Cargando…

Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Despite recognition that Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) leads to substantial increases in morbidity, mortality, and length of stay, accurate prognostication of these clinical events remains difficult. It remains unclear which approaches to variable selection and model building are most robust. We used da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saly, Danielle, Yang, Alina, Triebwasser, Corey, Oh, Janice, Sun, Qisi, Testani, Jeffrey, Parikh, Chirag R., Bia, Joshua, Biswas, Aditya, Stetson, Chess, Chaisanguanthum, Kris, Wilson, F. Perry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169305
_version_ 1782500436812496896
author Saly, Danielle
Yang, Alina
Triebwasser, Corey
Oh, Janice
Sun, Qisi
Testani, Jeffrey
Parikh, Chirag R.
Bia, Joshua
Biswas, Aditya
Stetson, Chess
Chaisanguanthum, Kris
Wilson, F. Perry
author_facet Saly, Danielle
Yang, Alina
Triebwasser, Corey
Oh, Janice
Sun, Qisi
Testani, Jeffrey
Parikh, Chirag R.
Bia, Joshua
Biswas, Aditya
Stetson, Chess
Chaisanguanthum, Kris
Wilson, F. Perry
author_sort Saly, Danielle
collection PubMed
description Despite recognition that Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) leads to substantial increases in morbidity, mortality, and length of stay, accurate prognostication of these clinical events remains difficult. It remains unclear which approaches to variable selection and model building are most robust. We used data from a randomized trial of AKI alerting to develop time-updated prognostic models using stepwise regression compared to more advanced variable selection techniques. We randomly split data into training and validation cohorts. Outcomes of interest were death within 7 days, dialysis within 7 days, and length of stay. Data elements eligible for model-building included lab values, medications and dosages, procedures, and demographics. We assessed model discrimination using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and r-squared values. 2241 individuals were available for analysis. Both modeling techniques created viable models with very good discrimination ability, with AUCs exceeding 0.85 for dialysis and 0.8 for death prediction. Model performance was similar across model building strategies, though the strategy employing more advanced variable selection was more parsimonious. Very good to excellent prediction of outcome events is feasible in patients with AKI. More advanced techniques may lead to more parsimonious models, which may facilitate adoption in other settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5266278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52662782017-02-17 Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Saly, Danielle Yang, Alina Triebwasser, Corey Oh, Janice Sun, Qisi Testani, Jeffrey Parikh, Chirag R. Bia, Joshua Biswas, Aditya Stetson, Chess Chaisanguanthum, Kris Wilson, F. Perry PLoS One Research Article Despite recognition that Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) leads to substantial increases in morbidity, mortality, and length of stay, accurate prognostication of these clinical events remains difficult. It remains unclear which approaches to variable selection and model building are most robust. We used data from a randomized trial of AKI alerting to develop time-updated prognostic models using stepwise regression compared to more advanced variable selection techniques. We randomly split data into training and validation cohorts. Outcomes of interest were death within 7 days, dialysis within 7 days, and length of stay. Data elements eligible for model-building included lab values, medications and dosages, procedures, and demographics. We assessed model discrimination using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and r-squared values. 2241 individuals were available for analysis. Both modeling techniques created viable models with very good discrimination ability, with AUCs exceeding 0.85 for dialysis and 0.8 for death prediction. Model performance was similar across model building strategies, though the strategy employing more advanced variable selection was more parsimonious. Very good to excellent prediction of outcome events is feasible in patients with AKI. More advanced techniques may lead to more parsimonious models, which may facilitate adoption in other settings. Public Library of Science 2017-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5266278/ /pubmed/28122032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169305 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saly, Danielle
Yang, Alina
Triebwasser, Corey
Oh, Janice
Sun, Qisi
Testani, Jeffrey
Parikh, Chirag R.
Bia, Joshua
Biswas, Aditya
Stetson, Chess
Chaisanguanthum, Kris
Wilson, F. Perry
Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_full Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_fullStr Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_short Approaches to Predicting Outcomes in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
title_sort approaches to predicting outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169305
work_keys_str_mv AT salydanielle approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT yangalina approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT triebwassercorey approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT ohjanice approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT sunqisi approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT testanijeffrey approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT parikhchiragr approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT biajoshua approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT biswasaditya approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT stetsonchess approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT chaisanguanthumkris approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury
AT wilsonfperry approachestopredictingoutcomesinpatientswithacutekidneyinjury