Cargando…

A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936

INTRODUCTION: Various methods are available to measure hippocampal atrophy rate. We compared methods to predict Alzheimer's dementia. METHODS: Participants with brain imaging at ages 69 and 73 years were identified from a previous study. Simple manual measures and computationally automated volu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rana, Arnab K., Sandu, Anca-Larisa, Robertson, Kenna L., McNeil, Christopher J., Whalley, Lawrence J., Staff, Roger T., Murray, Alison D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.007
_version_ 1782500478384340992
author Rana, Arnab K.
Sandu, Anca-Larisa
Robertson, Kenna L.
McNeil, Christopher J.
Whalley, Lawrence J.
Staff, Roger T.
Murray, Alison D.
author_facet Rana, Arnab K.
Sandu, Anca-Larisa
Robertson, Kenna L.
McNeil, Christopher J.
Whalley, Lawrence J.
Staff, Roger T.
Murray, Alison D.
author_sort Rana, Arnab K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Various methods are available to measure hippocampal atrophy rate. We compared methods to predict Alzheimer's dementia. METHODS: Participants with brain imaging at ages 69 and 73 years were identified from a previous study. Simple manual measures and computationally automated volumetry were performed. Receiver operating characteristics assessed the predictive ability of each method at baseline and on logit regression analysis of two serial scans. RESULTS: Ten of 149 participants developed Alzheimer's dementia and had lower baseline volumes (3647 vs. 4194 mm(3)P = .002), rates of volume loss (−126 vs. −36 mm(3)/y; P = .001), and rates of loss in hippocampal fraction (−8.55 vs. −2.35 x 10(−5)/y; P = .001). Baseline volume with a rate of change gave the highest area under the curve value of 0.96. DISCUSSION: Automated volumetry measuring hippocampal size at age 69 years and subsequent rate of change predicts Alzheimer's dementia development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5266475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52664752017-02-01 A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 Rana, Arnab K. Sandu, Anca-Larisa Robertson, Kenna L. McNeil, Christopher J. Whalley, Lawrence J. Staff, Roger T. Murray, Alison D. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) PART II. State of the Field: Advances in Neuroimaging from the 2016 Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium INTRODUCTION: Various methods are available to measure hippocampal atrophy rate. We compared methods to predict Alzheimer's dementia. METHODS: Participants with brain imaging at ages 69 and 73 years were identified from a previous study. Simple manual measures and computationally automated volumetry were performed. Receiver operating characteristics assessed the predictive ability of each method at baseline and on logit regression analysis of two serial scans. RESULTS: Ten of 149 participants developed Alzheimer's dementia and had lower baseline volumes (3647 vs. 4194 mm(3)P = .002), rates of volume loss (−126 vs. −36 mm(3)/y; P = .001), and rates of loss in hippocampal fraction (−8.55 vs. −2.35 x 10(−5)/y; P = .001). Baseline volume with a rate of change gave the highest area under the curve value of 0.96. DISCUSSION: Automated volumetry measuring hippocampal size at age 69 years and subsequent rate of change predicts Alzheimer's dementia development. Elsevier 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5266475/ /pubmed/28149941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.007 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle PART II. State of the Field: Advances in Neuroimaging from the 2016 Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium
Rana, Arnab K.
Sandu, Anca-Larisa
Robertson, Kenna L.
McNeil, Christopher J.
Whalley, Lawrence J.
Staff, Roger T.
Murray, Alison D.
A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936
title A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936
title_full A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936
title_fullStr A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936
title_short A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936
title_sort comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting alzheimer's dementia in the aberdeen birth cohort of 1936
topic PART II. State of the Field: Advances in Neuroimaging from the 2016 Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.007
work_keys_str_mv AT ranaarnabk acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT sanduancalarisa acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT robertsonkennal acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT mcneilchristopherj acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT whalleylawrencej acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT staffrogert acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT murrayalisond acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT ranaarnabk comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT sanduancalarisa comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT robertsonkennal comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT mcneilchristopherj comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT whalleylawrencej comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT staffrogert comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936
AT murrayalisond comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936