Cargando…

Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Recently, increasing relevant studies researched the efficacy of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients using chemotherapy with or without estramustine, in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combining estramustine with chemotherapy for the treatment of CRPC. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Zhiqiang, Li, Xiao, Zhang, Jianzhong, Tang, Jingyuan, Han, Peng, Xu, Zhen, Yu, Yajie, Yang, Chengdi, Wang, Chengming, Xu, Ting, Xu, Zicheng, Zou, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004801
_version_ 1782500361151447040
author Qin, Zhiqiang
Li, Xiao
Zhang, Jianzhong
Tang, Jingyuan
Han, Peng
Xu, Zhen
Yu, Yajie
Yang, Chengdi
Wang, Chengming
Xu, Ting
Xu, Zicheng
Zou, Qing
author_facet Qin, Zhiqiang
Li, Xiao
Zhang, Jianzhong
Tang, Jingyuan
Han, Peng
Xu, Zhen
Yu, Yajie
Yang, Chengdi
Wang, Chengming
Xu, Ting
Xu, Zicheng
Zou, Qing
author_sort Qin, Zhiqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, increasing relevant studies researched the efficacy of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients using chemotherapy with or without estramustine, in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combining estramustine with chemotherapy for the treatment of CRPC. METHODS: Relevant randomized clinical trials were systematically searched from the databases Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science up to April 1, 2016. Data were centrally extracted and analyzed from the previous studies by 2 independent reviewers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with pooled hazard ratios. Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and grade 3 or 4 toxicity using pooled odds ratios. Stata version 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, this meta-analysis identified 9 eligible articles, including a total of 956 patients, who had been accrued between January 1, 1993 and December 1, 2010 and randomly divided into chemotherapy with estramustine and without estramustine. Chemotherapy (with or without estramustine) consisted of docetaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, epirubicin, and vinblastine. Patients who received chemotherapy with estramustine had a better improvement in PSA response rate, comparing those without estramustine (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.20–2.80). However, OS between the 2 groups indicated no significant differences (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77–1.05). Besides, these results of meta-analysis showed no obvious differences between these 2 groups in grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, including anemia (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38–1.57), neutropenia (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.59–1.43), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.19–2.42), nausea (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 0.81–6.72), vomiting (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 0.69–8.51), diarrhea (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 0.93–12.76), fatigue (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32–1.41), neuropathy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.21–1.44), allergic reaction (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.37–6.84), thromboembolic event (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.86–5.51), and edema (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.18–5.95). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicated chemotherapy with additional estramustine increased the PSA response rate. However, OS and grade 3 or 4 toxicity were not improved for these patients with CRPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5265899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52658992017-02-06 Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Qin, Zhiqiang Li, Xiao Zhang, Jianzhong Tang, Jingyuan Han, Peng Xu, Zhen Yu, Yajie Yang, Chengdi Wang, Chengming Xu, Ting Xu, Zicheng Zou, Qing Medicine (Baltimore) 7300 BACKGROUND: Recently, increasing relevant studies researched the efficacy of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients using chemotherapy with or without estramustine, in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combining estramustine with chemotherapy for the treatment of CRPC. METHODS: Relevant randomized clinical trials were systematically searched from the databases Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science up to April 1, 2016. Data were centrally extracted and analyzed from the previous studies by 2 independent reviewers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with pooled hazard ratios. Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and grade 3 or 4 toxicity using pooled odds ratios. Stata version 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall, this meta-analysis identified 9 eligible articles, including a total of 956 patients, who had been accrued between January 1, 1993 and December 1, 2010 and randomly divided into chemotherapy with estramustine and without estramustine. Chemotherapy (with or without estramustine) consisted of docetaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, epirubicin, and vinblastine. Patients who received chemotherapy with estramustine had a better improvement in PSA response rate, comparing those without estramustine (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.20–2.80). However, OS between the 2 groups indicated no significant differences (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77–1.05). Besides, these results of meta-analysis showed no obvious differences between these 2 groups in grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, including anemia (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38–1.57), neutropenia (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.59–1.43), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.19–2.42), nausea (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 0.81–6.72), vomiting (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 0.69–8.51), diarrhea (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 0.93–12.76), fatigue (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32–1.41), neuropathy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.21–1.44), allergic reaction (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.37–6.84), thromboembolic event (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.86–5.51), and edema (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.18–5.95). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicated chemotherapy with additional estramustine increased the PSA response rate. However, OS and grade 3 or 4 toxicity were not improved for these patients with CRPC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5265899/ /pubmed/27684806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004801 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7300
Qin, Zhiqiang
Li, Xiao
Zhang, Jianzhong
Tang, Jingyuan
Han, Peng
Xu, Zhen
Yu, Yajie
Yang, Chengdi
Wang, Chengming
Xu, Ting
Xu, Zicheng
Zou, Qing
Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort chemotherapy with or without estramustine for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 7300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004801
work_keys_str_mv AT qinzhiqiang chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lixiao chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjianzhong chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangjingyuan chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanpeng chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuzhen chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuyajie chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangchengdi chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchengming chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuting chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuzicheng chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zouqing chemotherapywithorwithoutestramustinefortreatmentofcastrationresistantprostatecancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis