Cargando…

Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership

The increasing focus on high performance, patient-centered, team-based care calls for a strategy to evaluate cost-effective primary care. The trend toward physician practice consolidation further challenges the primary care health care system. Productivity measures establish provider value and help...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Essary, Alison C., Green, Ellen P., Gans, David N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392815624111
_version_ 1782500473112100864
author Essary, Alison C.
Green, Ellen P.
Gans, David N.
author_facet Essary, Alison C.
Green, Ellen P.
Gans, David N.
author_sort Essary, Alison C.
collection PubMed
description The increasing focus on high performance, patient-centered, team-based care calls for a strategy to evaluate cost-effective primary care. The trend toward physician practice consolidation further challenges the primary care health care system. Productivity measures establish provider value and help inform decision making regarding resource allocation in this evolving health care system. In this national survey of family medicine practices, physician assistant (PA) productivity, as defined by mean annual patient encounters, exceeds that of both nurse practitioners (NPs) and physicians in physician-owned practices and of NPs in hospital or integrated delivery system-owned practices. Total compensation, defined as salary, bonus, incentives, and honoraria for physicians, is significantly more compared to both PAs and NPs, regardless of practice ownership or productivity. Physician assistants and NPs earn equivalent compensation, regardless of practice ownership or productivity. Not only do these data support the value and role of PAs and NPs on the primary care team but also highlight differences in patient encounters between practice settings. Rural and underserved community practices, where physician-owned practices persist, also merit further consideration. Further research is needed to inform both organizational and policy decisions for the provision of high-quality, cost-effective, and accessible primary health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5266448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52664482017-05-01 Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership Essary, Alison C. Green, Ellen P. Gans, David N. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Pilot Studies The increasing focus on high performance, patient-centered, team-based care calls for a strategy to evaluate cost-effective primary care. The trend toward physician practice consolidation further challenges the primary care health care system. Productivity measures establish provider value and help inform decision making regarding resource allocation in this evolving health care system. In this national survey of family medicine practices, physician assistant (PA) productivity, as defined by mean annual patient encounters, exceeds that of both nurse practitioners (NPs) and physicians in physician-owned practices and of NPs in hospital or integrated delivery system-owned practices. Total compensation, defined as salary, bonus, incentives, and honoraria for physicians, is significantly more compared to both PAs and NPs, regardless of practice ownership or productivity. Physician assistants and NPs earn equivalent compensation, regardless of practice ownership or productivity. Not only do these data support the value and role of PAs and NPs on the primary care team but also highlight differences in patient encounters between practice settings. Rural and underserved community practices, where physician-owned practices persist, also merit further consideration. Further research is needed to inform both organizational and policy decisions for the provision of high-quality, cost-effective, and accessible primary health care. SAGE Publications 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5266448/ /pubmed/28462272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392815624111 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Pilot Studies
Essary, Alison C.
Green, Ellen P.
Gans, David N.
Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership
title Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership
title_full Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership
title_fullStr Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership
title_full_unstemmed Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership
title_short Compensation and Production in Family Medicine by Practice Ownership
title_sort compensation and production in family medicine by practice ownership
topic Pilot Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392815624111
work_keys_str_mv AT essaryalisonc compensationandproductioninfamilymedicinebypracticeownership
AT greenellenp compensationandproductioninfamilymedicinebypracticeownership
AT gansdavidn compensationandproductioninfamilymedicinebypracticeownership