Cargando…

A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats

In this study, we aim to quantify the differences in lung metrics measured in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rodents using respiratory‐gated micro‐computed tomography. Healthy male Sprague‐Dawley rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine and scanned with a retrospective respiratory g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ford, Nancy L., McCaig, Lynda, Jeklin, Andrew, Lewis, James F., Veldhuizen, Ruud A. W., Holdsworth, David W., Drangova, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5269405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100723
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13074
_version_ 1782501004390957056
author Ford, Nancy L.
McCaig, Lynda
Jeklin, Andrew
Lewis, James F.
Veldhuizen, Ruud A. W.
Holdsworth, David W.
Drangova, Maria
author_facet Ford, Nancy L.
McCaig, Lynda
Jeklin, Andrew
Lewis, James F.
Veldhuizen, Ruud A. W.
Holdsworth, David W.
Drangova, Maria
author_sort Ford, Nancy L.
collection PubMed
description In this study, we aim to quantify the differences in lung metrics measured in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rodents using respiratory‐gated micro‐computed tomography. Healthy male Sprague‐Dawley rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine and scanned with a retrospective respiratory gating protocol on a GE Locus Ultra micro‐CT scanner. Each animal was scanned while free‐breathing, then intubated and mechanically ventilated (MV) and rescanned with a standard ventilation protocol (56 bpm, 8 mL/kg and PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O) and again with a ventilation protocol that approximates the free‐breathing parameters (88 bpm, 2.14 mL/kg and PEEP of 2.5 cm H(2)O). Images were reconstructed representing inspiration and end expiration with 0.15 mm voxel spacing. Image‐based measurements of the lung lengths, airway diameters, lung volume, and air content were compared and used to calculate the functional residual capacity (FRC) and tidal volume. Images acquired during MV appeared darker in the airspaces and the airways appeared larger. Image‐based measurements showed an increase in lung volume and air content during standard MV, for both respiratory phases, compared with matched MV and free‐breathing. Comparisons of the functional metrics showed an increase in FRC for mechanically ventilated rats, but only the standard MV exhibited a significantly higher tidal volume than free‐breathing or matched MV. Although standard mechanical ventilation protocols may be useful in promoting consistent respiratory patterns, the amount of air in the lungs is higher than in free‐breathing animals. Matching the respiratory patterns with the free‐breathing case allowed similar lung morphology and physiology measurements while reducing the variability in the measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5269405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52694052017-02-01 A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats Ford, Nancy L. McCaig, Lynda Jeklin, Andrew Lewis, James F. Veldhuizen, Ruud A. W. Holdsworth, David W. Drangova, Maria Physiol Rep Original Research In this study, we aim to quantify the differences in lung metrics measured in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rodents using respiratory‐gated micro‐computed tomography. Healthy male Sprague‐Dawley rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine and scanned with a retrospective respiratory gating protocol on a GE Locus Ultra micro‐CT scanner. Each animal was scanned while free‐breathing, then intubated and mechanically ventilated (MV) and rescanned with a standard ventilation protocol (56 bpm, 8 mL/kg and PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O) and again with a ventilation protocol that approximates the free‐breathing parameters (88 bpm, 2.14 mL/kg and PEEP of 2.5 cm H(2)O). Images were reconstructed representing inspiration and end expiration with 0.15 mm voxel spacing. Image‐based measurements of the lung lengths, airway diameters, lung volume, and air content were compared and used to calculate the functional residual capacity (FRC) and tidal volume. Images acquired during MV appeared darker in the airspaces and the airways appeared larger. Image‐based measurements showed an increase in lung volume and air content during standard MV, for both respiratory phases, compared with matched MV and free‐breathing. Comparisons of the functional metrics showed an increase in FRC for mechanically ventilated rats, but only the standard MV exhibited a significantly higher tidal volume than free‐breathing or matched MV. Although standard mechanical ventilation protocols may be useful in promoting consistent respiratory patterns, the amount of air in the lungs is higher than in free‐breathing animals. Matching the respiratory patterns with the free‐breathing case allowed similar lung morphology and physiology measurements while reducing the variability in the measurements. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5269405/ /pubmed/28100723 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13074 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ford, Nancy L.
McCaig, Lynda
Jeklin, Andrew
Lewis, James F.
Veldhuizen, Ruud A. W.
Holdsworth, David W.
Drangova, Maria
A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats
title A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats
title_full A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats
title_fullStr A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats
title_full_unstemmed A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats
title_short A respiratory‐gated micro‐CT comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats
title_sort respiratory‐gated micro‐ct comparison of respiratory patterns in free‐breathing and mechanically ventilated rats
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5269405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28100723
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13074
work_keys_str_mv AT fordnancyl arespiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT mccaiglynda arespiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT jeklinandrew arespiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT lewisjamesf arespiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT veldhuizenruudaw arespiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT holdsworthdavidw arespiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT drangovamaria arespiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT fordnancyl respiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT mccaiglynda respiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT jeklinandrew respiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT lewisjamesf respiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT veldhuizenruudaw respiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT holdsworthdavidw respiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats
AT drangovamaria respiratorygatedmicroctcomparisonofrespiratorypatternsinfreebreathingandmechanicallyventilatedrats