Cargando…
A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936
INTRODUCTION: Various methods are available to measure hippocampal atrophy rate. We compared methods to predict Alzheimer's dementia. METHODS: Participants with brain imaging at ages 69 and 73 years were identified from a previous study. Simple manual measures and computationally automated volu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.007 |
_version_ | 1782500478384340992 |
---|---|
author | Rana, Arnab K. Sandu, Anca-Larisa Robertson, Kenna L. McNeil, Christopher J. Whalley, Lawrence J. Staff, Roger T. Murray, Alison D. |
author_facet | Rana, Arnab K. Sandu, Anca-Larisa Robertson, Kenna L. McNeil, Christopher J. Whalley, Lawrence J. Staff, Roger T. Murray, Alison D. |
author_sort | Rana, Arnab K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Various methods are available to measure hippocampal atrophy rate. We compared methods to predict Alzheimer's dementia. METHODS: Participants with brain imaging at ages 69 and 73 years were identified from a previous study. Simple manual measures and computationally automated volumetry were performed. Receiver operating characteristics assessed the predictive ability of each method at baseline and on logit regression analysis of two serial scans. RESULTS: Ten of 149 participants developed Alzheimer's dementia and had lower baseline volumes (3647 vs. 4194 mm(3)P = .002), rates of volume loss (−126 vs. −36 mm(3)/y; P = .001), and rates of loss in hippocampal fraction (−8.55 vs. −2.35 x 10(−5)/y; P = .001). Baseline volume with a rate of change gave the highest area under the curve value of 0.96. DISCUSSION: Automated volumetry measuring hippocampal size at age 69 years and subsequent rate of change predicts Alzheimer's dementia development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5266475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52664752017-02-01 A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 Rana, Arnab K. Sandu, Anca-Larisa Robertson, Kenna L. McNeil, Christopher J. Whalley, Lawrence J. Staff, Roger T. Murray, Alison D. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) PART II. State of the Field: Advances in Neuroimaging from the 2016 Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium INTRODUCTION: Various methods are available to measure hippocampal atrophy rate. We compared methods to predict Alzheimer's dementia. METHODS: Participants with brain imaging at ages 69 and 73 years were identified from a previous study. Simple manual measures and computationally automated volumetry were performed. Receiver operating characteristics assessed the predictive ability of each method at baseline and on logit regression analysis of two serial scans. RESULTS: Ten of 149 participants developed Alzheimer's dementia and had lower baseline volumes (3647 vs. 4194 mm(3)P = .002), rates of volume loss (−126 vs. −36 mm(3)/y; P = .001), and rates of loss in hippocampal fraction (−8.55 vs. −2.35 x 10(−5)/y; P = .001). Baseline volume with a rate of change gave the highest area under the curve value of 0.96. DISCUSSION: Automated volumetry measuring hippocampal size at age 69 years and subsequent rate of change predicts Alzheimer's dementia development. Elsevier 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5266475/ /pubmed/28149941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.007 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | PART II. State of the Field: Advances in Neuroimaging from the 2016 Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium Rana, Arnab K. Sandu, Anca-Larisa Robertson, Kenna L. McNeil, Christopher J. Whalley, Lawrence J. Staff, Roger T. Murray, Alison D. A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 |
title | A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 |
title_full | A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 |
title_fullStr | A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 |
title_short | A comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting Alzheimer's dementia in the Aberdeen Birth Cohort of 1936 |
title_sort | comparison of measurement methods of hippocampal atrophy rate for predicting alzheimer's dementia in the aberdeen birth cohort of 1936 |
topic | PART II. State of the Field: Advances in Neuroimaging from the 2016 Alzheimer's Imaging Consortium |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5266475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2016.11.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranaarnabk acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT sanduancalarisa acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT robertsonkennal acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT mcneilchristopherj acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT whalleylawrencej acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT staffrogert acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT murrayalisond acomparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT ranaarnabk comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT sanduancalarisa comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT robertsonkennal comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT mcneilchristopherj comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT whalleylawrencej comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT staffrogert comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 AT murrayalisond comparisonofmeasurementmethodsofhippocampalatrophyrateforpredictingalzheimersdementiaintheaberdeenbirthcohortof1936 |