Cargando…

Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance

To determine the efficacy of pioglitazone to prevent type 2 diabetes in older compared to younger adults with pre-diabetes. Six hundred two participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were randomized in double blind fashion to placebo or pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in the ACT NOW stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Espinoza, Sara E., Wang, Chen-pin, Tripathy, Devjit, Clement, Stephen C., Schwenke, Dawn C., Banerji, Mary Ann, Bray, George A., Buchanan, Thomas A., Henry, Robert R., Kitabchi, Abbas E., Mudaliar, Sunder, Stentz, Frankie B., Reaven, Peter D., DeFronzo, Ralph A., Musi, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27585671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6
_version_ 1782500429587808256
author Espinoza, Sara E.
Wang, Chen-pin
Tripathy, Devjit
Clement, Stephen C.
Schwenke, Dawn C.
Banerji, Mary Ann
Bray, George A.
Buchanan, Thomas A.
Henry, Robert R.
Kitabchi, Abbas E.
Mudaliar, Sunder
Stentz, Frankie B.
Reaven, Peter D.
DeFronzo, Ralph A.
Musi, Nicolas
author_facet Espinoza, Sara E.
Wang, Chen-pin
Tripathy, Devjit
Clement, Stephen C.
Schwenke, Dawn C.
Banerji, Mary Ann
Bray, George A.
Buchanan, Thomas A.
Henry, Robert R.
Kitabchi, Abbas E.
Mudaliar, Sunder
Stentz, Frankie B.
Reaven, Peter D.
DeFronzo, Ralph A.
Musi, Nicolas
author_sort Espinoza, Sara E.
collection PubMed
description To determine the efficacy of pioglitazone to prevent type 2 diabetes in older compared to younger adults with pre-diabetes. Six hundred two participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were randomized in double blind fashion to placebo or pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in the ACT NOW study (NEJM 364:1104–1115, 2011). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare time to development of diabetes over a mean of 2 years between older (≥61 years) and younger participants. We compared effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on metabolic profiles, inflammatory markers, adipokines, β cell function (disposition index), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), and body composition by ANOVA. Diabetes incidence was reduced by 85 % in older and 69 % in younger subjects (p = 0.41). β cell function (disposition index) increased by 35.0 % in the older and 26.7 % in younger subjects (p = 0.83). Insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) increased by 3.07 (5.2-fold) in older and by 2.54 (3.8-fold) in younger participants (p = 0.58). Pioglitazone more effectively increased adiponectin in older versus younger subjects (22.9 ± 3.2 μg/mL [2.7-fold] vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 μg/mL [2.2-fold], respectively; p = 0.04). Younger subjects tended to have a greater increase in whole body fat mass compared to older subjects (3.6 vs. 3.1 kg; p = 0.061). Younger and older subjects had similar decreases in bone mineral density (0.018 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0138 ± 0.021 g/cm(2)). Younger and older pre-diabetic adults taking pioglitazone had similar reductions in conversion to diabetes and older adults had similar or greater improvements in metabolic risk factors, demonstrating that pioglitazone is useful in preventing diabetes in older adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5266219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52662192017-02-08 Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance Espinoza, Sara E. Wang, Chen-pin Tripathy, Devjit Clement, Stephen C. Schwenke, Dawn C. Banerji, Mary Ann Bray, George A. Buchanan, Thomas A. Henry, Robert R. Kitabchi, Abbas E. Mudaliar, Sunder Stentz, Frankie B. Reaven, Peter D. DeFronzo, Ralph A. Musi, Nicolas Age (Dordr) Original Article To determine the efficacy of pioglitazone to prevent type 2 diabetes in older compared to younger adults with pre-diabetes. Six hundred two participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were randomized in double blind fashion to placebo or pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in the ACT NOW study (NEJM 364:1104–1115, 2011). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare time to development of diabetes over a mean of 2 years between older (≥61 years) and younger participants. We compared effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on metabolic profiles, inflammatory markers, adipokines, β cell function (disposition index), insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index), and body composition by ANOVA. Diabetes incidence was reduced by 85 % in older and 69 % in younger subjects (p = 0.41). β cell function (disposition index) increased by 35.0 % in the older and 26.7 % in younger subjects (p = 0.83). Insulin sensitivity (Matsuda index) increased by 3.07 (5.2-fold) in older and by 2.54 (3.8-fold) in younger participants (p = 0.58). Pioglitazone more effectively increased adiponectin in older versus younger subjects (22.9 ± 3.2 μg/mL [2.7-fold] vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 μg/mL [2.2-fold], respectively; p = 0.04). Younger subjects tended to have a greater increase in whole body fat mass compared to older subjects (3.6 vs. 3.1 kg; p = 0.061). Younger and older subjects had similar decreases in bone mineral density (0.018 ± 0.0071 vs. 0.0138 ± 0.021 g/cm(2)). Younger and older pre-diabetic adults taking pioglitazone had similar reductions in conversion to diabetes and older adults had similar or greater improvements in metabolic risk factors, demonstrating that pioglitazone is useful in preventing diabetes in older adults. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-09-01 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5266219/ /pubmed/27585671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Espinoza, Sara E.
Wang, Chen-pin
Tripathy, Devjit
Clement, Stephen C.
Schwenke, Dawn C.
Banerji, Mary Ann
Bray, George A.
Buchanan, Thomas A.
Henry, Robert R.
Kitabchi, Abbas E.
Mudaliar, Sunder
Stentz, Frankie B.
Reaven, Peter D.
DeFronzo, Ralph A.
Musi, Nicolas
Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance
title Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance
title_full Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance
title_fullStr Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance
title_full_unstemmed Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance
title_short Pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance
title_sort pioglitazone is equally effective for diabetes prevention in older versus younger adults with impaired glucose tolerance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27585671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9946-6
work_keys_str_mv AT espinozasarae pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT wangchenpin pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT tripathydevjit pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT clementstephenc pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT schwenkedawnc pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT banerjimaryann pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT braygeorgea pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT buchananthomasa pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT henryrobertr pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT kitabchiabbase pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT mudaliarsunder pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT stentzfrankieb pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT reavenpeterd pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT defronzoralpha pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance
AT musinicolas pioglitazoneisequallyeffectivefordiabetespreventioninolderversusyoungeradultswithimpairedglucosetolerance