Cargando…
The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have inve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5263207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1139-3 |
_version_ | 1782499872729989120 |
---|---|
author | Nityananda, Vivek Tarawneh, Ghaith Errington, Steven Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio Read, Jenny |
author_facet | Nityananda, Vivek Tarawneh, Ghaith Errington, Steven Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio Read, Jenny |
author_sort | Nityananda, Vivek |
collection | PubMed |
description | The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have investigated how the horizontal angular extent of stimuli influences the optomotor response. We presented mantises with moving gratings of varying horizontal extents at three different contrasts in the central or peripheral regions of their visual fields. We assessed the relative effectivity of different regions to elicit the optomotor response and modelled the dependency of the response on the angular extent subtended by stimuli at these different regions. Our results show that the optomotor response is governed by stimuli in the central visual field and not in the periphery. The model also shows that in the central region, the probability of response increases linearly with increase in horizontal extent up to a saturation point. Furthermore, the dependency of the optomotor response on the angular extent of the stimulus is modulated by contrast. We discuss the implications of our results for different modes of stimulus presentation and for models of the underlying mechanisms of motion detection in the mantis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5263207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52632072017-02-09 The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field Nityananda, Vivek Tarawneh, Ghaith Errington, Steven Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio Read, Jenny J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Original Paper The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have investigated how the horizontal angular extent of stimuli influences the optomotor response. We presented mantises with moving gratings of varying horizontal extents at three different contrasts in the central or peripheral regions of their visual fields. We assessed the relative effectivity of different regions to elicit the optomotor response and modelled the dependency of the response on the angular extent subtended by stimuli at these different regions. Our results show that the optomotor response is governed by stimuli in the central visual field and not in the periphery. The model also shows that in the central region, the probability of response increases linearly with increase in horizontal extent up to a saturation point. Furthermore, the dependency of the optomotor response on the angular extent of the stimulus is modulated by contrast. We discuss the implications of our results for different modes of stimulus presentation and for models of the underlying mechanisms of motion detection in the mantis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-12-22 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5263207/ /pubmed/28005254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1139-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nityananda, Vivek Tarawneh, Ghaith Errington, Steven Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio Read, Jenny The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field |
title | The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field |
title_full | The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field |
title_fullStr | The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field |
title_full_unstemmed | The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field |
title_short | The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field |
title_sort | optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5263207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1139-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nityanandavivek theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT tarawnehghaith theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT erringtonsteven theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT serranopedrazaignacio theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT readjenny theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT nityanandavivek optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT tarawnehghaith optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT erringtonsteven optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT serranopedrazaignacio optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield AT readjenny optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield |