Cargando…
Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study
BACKGROUND: One goal of therapeutic ultrasound is enabling heat generation in tissue. Ultrasound application protocols typically neglect these processes of absorption and backscatter/reflection at the skin/fat, fat/muscle, and muscle/bone interfaces. The aim of this study was to investigate the heat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0086-y |
_version_ | 1782501143333568512 |
---|---|
author | Omena, Thaís Pionório Fontes-Pereira, Aldo José Costa, Rejane Medeiros Simões, Ricardo Jorge von Krüger, Marco Antônio Pereira, Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque |
author_facet | Omena, Thaís Pionório Fontes-Pereira, Aldo José Costa, Rejane Medeiros Simões, Ricardo Jorge von Krüger, Marco Antônio Pereira, Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque |
author_sort | Omena, Thaís Pionório |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One goal of therapeutic ultrasound is enabling heat generation in tissue. Ultrasound application protocols typically neglect these processes of absorption and backscatter/reflection at the skin/fat, fat/muscle, and muscle/bone interfaces. The aim of this study was to investigate the heating process at interfaces close to the transducer and the bone with the aid of computer simulation and tissue-mimicking materials (phantoms). METHODS: The experimental setup consists of physiotherapeutic ultrasound equipment for irradiation, two layers of soft tissue-mimicking material, and one with and one without an additional layer of bone-mimicking material. Thermocouple monitoring is used in both cases. A computational model is used with the experimental parameters in a COMSOL® software platform. RESULTS: The experimental results show significant temperature rise (42 °C) at 10 mm depth, regardless of bone layer presence, diverging 3 °C from the simulated values. The probable causes are thermocouple and transducer heating and interface reverberations. There was no statistical difference in the experimental results with and without the cortical bone for the central thermocouple of the first interface [t(38) = −1.52; 95% CI = −0.85, 0.12; p = 14]. Temperature rise (>6 °C) close to the bone layer was lower than predicted (>21 °C), possibly because without the bone layer, thermocouples at 30 mm make contact with the water bath and convection intensifies heat loss; this factor was omitted in the simulation model. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that more attention should be given to soft tissue layer interfaces in ultrasound therapeutic procedures even in the absence of a close bone layer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5270207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52702072017-02-01 Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study Omena, Thaís Pionório Fontes-Pereira, Aldo José Costa, Rejane Medeiros Simões, Ricardo Jorge von Krüger, Marco Antônio Pereira, Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque J Ther Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: One goal of therapeutic ultrasound is enabling heat generation in tissue. Ultrasound application protocols typically neglect these processes of absorption and backscatter/reflection at the skin/fat, fat/muscle, and muscle/bone interfaces. The aim of this study was to investigate the heating process at interfaces close to the transducer and the bone with the aid of computer simulation and tissue-mimicking materials (phantoms). METHODS: The experimental setup consists of physiotherapeutic ultrasound equipment for irradiation, two layers of soft tissue-mimicking material, and one with and one without an additional layer of bone-mimicking material. Thermocouple monitoring is used in both cases. A computational model is used with the experimental parameters in a COMSOL® software platform. RESULTS: The experimental results show significant temperature rise (42 °C) at 10 mm depth, regardless of bone layer presence, diverging 3 °C from the simulated values. The probable causes are thermocouple and transducer heating and interface reverberations. There was no statistical difference in the experimental results with and without the cortical bone for the central thermocouple of the first interface [t(38) = −1.52; 95% CI = −0.85, 0.12; p = 14]. Temperature rise (>6 °C) close to the bone layer was lower than predicted (>21 °C), possibly because without the bone layer, thermocouples at 30 mm make contact with the water bath and convection intensifies heat loss; this factor was omitted in the simulation model. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that more attention should be given to soft tissue layer interfaces in ultrasound therapeutic procedures even in the absence of a close bone layer. BioMed Central 2017-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5270207/ /pubmed/28149518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0086-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Omena, Thaís Pionório Fontes-Pereira, Aldo José Costa, Rejane Medeiros Simões, Ricardo Jorge von Krüger, Marco Antônio Pereira, Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study |
title | Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study |
title_full | Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study |
title_fullStr | Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study |
title_short | Why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study |
title_sort | why we should care about soft tissue interfaces when applying ultrasonic diathermy: an experimental and computer simulation study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-017-0086-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omenathaispionorio whyweshouldcareaboutsofttissueinterfaceswhenapplyingultrasonicdiathermyanexperimentalandcomputersimulationstudy AT fontespereiraaldojose whyweshouldcareaboutsofttissueinterfaceswhenapplyingultrasonicdiathermyanexperimentalandcomputersimulationstudy AT costarejanemedeiros whyweshouldcareaboutsofttissueinterfaceswhenapplyingultrasonicdiathermyanexperimentalandcomputersimulationstudy AT simoesricardojorge whyweshouldcareaboutsofttissueinterfaceswhenapplyingultrasonicdiathermyanexperimentalandcomputersimulationstudy AT vonkrugermarcoantonio whyweshouldcareaboutsofttissueinterfaceswhenapplyingultrasonicdiathermyanexperimentalandcomputersimulationstudy AT pereirawagnercoelhodealbuquerque whyweshouldcareaboutsofttissueinterfaceswhenapplyingultrasonicdiathermyanexperimentalandcomputersimulationstudy |