Cargando…

Dynamic Stabilization of Simple Fractures With Active Plates Delivers Stronger Healing Than Conventional Compression Plating

OBJECTIVES: Active plates dynamize a fracture by elastic suspension of screw holes within the plate. We hypothesized that dynamic stabilization with active plates delivers stronger healing relative to standard compression plating. METHODS: Twelve sheep were randomized to receive either a standard co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bottlang, Michael, Tsai, Stanley, Bliven, Emily K., von Rechenberg, Brigitte, Kindt, Philipp, Augat, Peter, Henschel, Julia, Fitzpatrick, Daniel C., Madey, Steven M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27861456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000732
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Active plates dynamize a fracture by elastic suspension of screw holes within the plate. We hypothesized that dynamic stabilization with active plates delivers stronger healing relative to standard compression plating. METHODS: Twelve sheep were randomized to receive either a standard compression plate (CP) or an active plate (ACTIVE) for stabilization of an anatomically reduced tibial osteotomy. In the CP group, absolute stabilization was pursued by interfragmentary compression with 6 cortical screws. In the ACTIVE group, dynamic stabilization after bony apposition was achieved with 6 elastically suspended locking screws. Fracture healing was analyzed weekly on radiographs. After sacrifice 9 weeks postsurgery, the torsional strength of healed tibiae and contralateral tibiae was measured. Finally, computed tomography was used to assess fracture patterns and healing modes. RESULTS: Healing in both groups included periosteal callus formation. ACTIVE specimens had almost 6 times more callus area by week 9 (P < 0.001) than CP specimens. ACTIVE specimens recovered on average 64% of their native strength by week 9, and were over twice as strong as CP specimens, which recovered 24% of their native strength (P = 0.008). Microcomputed tomography demonstrated that compression plating induced a combination of primary bone healing and gap healing. Active plating consistently stimulated biological bone healing by periosteal callus formation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with compression plating, dynamic stabilization of simple fractures with active plates delivers significantly stronger healing.