Cargando…

Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel

BACKGROUND: Titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) and stainless steel (SS) wires are commonly used in orthodontics as arch-wires for tooth movement. However, plastic deformation phenomenon in these arch-wires seems to be a major concern among orthodontists. This study aimed to compare the mechanical prope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheibaninia, Ahmad, Salehi, Anahita, Asatourian, Armen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5268101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53274
_version_ 1782500746590158848
author Sheibaninia, Ahmad
Salehi, Anahita
Asatourian, Armen
author_facet Sheibaninia, Ahmad
Salehi, Anahita
Asatourian, Armen
author_sort Sheibaninia, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) and stainless steel (SS) wires are commonly used in orthodontics as arch-wires for tooth movement. However, plastic deformation phenomenon in these arch-wires seems to be a major concern among orthodontists. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of TMA and SS wires with different dimensions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two wire samples (36 TMA and 36 SS) of three different sizes (19×25, 17×25 and 16×22) were analyzed in vitro, with 12 samples in each group. Various mechanical properties of the wires, including spring-back, bending moment and stiffness were determined using a universal testing machine. Student’s t-test showed statistically significant differences in the mean values of all the groups. In addition, metallographic comparison of SS and TMA wires was conducted under an optical microscope. RESULTS: The degree of stiffness of 16×22-sized SS and TMA springs was found to be 12±2 and 5±0.4, respectively, while the bending moment was estimated to be 1927±352 (gm-mm) and 932±16 (gm-mm), respectively; the spring-back index was determined to be 0.61±0.2 and 0.4±.09, respectively (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in spring-back index in larger dimensions of the wires. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic analysis indicated that springs made of TMA were superior compared to those made of SS. Although both from economic and functionality viewpoints the use of TMA is suggested, further clinical investigations are recommended. Key words:Bending moment, optical microscope, spring-back, stainless steel, stiffness, titanium‒molybdenum alloy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5268101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52681012017-02-01 Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel Sheibaninia, Ahmad Salehi, Anahita Asatourian, Armen J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) and stainless steel (SS) wires are commonly used in orthodontics as arch-wires for tooth movement. However, plastic deformation phenomenon in these arch-wires seems to be a major concern among orthodontists. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties of TMA and SS wires with different dimensions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two wire samples (36 TMA and 36 SS) of three different sizes (19×25, 17×25 and 16×22) were analyzed in vitro, with 12 samples in each group. Various mechanical properties of the wires, including spring-back, bending moment and stiffness were determined using a universal testing machine. Student’s t-test showed statistically significant differences in the mean values of all the groups. In addition, metallographic comparison of SS and TMA wires was conducted under an optical microscope. RESULTS: The degree of stiffness of 16×22-sized SS and TMA springs was found to be 12±2 and 5±0.4, respectively, while the bending moment was estimated to be 1927±352 (gm-mm) and 932±16 (gm-mm), respectively; the spring-back index was determined to be 0.61±0.2 and 0.4±.09, respectively (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in spring-back index in larger dimensions of the wires. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic analysis indicated that springs made of TMA were superior compared to those made of SS. Although both from economic and functionality viewpoints the use of TMA is suggested, further clinical investigations are recommended. Key words:Bending moment, optical microscope, spring-back, stainless steel, stiffness, titanium‒molybdenum alloy. Medicina Oral S.L. 2017-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5268101/ /pubmed/28149469 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53274 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sheibaninia, Ahmad
Salehi, Anahita
Asatourian, Armen
Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel
title Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel
title_full Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel
title_fullStr Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel
title_short Comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel
title_sort comparison of spring characteristics of titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless steel
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5268101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53274
work_keys_str_mv AT sheibaniniaahmad comparisonofspringcharacteristicsoftitaniummolybdenumalloyandstainlesssteel
AT salehianahita comparisonofspringcharacteristicsoftitaniummolybdenumalloyandstainlesssteel
AT asatourianarmen comparisonofspringcharacteristicsoftitaniummolybdenumalloyandstainlesssteel