Cargando…

Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women

ABSTRACT: This article summarises the information to be offered to women about mammography. After a delineation of the aim of early diagnosis of breast cancer, the difference between screening mammography and diagnostic mammography is explained. The need to bring images and reports from the previous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sardanelli, Francesco, Fallenberg, Eva M., Clauser, Paola, Trimboli, Rubina M., Camps-Herrero, Julia, Helbich, Thomas H., Forrai, Gabor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0531-4
_version_ 1782500232515289088
author Sardanelli, Francesco
Fallenberg, Eva M.
Clauser, Paola
Trimboli, Rubina M.
Camps-Herrero, Julia
Helbich, Thomas H.
Forrai, Gabor
author_facet Sardanelli, Francesco
Fallenberg, Eva M.
Clauser, Paola
Trimboli, Rubina M.
Camps-Herrero, Julia
Helbich, Thomas H.
Forrai, Gabor
author_sort Sardanelli, Francesco
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: This article summarises the information to be offered to women about mammography. After a delineation of the aim of early diagnosis of breast cancer, the difference between screening mammography and diagnostic mammography is explained. The need to bring images and reports from the previous mammogram (and from other recent breast imaging examinations) is highlighted. Mammography technique and procedure are described with particular attention to discomfort and pain experienced by a small number of women who undergo the test. Information is given on the recall during a screening programme and on the request for further work-up after a diagnostic mammography. The logic of the mammography report and of classification systems such as R1-R5 and BI-RADS is illustrated, and brief but clear information is given about the diagnostic performance of the test, with particular reference to interval cancers, i.e., those cancers that are missed at screening mammography. Moreover, the breast cancer risk due to radiation exposure from mammography is compared to the reduction in mortality obtained with the test, and the concept of overdiagnosis is presented with a reliable estimation of its extent. Information about new mammographic technologies (tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography) is also given. Finally, frequently asked questions are answered. KEY POINTS: • Direct digital mammography should be preferred to film-screen or phosphor plates. • Screening (in asymptomatic women) should be distinguished from diagnosis (in symptomatic women). • A breast symptom has to be considered even after a negative mammogram. • Digital breast tomosynthesis increases cancer detection and decreases the recall rate. • Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography can help in cancer detection and lesion characterisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5265195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52651952017-02-08 Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women Sardanelli, Francesco Fallenberg, Eva M. Clauser, Paola Trimboli, Rubina M. Camps-Herrero, Julia Helbich, Thomas H. Forrai, Gabor Insights Imaging Statement ABSTRACT: This article summarises the information to be offered to women about mammography. After a delineation of the aim of early diagnosis of breast cancer, the difference between screening mammography and diagnostic mammography is explained. The need to bring images and reports from the previous mammogram (and from other recent breast imaging examinations) is highlighted. Mammography technique and procedure are described with particular attention to discomfort and pain experienced by a small number of women who undergo the test. Information is given on the recall during a screening programme and on the request for further work-up after a diagnostic mammography. The logic of the mammography report and of classification systems such as R1-R5 and BI-RADS is illustrated, and brief but clear information is given about the diagnostic performance of the test, with particular reference to interval cancers, i.e., those cancers that are missed at screening mammography. Moreover, the breast cancer risk due to radiation exposure from mammography is compared to the reduction in mortality obtained with the test, and the concept of overdiagnosis is presented with a reliable estimation of its extent. Information about new mammographic technologies (tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography) is also given. Finally, frequently asked questions are answered. KEY POINTS: • Direct digital mammography should be preferred to film-screen or phosphor plates. • Screening (in asymptomatic women) should be distinguished from diagnosis (in symptomatic women). • A breast symptom has to be considered even after a negative mammogram. • Digital breast tomosynthesis increases cancer detection and decreases the recall rate. • Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography can help in cancer detection and lesion characterisation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5265195/ /pubmed/27854006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0531-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Statement
Sardanelli, Francesco
Fallenberg, Eva M.
Clauser, Paola
Trimboli, Rubina M.
Camps-Herrero, Julia
Helbich, Thomas H.
Forrai, Gabor
Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women
title Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women
title_full Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women
title_fullStr Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women
title_full_unstemmed Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women
title_short Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women
title_sort mammography: an update of the eusobi recommendations on information for women
topic Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27854006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0531-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sardanellifrancesco mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen
AT fallenbergevam mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen
AT clauserpaola mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen
AT trimbolirubinam mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen
AT campsherrerojulia mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen
AT helbichthomash mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen
AT forraigabor mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen
AT mammographyanupdateoftheeusobirecommendationsoninformationforwomen