Cargando…

Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Dementia and cognitive impairment could severely impact patients’ life and bring heavy burden to patients, caregivers and societies. Some interventions are suggested for the older patients with these conditions to help them live well, but economic evaluation is needed to assess the cost-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Fan, Dawes, Piers, Leroi, Iracema, Gannon, Brenda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0418-6
_version_ 1782501148506193920
author Yang, Fan
Dawes, Piers
Leroi, Iracema
Gannon, Brenda
author_facet Yang, Fan
Dawes, Piers
Leroi, Iracema
Gannon, Brenda
author_sort Yang, Fan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dementia and cognitive impairment could severely impact patients’ life and bring heavy burden to patients, caregivers and societies. Some interventions are suggested for the older patients with these conditions to help them live well, but economic evaluation is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Trial-based economic evaluation is an ideal method; however, little is known about the tools used to collect data of resource use and quality of life alongside the trials. Therefore, the aim of this review is to identify and describe the resource use and quality of life instruments in clinical trials of interventions for older patients with dementia or cognitive impairment. METHODS: We will perform a search in main electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and Scopus) using the key terms or their synonyms: older, dementia, cognitive impairment, cost, quality of life, intervention and tools. After removing duplicates, two independent reviewers will screen each entry for eligibility, initially by title and abstract, then by full-text. A hand search of the references of included articles and general search, e.g. Google Scholar, will also be conducted to identify potential relevant studies. All disagreements will be resolved by discussion or consultation with a third reviewer if necessary. Data analysis will be completed and reported in a narrative review. DISCUSSION: This review will identify the instruments used in clinical trials to collect resource use and quality of life data for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions. This will help to guide the study design of future trial-based economic evaluation of these interventions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016038495 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0418-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5270230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52702302017-02-01 Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review Yang, Fan Dawes, Piers Leroi, Iracema Gannon, Brenda Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Dementia and cognitive impairment could severely impact patients’ life and bring heavy burden to patients, caregivers and societies. Some interventions are suggested for the older patients with these conditions to help them live well, but economic evaluation is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Trial-based economic evaluation is an ideal method; however, little is known about the tools used to collect data of resource use and quality of life alongside the trials. Therefore, the aim of this review is to identify and describe the resource use and quality of life instruments in clinical trials of interventions for older patients with dementia or cognitive impairment. METHODS: We will perform a search in main electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and Scopus) using the key terms or their synonyms: older, dementia, cognitive impairment, cost, quality of life, intervention and tools. After removing duplicates, two independent reviewers will screen each entry for eligibility, initially by title and abstract, then by full-text. A hand search of the references of included articles and general search, e.g. Google Scholar, will also be conducted to identify potential relevant studies. All disagreements will be resolved by discussion or consultation with a third reviewer if necessary. Data analysis will be completed and reported in a narrative review. DISCUSSION: This review will identify the instruments used in clinical trials to collect resource use and quality of life data for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions. This will help to guide the study design of future trial-based economic evaluation of these interventions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016038495 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0418-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5270230/ /pubmed/28126009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0418-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Yang, Fan
Dawes, Piers
Leroi, Iracema
Gannon, Brenda
Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review
title Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review
title_full Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review
title_short Measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort measurement tools of resource use and quality of life in clinical trials for dementia or cognitive impairment interventions: protocol for a scoping review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0418-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yangfan measurementtoolsofresourceuseandqualityoflifeinclinicaltrialsfordementiaorcognitiveimpairmentinterventionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT dawespiers measurementtoolsofresourceuseandqualityoflifeinclinicaltrialsfordementiaorcognitiveimpairmentinterventionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT leroiiracema measurementtoolsofresourceuseandqualityoflifeinclinicaltrialsfordementiaorcognitiveimpairmentinterventionsprotocolforascopingreview
AT gannonbrenda measurementtoolsofresourceuseandqualityoflifeinclinicaltrialsfordementiaorcognitiveimpairmentinterventionsprotocolforascopingreview