Cargando…
Losses and External Outcomes Interact to Produce the Gambler’s Fallacy
When making serial predictions in a binary decision task, there is a clear tendency to assume that after a series of the same external outcome (e.g., heads in a coin flip), the next outcome will be the opposing one (e.g., tails), even when the outcomes are independent of one another. This so-called...
Autores principales: | Mossbridge, Julia A., Roney, Christopher J. R., Suzuki, Satoru |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5268496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170057 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The gambler’s fallacy in problem and non-problem gamblers
por: Matarazzo, Olimpia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Who “Believes” in the Gambler’s Fallacy and Why?
por: Farmer, George D., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The Gambler’s Fallacy: A Basic Inhibitory Process?
por: Lyons, James, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler's Fallacy Reasoning
por: Rao, Kariyushi, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The Gambler’s Fallacy Is Associated with Weak Affective Decision Making but Strong Cognitive Ability
por: Xue, Gui, et al.
Publicado: (2012)