Cargando…

A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh

BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase-deficiency (G6PDd) is a major risk factor for primaquine-induced haemolysis. There is a need for improved point-of-care and laboratory-based G6PD diagnostics to unsure safe use of primaquine. METHODS: G6PD activities of participants in a cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ley, Benedikt, Alam, Mohammad Shafiul, O’Donnell, James J., Hossain, Mohammad Sharif, Kibria, Mohammad Golam, Jahan, Nusrat, Khan, Wasif A., Thriemer, Kamala, Chatfield, Mark D., Price, Ric N., Richards, Jack S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169930
_version_ 1782500441968345088
author Ley, Benedikt
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
O’Donnell, James J.
Hossain, Mohammad Sharif
Kibria, Mohammad Golam
Jahan, Nusrat
Khan, Wasif A.
Thriemer, Kamala
Chatfield, Mark D.
Price, Ric N.
Richards, Jack S.
author_facet Ley, Benedikt
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
O’Donnell, James J.
Hossain, Mohammad Sharif
Kibria, Mohammad Golam
Jahan, Nusrat
Khan, Wasif A.
Thriemer, Kamala
Chatfield, Mark D.
Price, Ric N.
Richards, Jack S.
author_sort Ley, Benedikt
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase-deficiency (G6PDd) is a major risk factor for primaquine-induced haemolysis. There is a need for improved point-of-care and laboratory-based G6PD diagnostics to unsure safe use of primaquine. METHODS: G6PD activities of participants in a cross-sectional survey in Bangladesh were assessed using two novel quantitative assays, the modified WST-8 test and the CareStart(™) G6PD Biosensor (Access Bio), The results were compared with a gold standard UV spectrophotometry assay (Randox). The handheld CareStart(™) Hb instrument (Access Bio) is designed to be a companion instrument to the CareStart(™) G6PD biosensor, and its performance was compared to the well-validated HemoCue(™) method. All quantitative G6PD results were normalized with the HemoCue(™) result. RESULTS: A total of 1002 individuals were enrolled. The adjusted male median (AMM) derived by spectrophotometry was 7.03 U/g Hb (interquartile range (IQR): 5.38–8.69), by WST-8 was 7.03 U/g Hb (IQR: 5.22–8.16) and by Biosensor was 8.61 U/g Hb (IQR: 6.71–10.08). The AMM between spectrophotometry and WST-8 did not differ (p = 1.0) but differed significantly between spectrophotometry and Biosensor (p<0.01). Both, WST-8 and Biosensor were correlated with spectrophotometry (r(s) = 0.5 and r(s) = 0.4, both p<0.001). The mean difference in G6PD activity was -0.12 U/g Hb (95% limit of agreement (95% LoA): -5.45 to 5.20) between spectrophotometry and WST-8 and -1.74U/g Hb (95% LoA: -7.63 to 4.23) between spectrophotometry and Biosensor. The WST-8 identified 55.1% (49/89) and the Biosensor 19.1% (17/89) of individuals with G6PD activity <30% by spectrophotometry. Areas under the ROC curve did not differ significantly for the WST-8 and Biosensor irrespective of the cut-off activity applied (all p>0.05). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting G6PD activity <30% was 0.55 (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.44–0.66) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97–0.99) respectively for the WST-8 and 0.19 (95%CI: 0.12–0.29) and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.98–0.99) respectively for the Biosensor. Hb concentrations measured by HemoCue(™) and CareStart(™) Hb were strongly correlated (r(s) = 0.8, p<0.001, mean difference = 0.09 g Hb/dL, 95% LoA: -2.15 to 2.34). CONCLUSION: WST-8 and the CareStart(™) G6PD Biosensor represent advances in G6PD diagnostics in resource poor settings, but will require further development before clinical deployment. The CareStart(™) Hb instrument produced a precise measure of haemoglobin concentration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5266301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52663012017-02-17 A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh Ley, Benedikt Alam, Mohammad Shafiul O’Donnell, James J. Hossain, Mohammad Sharif Kibria, Mohammad Golam Jahan, Nusrat Khan, Wasif A. Thriemer, Kamala Chatfield, Mark D. Price, Ric N. Richards, Jack S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase-deficiency (G6PDd) is a major risk factor for primaquine-induced haemolysis. There is a need for improved point-of-care and laboratory-based G6PD diagnostics to unsure safe use of primaquine. METHODS: G6PD activities of participants in a cross-sectional survey in Bangladesh were assessed using two novel quantitative assays, the modified WST-8 test and the CareStart(™) G6PD Biosensor (Access Bio), The results were compared with a gold standard UV spectrophotometry assay (Randox). The