Cargando…

Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy

Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusaba, Hitoshi, Kumagai, Hozumi, Inadomi, Kyoko, Matsunobu, Tomoya, Harimaya, Katsumi, Takayoshi, Kotoe, Arita, Shuji, Ariyama, Hiroshi, Akashi, Koichi, Baba, Eishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005460
_version_ 1782500383790202880
author Kusaba, Hitoshi
Kumagai, Hozumi
Inadomi, Kyoko
Matsunobu, Tomoya
Harimaya, Katsumi
Takayoshi, Kotoe
Arita, Shuji
Ariyama, Hiroshi
Akashi, Koichi
Baba, Eishi
author_facet Kusaba, Hitoshi
Kumagai, Hozumi
Inadomi, Kyoko
Matsunobu, Tomoya
Harimaya, Katsumi
Takayoshi, Kotoe
Arita, Shuji
Ariyama, Hiroshi
Akashi, Koichi
Baba, Eishi
author_sort Kusaba, Hitoshi
collection PubMed
description Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18–74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P = 0.027). Patients with no-emesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P = 0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5265997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52659972017-02-06 Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy Kusaba, Hitoshi Kumagai, Hozumi Inadomi, Kyoko Matsunobu, Tomoya Harimaya, Katsumi Takayoshi, Kotoe Arita, Shuji Ariyama, Hiroshi Akashi, Koichi Baba, Eishi Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18–74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P = 0.027). Patients with no-emesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P = 0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5265997/ /pubmed/27930525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005460 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Kusaba, Hitoshi
Kumagai, Hozumi
Inadomi, Kyoko
Matsunobu, Tomoya
Harimaya, Katsumi
Takayoshi, Kotoe
Arita, Shuji
Ariyama, Hiroshi
Akashi, Koichi
Baba, Eishi
Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
title Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
title_full Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
title_fullStr Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
title_short Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
title_sort efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005460
work_keys_str_mv AT kusabahitoshi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT kumagaihozumi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT inadomikyoko efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT matsunobutomoya efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT harimayakatsumi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT takayoshikotoe efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT aritashuji efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT ariyamahiroshi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT akashikoichi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy
AT babaeishi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy