Cargando…

Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?

Morphological embryo classification is of great importance for many laboratory techniques, from basic research to the ones applied to assisted reproductive technology. However, the standard classification method for both human and cattle embryos, is based on quality parameters that reflect the overa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocha, José C., Passalia, Felipe, Matos, Felipe D., Maserati Jr, Marc P., Alves, Mayra F., de Almeida, Tamie G., Cardoso, Bruna L., Basso, Andrea C., Nogueira, Marcelo F. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5264381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27584609
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20160033
_version_ 1782500091891810304
author Rocha, José C.
Passalia, Felipe
Matos, Felipe D.
Maserati Jr, Marc P.
Alves, Mayra F.
de Almeida, Tamie G.
Cardoso, Bruna L.
Basso, Andrea C.
Nogueira, Marcelo F. G.
author_facet Rocha, José C.
Passalia, Felipe
Matos, Felipe D.
Maserati Jr, Marc P.
Alves, Mayra F.
de Almeida, Tamie G.
Cardoso, Bruna L.
Basso, Andrea C.
Nogueira, Marcelo F. G.
author_sort Rocha, José C.
collection PubMed
description Morphological embryo classification is of great importance for many laboratory techniques, from basic research to the ones applied to assisted reproductive technology. However, the standard classification method for both human and cattle embryos, is based on quality parameters that reflect the overall morphological quality of the embryo in cattle, or the quality of the individual embryonic structures, more relevant in human embryo classification. This assessment method is biased by the subjectivity of the evaluator and even though several guidelines exist to standardize the classification, it is not a method capable of giving reliable and trustworthy results. Latest approaches for the improvement of quality assessment include the use of data from cellular metabolism, a new morphological grading system, development kinetics and cleavage symmetry, embryo cell biopsy followed by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, zona pellucida birefringence, ion release by the embryo cells and so forth. Nowadays there exists a great need for evaluation methods that are practical and non-invasive while being accurate and objective. A method along these lines would be of great importance to embryo evaluation by embryologists, clinicians and other professionals who work with assisted reproductive technology. Several techniques shows promising results in this sense, one being the use of digital images of the embryo as basis for features extraction and classification by means of artificial intelligence techniques (as genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks). This process has the potential to become an accurate and objective standard for embryo quality assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5264381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52643812017-03-23 Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard? Rocha, José C. Passalia, Felipe Matos, Felipe D. Maserati Jr, Marc P. Alves, Mayra F. de Almeida, Tamie G. Cardoso, Bruna L. Basso, Andrea C. Nogueira, Marcelo F. G. JBRA Assist Reprod Review Article Morphological embryo classification is of great importance for many laboratory techniques, from basic research to the ones applied to assisted reproductive technology. However, the standard classification method for both human and cattle embryos, is based on quality parameters that reflect the overall morphological quality of the embryo in cattle, or the quality of the individual embryonic structures, more relevant in human embryo classification. This assessment method is biased by the subjectivity of the evaluator and even though several guidelines exist to standardize the classification, it is not a method capable of giving reliable and trustworthy results. Latest approaches for the improvement of quality assessment include the use of data from cellular metabolism, a new morphological grading system, development kinetics and cleavage symmetry, embryo cell biopsy followed by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, zona pellucida birefringence, ion release by the embryo cells and so forth. Nowadays there exists a great need for evaluation methods that are practical and non-invasive while being accurate and objective. A method along these lines would be of great importance to embryo evaluation by embryologists, clinicians and other professionals who work with assisted reproductive technology. Several techniques shows promising results in this sense, one being the use of digital images of the embryo as basis for features extraction and classification by means of artificial intelligence techniques (as genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks). This process has the potential to become an accurate and objective standard for embryo quality assessment. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5264381/ /pubmed/27584609 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20160033 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Rocha, José C.
Passalia, Felipe
Matos, Felipe D.
Maserati Jr, Marc P.
Alves, Mayra F.
de Almeida, Tamie G.
Cardoso, Bruna L.
Basso, Andrea C.
Nogueira, Marcelo F. G.
Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?
title Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?
title_full Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?
title_fullStr Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?
title_full_unstemmed Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?
title_short Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?
title_sort methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: how far we are from the gold standard?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5264381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27584609
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20160033
work_keys_str_mv AT rochajosec methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT passaliafelipe methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT matosfeliped methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT maseratijrmarcp methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT alvesmayraf methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT dealmeidatamieg methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT cardosobrunal methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT bassoandreac methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard
AT nogueiramarcelofg methodsforassessingthequalityofmammalianembryoshowfarwearefromthegoldstandard