Cargando…

Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mair, Grant, von Kummer, Rüdiger, Adami, Alessandro, White, Philip M., Adams, Matthew E., Yan, Bernard, Demchuk, Andrew M., Farrall, Andrew J., Sellar, Robin J., Sakka, Eleni, Palmer, Jeb, Perry, David, Lindley, Richard I., Sandercock, Peter A.G., Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164
_version_ 1782500468430209024
author Mair, Grant
von Kummer, Rüdiger
Adami, Alessandro
White, Philip M.
Adams, Matthew E.
Yan, Bernard
Demchuk, Andrew M.
Farrall, Andrew J.
Sellar, Robin J.
Sakka, Eleni
Palmer, Jeb
Perry, David
Lindley, Richard I.
Sandercock, Peter A.G.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_facet Mair, Grant
von Kummer, Rüdiger
Adami, Alessandro
White, Philip M.
Adams, Matthew E.
Yan, Bernard
Demchuk, Andrew M.
Farrall, Andrew J.
Sellar, Robin J.
Sakka, Eleni
Palmer, Jeb
Perry, David
Lindley, Richard I.
Sandercock, Peter A.G.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_sort Mair, Grant
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using randomized controlled trial data. METHODS—: We analyzed angiograms from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial of intravenous alteplase. Readers, masked to clinical, treatment, and outcome data, assessed prerandomization computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for presence, extent, location, and completeness of obstruction and collaterals. We compared angiography findings to 6-month functional outcome (Oxford Handicap Scale) and tested for interactions with alteplase, using ordinal regression in adjusted analyses. We also meta-analyzed all available angiography data from other randomized controlled trials of intravenous thrombolytics. RESULTS—: In IST-3, 300 patients had prerandomization angiography (computed tomographic angiography=271 and magnetic resonance angiography=29). On multivariable analysis, more extensive angiographic obstruction and poor collaterals independently predicted poor outcome (P<0.01). We identified no significant interaction between angiography findings and alteplase effect on Oxford Handicap Scale (P≥0.075) in IST-3. In meta-analysis (5 trials of alteplase or desmoteplase, including IST-3, n=591), there was a significantly increased benefit of thrombolytics on outcome (odds ratio>1 indicates benefit) in patients with (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.64; P=0.011) versus without (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.35; P=0.566) arterial obstruction (P for interaction 0.017). CONCLUSIONS—: Intravenous thrombolytics provide benefit to stroke patients with computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography evidence of arterial obstruction, but the sample was underpowered to demonstrate significant treatment benefit or harm among patients with apparently patent arteries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5266422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52664222017-02-08 Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke Mair, Grant von Kummer, Rüdiger Adami, Alessandro White, Philip M. Adams, Matthew E. Yan, Bernard Demchuk, Andrew M. Farrall, Andrew J. Sellar, Robin J. Sakka, Eleni Palmer, Jeb Perry, David Lindley, Richard I. Sandercock, Peter A.G. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Stroke Original Contributions BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using randomized controlled trial data. METHODS—: We analyzed angiograms from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial of intravenous alteplase. Readers, masked to clinical, treatment, and outcome data, assessed prerandomization computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for presence, extent, location, and completeness of obstruction and collaterals. We compared angiography findings to 6-month functional outcome (Oxford Handicap Scale) and tested for interactions with alteplase, using ordinal regression in adjusted analyses. We also meta-analyzed all available angiography data from other randomized controlled trials of intravenous thrombolytics. RESULTS—: In IST-3, 300 patients had prerandomization angiography (computed tomographic angiography=271 and magnetic resonance angiography=29). On multivariable analysis, more extensive angiographic obstruction and poor collaterals independently predicted poor outcome (P<0.01). We identified no significant interaction between angiography findings and alteplase effect on Oxford Handicap Scale (P≥0.075) in IST-3. In meta-analysis (5 trials of alteplase or desmoteplase, including IST-3, n=591), there was a significantly increased benefit of thrombolytics on outcome (odds ratio>1 indicates benefit) in patients with (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.64; P=0.011) versus without (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.35; P=0.566) arterial obstruction (P for interaction 0.017). CONCLUSIONS—: Intravenous thrombolytics provide benefit to stroke patients with computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography evidence of arterial obstruction, but the sample was underpowered to demonstrate significant treatment benefit or harm among patients with apparently patent arteries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-02 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5266422/ /pubmed/28008093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Mair, Grant
von Kummer, Rüdiger
Adami, Alessandro
White, Philip M.
Adams, Matthew E.
Yan, Bernard
Demchuk, Andrew M.
Farrall, Andrew J.
Sellar, Robin J.
Sakka, Eleni
Palmer, Jeb
Perry, David
Lindley, Richard I.
Sandercock, Peter A.G.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
title Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
title_full Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
title_fullStr Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
title_short Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
title_sort arterial obstruction on computed tomographic or magnetic resonance angiography and response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164
work_keys_str_mv AT mairgrant arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT vonkummerrudiger arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT adamialessandro arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT whitephilipm arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT adamsmatthewe arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT yanbernard arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT demchukandrewm arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT farrallandrewj arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT sellarrobinj arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT sakkaeleni arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT palmerjeb arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT perrydavid arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT lindleyrichardi arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT sandercockpeterag arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke
AT wardlawjoannam arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke