Cargando…

Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges

BACKGROUND: Nigeria has a high population density but a weak health-care system. To improve the quality of care, 3 organizations carried out a quality improvement pilot intervention at the primary health-care level in selected rural areas. OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in quality of care in primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ugo, Okoli, Ezinne, Eze-Ajoku, Modupe, Oludipe, Nicole, Spieker, Winifred, Ekezie, Kelechi, Ohiri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392816662581
_version_ 1782500475414773760
author Ugo, Okoli
Ezinne, Eze-Ajoku
Modupe, Oludipe
Nicole, Spieker
Winifred, Ekezie
Kelechi, Ohiri
author_facet Ugo, Okoli
Ezinne, Eze-Ajoku
Modupe, Oludipe
Nicole, Spieker
Winifred, Ekezie
Kelechi, Ohiri
author_sort Ugo, Okoli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nigeria has a high population density but a weak health-care system. To improve the quality of care, 3 organizations carried out a quality improvement pilot intervention at the primary health-care level in selected rural areas. OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in quality of care in primary health-care facilities in rural Nigeria following the provision of technical governance support and to document the successes and challenges encountered. METHOD: A total of 6 states were selected across the 6 geopolitical zones of the country. However, assessments were carried out in 40 facilities in only 5 states. Selection was based on location, coverage, and minimum services offered. The facilities were divided randomly into 2 groups. The treatment group received quality-of-care assessment, continuous feedback, and improvement support, whereas the control group received quality assessment and no other support. Data were collected using the SafeCare Healthcare Standards and managed on the SafeCare Data Management System—AfriDB. Eight core areas were assessed at baseline and end line, and compliance to quality health-care standards was compared. RESULT: Outcomes from 40 facilities were accepted and analyzed. Overall scores increased in the treatment facilities compared to the control facilities, with strong evidence of improvement (t = 5.28, P = .0004) and 11% average improvement, but no clear pattern of improvement emerged in the control group. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated governance support and active community involvement offered potential for quality improvement in primary health-care facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5266458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52664582017-05-01 Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges Ugo, Okoli Ezinne, Eze-Ajoku Modupe, Oludipe Nicole, Spieker Winifred, Ekezie Kelechi, Ohiri Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Nigeria has a high population density but a weak health-care system. To improve the quality of care, 3 organizations carried out a quality improvement pilot intervention at the primary health-care level in selected rural areas. OBJECTIVE: To assess the change in quality of care in primary health-care facilities in rural Nigeria following the provision of technical governance support and to document the successes and challenges encountered. METHOD: A total of 6 states were selected across the 6 geopolitical zones of the country. However, assessments were carried out in 40 facilities in only 5 states. Selection was based on location, coverage, and minimum services offered. The facilities were divided randomly into 2 groups. The treatment group received quality-of-care assessment, continuous feedback, and improvement support, whereas the control group received quality assessment and no other support. Data were collected using the SafeCare Healthcare Standards and managed on the SafeCare Data Management System—AfriDB. Eight core areas were assessed at baseline and end line, and compliance to quality health-care standards was compared. RESULT: Outcomes from 40 facilities were accepted and analyzed. Overall scores increased in the treatment facilities compared to the control facilities, with strong evidence of improvement (t = 5.28, P = .0004) and 11% average improvement, but no clear pattern of improvement emerged in the control group. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated governance support and active community involvement offered potential for quality improvement in primary health-care facilities. SAGE Publications 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5266458/ /pubmed/28462280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392816662581 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ugo, Okoli
Ezinne, Eze-Ajoku
Modupe, Oludipe
Nicole, Spieker
Winifred, Ekezie
Kelechi, Ohiri
Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges
title Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges
title_full Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges
title_fullStr Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges
title_short Improving Quality of Care in Primary Health-Care Facilities in Rural Nigeria: Successes and Challenges
title_sort improving quality of care in primary health-care facilities in rural nigeria: successes and challenges
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333392816662581
work_keys_str_mv AT ugookoli improvingqualityofcareinprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinruralnigeriasuccessesandchallenges
AT ezinneezeajoku improvingqualityofcareinprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinruralnigeriasuccessesandchallenges
AT modupeoludipe improvingqualityofcareinprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinruralnigeriasuccessesandchallenges
AT nicolespieker improvingqualityofcareinprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinruralnigeriasuccessesandchallenges
AT winifredekezie improvingqualityofcareinprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinruralnigeriasuccessesandchallenges
AT kelechiohiri improvingqualityofcareinprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinruralnigeriasuccessesandchallenges