Cargando…

Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study

BACKGROUND: Guidelines in several European countries recommend standby emergency treatment (SBET) for travellers to regions with low or medium malaria transmission instead of continuous chemoprophylaxis: travellers are advised to seek medical assistance within 24 h in case of fever and to self-admin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinnemeier, Christof D., Rothe, Camilla, Kreuels, Benno, Addo, Marylyn M., Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine, Cramer, Jakob P., Rolling, Thierry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5264331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1678-2
_version_ 1782500084756250624
author Vinnemeier, Christof D.
Rothe, Camilla
Kreuels, Benno
Addo, Marylyn M.
Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine
Cramer, Jakob P.
Rolling, Thierry
author_facet Vinnemeier, Christof D.
Rothe, Camilla
Kreuels, Benno
Addo, Marylyn M.
Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine
Cramer, Jakob P.
Rolling, Thierry
author_sort Vinnemeier, Christof D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines in several European countries recommend standby emergency treatment (SBET) for travellers to regions with low or medium malaria transmission instead of continuous chemoprophylaxis: travellers are advised to seek medical assistance within 24 h in case of fever and to self-administer SBET only if they are not able to consult a doctor within the time period specified. Data on healthcare-seeking behaviour of febrile travellers and utilization of SBET is however scarce as only two studies were performed in the mid-1990s. Since tourism is constantly increasing and malaria epidemiology has dramatically changed in the meantime more knowledge is urgently needed. METHODS: Some 876 travellers to destinations in South and Southeast Asia with low or medium malaria transmission were recruited in the travel clinic of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. Demographic and travel-related data were collected by using questionnaires. Pre-travel advice was carried out and SBET was prescribed in accordance to national guidelines. Post-travel phone interviews were performed to assess health incidents during travel and individual responses of travellers to febrile illness. RESULTS: Out of 714 patients who were monitored, 130 (18%) reported onset of fever during travel or 14 days after return. Of those travellers who reported fever, 100 (80%) carried SBET during travel. The vast majority of 79 (79%) febrile travellers who carried SBET did not seek medical assistance. Overall, 14 (14%) febrile patients who carried SBET and six (20%) patients who did not carry SBET took the correct measure (doctor visit or timely SBET administration) as a response to febrile illness, respectively. Only two travellers self-administered SBET, but both of them applied the wrong regimen. CONCLUSIONS: In view of declining malaria transmission and improving medical infrastructure in most countries of Southeast Asia and obvious obstacles concerning SBET as shown in this study the current strategy should be re-evaluated. Pre-travel advice concerning malaria in SEA should focus on appropriate mosquito bite protection and clearly emphasize the need to see a doctor within 24 h after onset of fever.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5264331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52643312017-01-30 Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study Vinnemeier, Christof D. Rothe, Camilla Kreuels, Benno Addo, Marylyn M. Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine Cramer, Jakob P. Rolling, Thierry Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Guidelines in several European countries recommend standby emergency treatment (SBET) for travellers to regions with low or medium malaria transmission instead of continuous chemoprophylaxis: travellers are advised to seek medical assistance within 24 h in case of fever and to self-administer SBET only if they are not able to consult a doctor within the time period specified. Data on healthcare-seeking behaviour of febrile travellers and utilization of SBET is however scarce as only two studies were performed in the mid-1990s. Since tourism is constantly increasing and malaria epidemiology has dramatically changed in the meantime more knowledge is urgently needed. METHODS: Some 876 travellers to destinations in South and Southeast Asia with low or medium malaria transmission were recruited in the travel clinic of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. Demographic and travel-related data were collected by using questionnaires. Pre-travel advice was carried out and SBET was prescribed in accordance to national guidelines. Post-travel phone interviews were performed to assess health incidents during travel and individual responses of travellers to febrile illness. RESULTS: Out of 714 patients who were monitored, 130 (18%) reported onset of fever during travel or 14 days after return. Of those travellers who reported fever, 100 (80%) carried SBET during travel. The vast majority of 79 (79%) febrile travellers who carried SBET did not seek medical assistance. Overall, 14 (14%) febrile patients who carried SBET and six (20%) patients who did not carry SBET took the correct measure (doctor visit or timely SBET administration) as a response to febrile illness, respectively. Only two travellers self-administered SBET, but both of them applied the wrong regimen. CONCLUSIONS: In view of declining malaria transmission and improving medical infrastructure in most countries of Southeast Asia and obvious obstacles concerning SBET as shown in this study the current strategy should be re-evaluated. Pre-travel advice concerning malaria in SEA should focus on appropriate mosquito bite protection and clearly emphasize the need to see a doctor within 24 h after onset of fever. BioMed Central 2017-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5264331/ /pubmed/28122576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1678-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Vinnemeier, Christof D.
Rothe, Camilla
Kreuels, Benno
Addo, Marylyn M.
Vygen-Bonnet, Sabine
Cramer, Jakob P.
Rolling, Thierry
Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study
title Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study
title_full Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study
title_fullStr Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study
title_short Response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (SBET) for malaria in travellers to Southeast Asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study
title_sort response to fever and utilization of standby emergency treatment (sbet) for malaria in travellers to southeast asia: a questionnaire-based cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5264331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1678-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vinnemeierchristofd responsetofeverandutilizationofstandbyemergencytreatmentsbetformalariaintravellerstosoutheastasiaaquestionnairebasedcohortstudy
AT rothecamilla responsetofeverandutilizationofstandbyemergencytreatmentsbetformalariaintravellerstosoutheastasiaaquestionnairebasedcohortstudy
AT kreuelsbenno responsetofeverandutilizationofstandbyemergencytreatmentsbetformalariaintravellerstosoutheastasiaaquestionnairebasedcohortstudy
AT addomarylynm responsetofeverandutilizationofstandbyemergencytreatmentsbetformalariaintravellerstosoutheastasiaaquestionnairebasedcohortstudy
AT vygenbonnetsabine responsetofeverandutilizationofstandbyemergencytreatmentsbetformalariaintravellerstosoutheastasiaaquestionnairebasedcohortstudy
AT cramerjakobp responsetofeverandutilizationofstandbyemergencytreatmentsbetformalariaintravellerstosoutheastasiaaquestionnairebasedcohortstudy
AT rollingthierry responsetofeverandutilizationofstandbyemergencytreatmentsbetformalariaintravellerstosoutheastasiaaquestionnairebasedcohortstudy