handheld CareStart(™) Hb instrument (Access Bio) is designed to be a companion instrument to the CareStart(™) G6PD biosensor, and its performance was compared to the well-validated HemoCue(™) method. All quantitative G6PD results were normalized with the HemoCue(™) result. RESULTS: A total of 1002 individuals were enrolled. The adjusted male median (AMM) derived by spectrophotometry was 7.03 U/g Hb (interquartile range (IQR): 5.38–8.69), by WST-8 was 7.03 U/g Hb (IQR: 5.22–8.16) and by Biosensor was 8.61 U/g Hb (IQR: 6.71–10.08). The AMM between spectrophotometry and WST-8 did not differ (p = 1.0) but differed significantly between spectrophotometry and Biosensor (p<0.01). Both, WST-8 and Biosensor were correlated with spectrophotometry (r(s) = 0.5 and r(s) = 0.4, both p<0.001). The mean difference in G6PD activity was -0.12 U/g Hb (95% limit of agreement (95% LoA): -5.45 to 5.20) between spectrophotometry and WST-8 and -1.74U/g Hb (95% LoA: -7.63 to 4.23) between spectrophotometry and Biosensor. The WST-8 identified 55.1% (49/89) and the Biosensor 19.1% (17/89) of individuals with G6PD activity <30% by spectrophotometry. Areas under the ROC curve did not differ significantly for the WST-8 and Biosensor irrespective of the cut-off activity applied (all p>0.05). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting G6PD activity <30% was 0.55 (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.44–0.66) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97–0.99) respectively for the WST-8 and 0.19 (95%CI: 0.12–0.29) and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.98–0.99) respectively for the Biosensor. Hb concentrations measured by HemoCue(™) and CareStart(™) Hb were strongly correlated (r(s) = 0.8, p<0.001, mean difference = 0.09 g Hb/dL, 95% LoA: -2.15 to 2.34). CONCLUSION: WST-8 and the CareStart(™) G6PD Biosensor represent advances in G6PD diagnostics in resource poor settings, but will require further development before clinical deployment. The CareStart(™) Hb instrument produced a precise measure of haemoglobin concentration. Public Library of Science 2017-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5266301/ /pubmed/28121993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169930 Text en © 2017 Ley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ley, Benedikt
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
O’Donnell, James J.
Hossain, Mohammad Sharif
Kibria, Mohammad Golam
Jahan, Nusrat
Khan, Wasif A.
Thriemer, Kamala
Chatfield, Mark D.
Price, Ric N.
Richards, Jack S.
A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
title A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
title_full A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
title_fullStr A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
title_short A Comparison of Three Quantitative Methods to Estimate G6PD Activity in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
title_sort comparison of three quantitative methods to estimate g6pd activity in the chittagong hill tracts, bangladesh
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169930
work_keys_str_mv AT leybenedikt acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT alammohammadshafiul acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT odonnelljamesj acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT hossainmohammadsharif acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT kibriamohammadgolam acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT jahannusrat acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT khanwasifa acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT thriemerkamala acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT chatfieldmarkd acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT pricericn acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT richardsjacks acomparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT leybenedikt comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT alammohammadshafiul comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT odonnelljamesj comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT hossainmohammadsharif comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT kibriamohammadgolam comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT jahannusrat comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT khanwasifa comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT thriemerkamala comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT chatfieldmarkd comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT pricericn comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh
AT richardsjacks comparisonofthreequantitativemethodstoestimateg6pdactivityinthechittagonghilltractsbangladesh