Cargando…

Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception

During self-motion, humans typically move the eyes to maintain fixation on the stationary environment around them. These eye movements could in principle be used to estimate self-motion, but their impact on perception is unknown. We had participants judge self-motion during different eye-movement co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clemens, Ivar Adrianus H., Selen, Luc P. J., Pomante, Antonella, MacNeilage, Paul R., Medendorp, W. Pieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5263893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0211-16.2016
_version_ 1782499998982733824
author Clemens, Ivar Adrianus H.
Selen, Luc P. J.
Pomante, Antonella
MacNeilage, Paul R.
Medendorp, W. Pieter
author_facet Clemens, Ivar Adrianus H.
Selen, Luc P. J.
Pomante, Antonella
MacNeilage, Paul R.
Medendorp, W. Pieter
author_sort Clemens, Ivar Adrianus H.
collection PubMed
description During self-motion, humans typically move the eyes to maintain fixation on the stationary environment around them. These eye movements could in principle be used to estimate self-motion, but their impact on perception is unknown. We had participants judge self-motion during different eye-movement conditions in the absence of full-field optic flow. In a two-alternative forced choice task, participants indicated whether the second of two successive passive lateral whole-body translations was longer or shorter than the first. This task was used in two experiments. In the first (n = 8), eye movements were constrained differently in the two translation intervals by presenting either a world-fixed or body-fixed fixation point or no fixation point at all (allowing free gaze). Results show that perceived translations were shorter with a body-fixed than a world-fixed fixation point. A linear model indicated that eye-movement signals received a weight of ∼25% for the self-motion percept. This model was independently validated in the trials without a fixation point (free gaze). In the second experiment (n = 10), gaze was free during both translation intervals. Results show that the translation with the larger eye-movement excursion was judged more often to be larger than chance, based on an oculomotor choice probability analysis. We conclude that eye-movement signals influence self-motion perception, even in the absence of visual stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5263893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52638932017-01-31 Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception Clemens, Ivar Adrianus H. Selen, Luc P. J. Pomante, Antonella MacNeilage, Paul R. Medendorp, W. Pieter eNeuro New Research During self-motion, humans typically move the eyes to maintain fixation on the stationary environment around them. These eye movements could in principle be used to estimate self-motion, but their impact on perception is unknown. We had participants judge self-motion during different eye-movement conditions in the absence of full-field optic flow. In a two-alternative forced choice task, participants indicated whether the second of two successive passive lateral whole-body translations was longer or shorter than the first. This task was used in two experiments. In the first (n = 8), eye movements were constrained differently in the two translation intervals by presenting either a world-fixed or body-fixed fixation point or no fixation point at all (allowing free gaze). Results show that perceived translations were shorter with a body-fixed than a world-fixed fixation point. A linear model indicated that eye-movement signals received a weight of ∼25% for the self-motion percept. This model was independently validated in the trials without a fixation point (free gaze). In the second experiment (n = 10), gaze was free during both translation intervals. Results show that the translation with the larger eye-movement excursion was judged more often to be larger than chance, based on an oculomotor choice probability analysis. We conclude that eye-movement signals influence self-motion perception, even in the absence of visual stimulation. Society for Neuroscience 2017-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5263893/ /pubmed/28144623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0211-16.2016 Text en Copyright © 2017 Clemens et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Clemens, Ivar Adrianus H.
Selen, Luc P. J.
Pomante, Antonella
MacNeilage, Paul R.
Medendorp, W. Pieter
Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception
title Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception
title_full Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception
title_fullStr Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception
title_full_unstemmed Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception
title_short Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception
title_sort eye movements in darkness modulate self-motion perception
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5263893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0211-16.2016
work_keys_str_mv AT clemensivaradrianush eyemovementsindarknessmodulateselfmotionperception
AT selenlucpj eyemovementsindarknessmodulateselfmotionperception
AT pomanteantonella eyemovementsindarknessmodulateselfmotionperception
AT macneilagepaulr eyemovementsindarknessmodulateselfmotionperception
AT medendorpwpieter eyemovementsindarknessmodulateselfmotionperception