Cargando…
Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin pl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005460 |
_version_ | 1782500383790202880 |
---|---|
author | Kusaba, Hitoshi Kumagai, Hozumi Inadomi, Kyoko Matsunobu, Tomoya Harimaya, Katsumi Takayoshi, Kotoe Arita, Shuji Ariyama, Hiroshi Akashi, Koichi Baba, Eishi |
author_facet | Kusaba, Hitoshi Kumagai, Hozumi Inadomi, Kyoko Matsunobu, Tomoya Harimaya, Katsumi Takayoshi, Kotoe Arita, Shuji Ariyama, Hiroshi Akashi, Koichi Baba, Eishi |
author_sort | Kusaba, Hitoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18–74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P = 0.027). Patients with no-emesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P = 0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5265997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52659972017-02-06 Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy Kusaba, Hitoshi Kumagai, Hozumi Inadomi, Kyoko Matsunobu, Tomoya Harimaya, Katsumi Takayoshi, Kotoe Arita, Shuji Ariyama, Hiroshi Akashi, Koichi Baba, Eishi Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18–74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P = 0.027). Patients with no-emesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P = 0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5265997/ /pubmed/27930525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005460 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Kusaba, Hitoshi Kumagai, Hozumi Inadomi, Kyoko Matsunobu, Tomoya Harimaya, Katsumi Takayoshi, Kotoe Arita, Shuji Ariyama, Hiroshi Akashi, Koichi Baba, Eishi Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy |
title | Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy |
title_full | Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy |
title_fullStr | Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy |
title_short | Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy |
title_sort | efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005460 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kusabahitoshi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT kumagaihozumi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT inadomikyoko efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT matsunobutomoya efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT harimayakatsumi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT takayoshikotoe efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT aritashuji efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT ariyamahiroshi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT akashikoichi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy AT babaeishi efficacyanalysisoftheaprepitantcombinedantiemeticprophylaxisfornonroundcellsofttissuesarcomapatientsreceivedadriamycinandifosfamidetherapy |