Cargando…

The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field

The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nityananda, Vivek, Tarawneh, Ghaith, Errington, Steven, Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio, Read, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5263207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1139-3
_version_ 1782499872729989120
author Nityananda, Vivek
Tarawneh, Ghaith
Errington, Steven
Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio
Read, Jenny
author_facet Nityananda, Vivek
Tarawneh, Ghaith
Errington, Steven
Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio
Read, Jenny
author_sort Nityananda, Vivek
collection PubMed
description The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have investigated how the horizontal angular extent of stimuli influences the optomotor response. We presented mantises with moving gratings of varying horizontal extents at three different contrasts in the central or peripheral regions of their visual fields. We assessed the relative effectivity of different regions to elicit the optomotor response and modelled the dependency of the response on the angular extent subtended by stimuli at these different regions. Our results show that the optomotor response is governed by stimuli in the central visual field and not in the periphery. The model also shows that in the central region, the probability of response increases linearly with increase in horizontal extent up to a saturation point. Furthermore, the dependency of the optomotor response on the angular extent of the stimulus is modulated by contrast. We discuss the implications of our results for different modes of stimulus presentation and for models of the underlying mechanisms of motion detection in the mantis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5263207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52632072017-02-09 The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field Nityananda, Vivek Tarawneh, Ghaith Errington, Steven Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio Read, Jenny J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Original Paper The optomotor response has been widely used to investigate insect sensitivity to contrast and motion. Several studies have revealed the sensitivity of this response to frequency and contrast, but we know less about the spatial integration underlying this response. Specifically, few studies have investigated how the horizontal angular extent of stimuli influences the optomotor response. We presented mantises with moving gratings of varying horizontal extents at three different contrasts in the central or peripheral regions of their visual fields. We assessed the relative effectivity of different regions to elicit the optomotor response and modelled the dependency of the response on the angular extent subtended by stimuli at these different regions. Our results show that the optomotor response is governed by stimuli in the central visual field and not in the periphery. The model also shows that in the central region, the probability of response increases linearly with increase in horizontal extent up to a saturation point. Furthermore, the dependency of the optomotor response on the angular extent of the stimulus is modulated by contrast. We discuss the implications of our results for different modes of stimulus presentation and for models of the underlying mechanisms of motion detection in the mantis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-12-22 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5263207/ /pubmed/28005254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1139-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nityananda, Vivek
Tarawneh, Ghaith
Errington, Steven
Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio
Read, Jenny
The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
title The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
title_full The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
title_fullStr The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
title_full_unstemmed The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
title_short The optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
title_sort optomotor response of the praying mantis is driven predominantly by the central visual field
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5263207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1139-3
work_keys_str_mv AT nityanandavivek theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT tarawnehghaith theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT erringtonsteven theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT serranopedrazaignacio theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT readjenny theoptomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT nityanandavivek optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT tarawnehghaith optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT erringtonsteven optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT serranopedrazaignacio optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield
AT readjenny optomotorresponseoftheprayingmantisisdrivenpredominantlybythecentralvisualfield