Cargando…

In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bacterial biofilms play a major role in the etiology of periodontal and peri-implant diseases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the removal of bacterial biofilms and attachment of epithelial cells (EC), gingival fibroblasts (GF) and osteoblast-like cells (OC) to dentin and ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eick, Sigrun, Meier, Ivan, Spoerlé, Florian, Bender, Philip, Aoki, Akira, Izumi, Yuichi, Salvi, Giovanni E., Sculean, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5268770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171086
_version_ 1782500878429716480
author Eick, Sigrun
Meier, Ivan
Spoerlé, Florian
Bender, Philip
Aoki, Akira
Izumi, Yuichi
Salvi, Giovanni E.
Sculean, Anton
author_facet Eick, Sigrun
Meier, Ivan
Spoerlé, Florian
Bender, Philip
Aoki, Akira
Izumi, Yuichi
Salvi, Giovanni E.
Sculean, Anton
author_sort Eick, Sigrun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bacterial biofilms play a major role in the etiology of periodontal and peri-implant diseases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the removal of bacterial biofilms and attachment of epithelial cells (EC), gingival fibroblasts (GF) and osteoblast-like cells (OC) to dentin and titanium surfaces after Er:YAG laser (Er:YAG) in comparison with other treatment methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multi-species bacterial biofilms were grown on standardized dentin and titanium specimens with a sand-blasted and acid etched (SLA) surface for 3.5 d. Thereafter, the specimens were placed into artificially-created pockets. The following methods for biofilm removal were used: 1) Gracey (dentin) or titanium curettes (CUR), 2) Er:YAG, 3) photodynamic therapy (PDT) and 4) CUR with adjunctive PDT (CUR/PDT). Colony forming units (CFUs) of the remaining biofilms and attachment of EC, GF and OC were determined. Statistical analysis was performed by means of ANOVA with post-hoc LSD. RESULTS: All treatment methods decreased statistically significantly (p<0.001) total CFUs in biofilms compared with untreated dentin and titanium surfaces respectively. On dentin, Er:YAG was equally efficient as CUR and PDT but inferior to CUR/PDT (p = 0.005). On titanium, surfaces, the use of Er:YAG resulted in statistically significantly superior biofilm removal compared to the 3 other treatments (each p<0.001). Counts of attached EC, GF and OC were the lowest on untreated contaminated dentin and titanium surfaces each. After CUR/PDT higher EC counts were found on dentin (p = 0.006). On titanium, all decontamination methods statistically significantly increased (p<0.001) the counts of attached EC without differences between groups. Statistically significantly higher counts of GF (p = 0.024) and OC (p<0.001) were observed after Er:YAG decontamination compared with untreated surfaces. CONCLUSION: Ablation of subgingival biofilms and in particular decontamination of titanium implant surfaces with an Er:YAG laser seem to be a promising approach and warrants further investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5268770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52687702017-02-06 In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces Eick, Sigrun Meier, Ivan Spoerlé, Florian Bender, Philip Aoki, Akira Izumi, Yuichi Salvi, Giovanni E. Sculean, Anton PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bacterial biofilms play a major role in the etiology of periodontal and peri-implant diseases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the removal of bacterial biofilms and attachment of epithelial cells (EC), gingival fibroblasts (GF) and osteoblast-like cells (OC) to dentin and titanium surfaces after Er:YAG laser (Er:YAG) in comparison with other treatment methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multi-species bacterial biofilms were grown on standardized dentin and titanium specimens with a sand-blasted and acid etched (SLA) surface for 3.5 d. Thereafter, the specimens were placed into artificially-created pockets. The following methods for biofilm removal were used: 1) Gracey (dentin) or titanium curettes (CUR), 2) Er:YAG, 3) photodynamic therapy (PDT) and 4) CUR with adjunctive PDT (CUR/PDT). Colony forming units (CFUs) of the remaining biofilms and attachment of EC, GF and OC were determined. Statistical analysis was performed by means of ANOVA with post-hoc LSD. RESULTS: All treatment methods decreased statistically significantly (p<0.001) total CFUs in biofilms compared with untreated dentin and titanium surfaces respectively. On dentin, Er:YAG was equally efficient as CUR and PDT but inferior to CUR/PDT (p = 0.005). On titanium, surfaces, the use of Er:YAG resulted in statistically significantly superior biofilm removal compared to the 3 other treatments (each p<0.001). Counts of attached EC, GF and OC were the lowest on untreated contaminated dentin and titanium surfaces each. After CUR/PDT higher EC counts were found on dentin (p = 0.006). On titanium, all decontamination methods statistically significantly increased (p<0.001) the counts of attached EC without differences between groups. Statistically significantly higher counts of GF (p = 0.024) and OC (p<0.001) were observed after Er:YAG decontamination compared with untreated surfaces. CONCLUSION: Ablation of subgingival biofilms and in particular decontamination of titanium implant surfaces with an Er:YAG laser seem to be a promising approach and warrants further investigations. Public Library of Science 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5268770/ /pubmed/28125700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171086 Text en © 2017 Eick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eick, Sigrun
Meier, Ivan
Spoerlé, Florian
Bender, Philip
Aoki, Akira
Izumi, Yuichi
Salvi, Giovanni E.
Sculean, Anton
In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces
title In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces
title_full In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces
title_fullStr In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces
title_short In Vitro-Activity of Er:YAG Laser in Comparison with other Treatment Modalities on Biofilm Ablation from Implant and Tooth Surfaces
title_sort in vitro-activity of er:yag laser in comparison with other treatment modalities on biofilm ablation from implant and tooth surfaces
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5268770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171086
work_keys_str_mv AT eicksigrun invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces
AT meierivan invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces
AT spoerleflorian invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces
AT benderphilip invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces
AT aokiakira invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces
AT izumiyuichi invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces
AT salvigiovannie invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces
AT sculeananton invitroactivityoferyaglaserincomparisonwithothertreatmentmodalitiesonbiofilmablationfromimplantandtoothsurfaces