraint use, it is important to have a method of measurement as valid and reliable as possible. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of physical restraint use a) reported by nursing staff and b) reviewed from medical and nursing records in nursing home settings, by comparing these methods with direct observation. METHODS: We sampled eight care units in skilled nursing homes, seven care units in nursing homes and one long-term care unit in a hospital, from eight facilities which included 28 nurses and 377 residents. Physical restraint use was assessed the day following three periods of direct observation by two different means: interview with one or several members of the regular nursing staff, and review of medical and nursing records. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated according to 2-by-2 contingency tables. Differences between the methods were assessed using the phi coefficient. Other information collected included: demographic characteristics, disruptive behaviors, body alignment problems, cognitive and functional skills. RESULTS: Compared to direct observation (gold standard), reported restraint use by nursing staff yielded a sensitivity of 87.4% at a specificity of 93.7% (phi = 0.84). When data was reviewed from subjects' medical and nursing records, sensitivity was reduced to 74.8%, and specificity to 86.3% (phi = 0.54). Justifications for restraint use including risk for falls, agitation, body alignment problems and aggressiveness were associated with the use of physical restraints. CONCLUSIONS: The interview of nursing staff and the review of medical and nursing records are both valid and reliable techniques for measuring physical restraint use among nursing home residents. Higher sensitivity and specificity values were achieved when nursing staff was interviewed as compared to reviewing medical records. This study suggests that the interview of nursing staff is a more reliable method of data collection. BioMed Central 2004-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC526298/ /pubmed/15488144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-3-5 Text en Copyright © 2004 Laurin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Laurin, Danielle Voyer, Philippe Verreault, René Durand, Pierre J Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods |
title | Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods |
title_full | Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods |
title_fullStr | Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods |
title_short | Physical restraint use among nursing home residents: A comparison of two data collection methods |
title_sort | physical restraint use among nursing home residents: a comparison of two data collection methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC526298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15488144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-3-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurindanielle physicalrestraintuseamongnursinghomeresidentsacomparisonoftwodatacollectionmethods AT voyerphilippe physicalrestraintuseamongnursinghomeresidentsacomparisonoftwodatacollectionmethods AT verreaultrene physicalrestraintuseamongnursinghomeresidentsacomparisonoftwodatacollectionmethods AT durandpierrej physicalrestraintuseamongnursinghomeresidentsacomparisonoftwodatacollectionmethods |