Cargando…
Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using ran...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164 |
_version_ | 1782500468430209024 |
---|---|
author | Mair, Grant von Kummer, Rüdiger Adami, Alessandro White, Philip M. Adams, Matthew E. Yan, Bernard Demchuk, Andrew M. Farrall, Andrew J. Sellar, Robin J. Sakka, Eleni Palmer, Jeb Perry, David Lindley, Richard I. Sandercock, Peter A.G. Wardlaw, Joanna M. |
author_facet | Mair, Grant von Kummer, Rüdiger Adami, Alessandro White, Philip M. Adams, Matthew E. Yan, Bernard Demchuk, Andrew M. Farrall, Andrew J. Sellar, Robin J. Sakka, Eleni Palmer, Jeb Perry, David Lindley, Richard I. Sandercock, Peter A.G. Wardlaw, Joanna M. |
author_sort | Mair, Grant |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using randomized controlled trial data. METHODS—: We analyzed angiograms from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial of intravenous alteplase. Readers, masked to clinical, treatment, and outcome data, assessed prerandomization computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for presence, extent, location, and completeness of obstruction and collaterals. We compared angiography findings to 6-month functional outcome (Oxford Handicap Scale) and tested for interactions with alteplase, using ordinal regression in adjusted analyses. We also meta-analyzed all available angiography data from other randomized controlled trials of intravenous thrombolytics. RESULTS—: In IST-3, 300 patients had prerandomization angiography (computed tomographic angiography=271 and magnetic resonance angiography=29). On multivariable analysis, more extensive angiographic obstruction and poor collaterals independently predicted poor outcome (P<0.01). We identified no significant interaction between angiography findings and alteplase effect on Oxford Handicap Scale (P≥0.075) in IST-3. In meta-analysis (5 trials of alteplase or desmoteplase, including IST-3, n=591), there was a significantly increased benefit of thrombolytics on outcome (odds ratio>1 indicates benefit) in patients with (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.64; P=0.011) versus without (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.35; P=0.566) arterial obstruction (P for interaction 0.017). CONCLUSIONS—: Intravenous thrombolytics provide benefit to stroke patients with computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography evidence of arterial obstruction, but the sample was underpowered to demonstrate significant treatment benefit or harm among patients with apparently patent arteries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5266422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52664222017-02-08 Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke Mair, Grant von Kummer, Rüdiger Adami, Alessandro White, Philip M. Adams, Matthew E. Yan, Bernard Demchuk, Andrew M. Farrall, Andrew J. Sellar, Robin J. Sakka, Eleni Palmer, Jeb Perry, David Lindley, Richard I. Sandercock, Peter A.G. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Stroke Original Contributions BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—: Computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are used increasingly to assess arterial patency in patients with ischemic stroke. We determined which baseline angiography features predict response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke using randomized controlled trial data. METHODS—: We analyzed angiograms from the IST-3 (Third International Stroke Trial), an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial of intravenous alteplase. Readers, masked to clinical, treatment, and outcome data, assessed prerandomization computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for presence, extent, location, and completeness of obstruction and collaterals. We compared angiography findings to 6-month functional outcome (Oxford Handicap Scale) and tested for interactions with alteplase, using ordinal regression in adjusted analyses. We also meta-analyzed all available angiography data from other randomized controlled trials of intravenous thrombolytics. RESULTS—: In IST-3, 300 patients had prerandomization angiography (computed tomographic angiography=271 and magnetic resonance angiography=29). On multivariable analysis, more extensive angiographic obstruction and poor collaterals independently predicted poor outcome (P<0.01). We identified no significant interaction between angiography findings and alteplase effect on Oxford Handicap Scale (P≥0.075) in IST-3. In meta-analysis (5 trials of alteplase or desmoteplase, including IST-3, n=591), there was a significantly increased benefit of thrombolytics on outcome (odds ratio>1 indicates benefit) in patients with (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.64; P=0.011) versus without (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.35; P=0.566) arterial obstruction (P for interaction 0.017). CONCLUSIONS—: Intravenous thrombolytics provide benefit to stroke patients with computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography evidence of arterial obstruction, but the sample was underpowered to demonstrate significant treatment benefit or harm among patients with apparently patent arteries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.isrctn.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-02 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5266422/ /pubmed/28008093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Mair, Grant von Kummer, Rüdiger Adami, Alessandro White, Philip M. Adams, Matthew E. Yan, Bernard Demchuk, Andrew M. Farrall, Andrew J. Sellar, Robin J. Sakka, Eleni Palmer, Jeb Perry, David Lindley, Richard I. Sandercock, Peter A.G. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke |
title | Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke |
title_full | Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke |
title_fullStr | Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke |
title_short | Arterial Obstruction on Computed Tomographic or Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Response to Intravenous Thrombolytics in Ischemic Stroke |
title_sort | arterial obstruction on computed tomographic or magnetic resonance angiography and response to intravenous thrombolytics in ischemic stroke |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mairgrant arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT vonkummerrudiger arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT adamialessandro arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT whitephilipm arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT adamsmatthewe arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT yanbernard arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT demchukandrewm arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT farrallandrewj arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT sellarrobinj arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT sakkaeleni arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT palmerjeb arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT perrydavid arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT lindleyrichardi arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT sandercockpeterag arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke AT wardlawjoannam arterialobstructiononcomputedtomographicormagneticresonanceangiographyandresponsetointravenousthrombolyticsinischemicstroke |