Cargando…

Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study

BACKGROUND: In the nursing home population, it is estimated that 1 in every 3 patients is polymedicated and given their considerable frailty, these patients are especially prone to adverse drug reactions. Clinical pharmacist-led medication reviews are considered successful interventions to improve m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mestres Gonzalvo, Carlota, de Wit, Hugo A. J. M., van Oijen, Brigit P. C., Hurkens, Kim P. G. M., Janknegt, Rob, Schols, Jos M. G. A., Mulder, Wubbo J., Verhey, Frans R., Winkens, Bjorn, van der Kuy, Paul-Hugo M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0426-3
_version_ 1782501153327546368
author Mestres Gonzalvo, Carlota
de Wit, Hugo A. J. M.
van Oijen, Brigit P. C.
Hurkens, Kim P. G. M.
Janknegt, Rob
Schols, Jos M. G. A.
Mulder, Wubbo J.
Verhey, Frans R.
Winkens, Bjorn
van der Kuy, Paul-Hugo M.
author_facet Mestres Gonzalvo, Carlota
de Wit, Hugo A. J. M.
van Oijen, Brigit P. C.
Hurkens, Kim P. G. M.
Janknegt, Rob
Schols, Jos M. G. A.
Mulder, Wubbo J.
Verhey, Frans R.
Winkens, Bjorn
van der Kuy, Paul-Hugo M.
author_sort Mestres Gonzalvo, Carlota
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the nursing home population, it is estimated that 1 in every 3 patients is polymedicated and given their considerable frailty, these patients are especially prone to adverse drug reactions. Clinical pharmacist-led medication reviews are considered successful interventions to improve medication safety in the inpatient setting. Due to the limited available evidence concerning the benefits of medication reviews performed in the nursing home setting, we propose a study aiming to demonstrate a positive effect that a clinical decision support system, as a health care intervention, may have on the target population. The primary objective of this study is to reduce the number of patients with at least one event when using the clinical decision support system compared to the regular care. These events consist of hospital referrals, delirium, falls, and/or deaths. METHOD/DESIGN: This study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised study with a cluster group design. The randomisation will be per main nursing home physician and stratified per ward (somatic and psychogeriatric). In the intervention group the clinical decision support system will be used to screen medication list, laboratory values and medical history in order to obtain potential clinical relevant remarks. The remarks will be sent to the main physician and feedback will be provided whether the advice was followed or not. In the control group regular care will be applied. DISCUSSION: We strongly believe that by using a clinical decision support system, medication reviews are performed in a standardised way which leads to comparable results between patients. In addition, using a clinical decision support system eliminates the time factor to perform medication reviews as the major problems related to medication, laboratory values, indications and/or established patient characteristics will be directly available. In this way, and in order to make the medication review process complete, consultation within healthcare professionals and/or the patient itself will be time effective and the medication surveillance could be performed around the clock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR5165. Registered 2nd April 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5270253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52702532017-02-01 Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study Mestres Gonzalvo, Carlota de Wit, Hugo A. J. M. van Oijen, Brigit P. C. Hurkens, Kim P. G. M. Janknegt, Rob Schols, Jos M. G. A. Mulder, Wubbo J. Verhey, Frans R. Winkens, Bjorn van der Kuy, Paul-Hugo M. BMC Geriatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the nursing home population, it is estimated that 1 in every 3 patients is polymedicated and given their considerable frailty, these patients are especially prone to adverse drug reactions. Clinical pharmacist-led medication reviews are considered successful interventions to improve medication safety in the inpatient setting. Due to the limited available evidence concerning the benefits of medication reviews performed in the nursing home setting, we propose a study aiming to demonstrate a positive effect that a clinical decision support system, as a health care intervention, may have on the target population. The primary objective of this study is to reduce the number of patients with at least one event when using the clinical decision support system compared to the regular care. These events consist of hospital referrals, delirium, falls, and/or deaths. METHOD/DESIGN: This study is a multicentre, prospective, randomised study with a cluster group design. The randomisation will be per main nursing home physician and stratified per ward (somatic and psychogeriatric). In the intervention group the clinical decision support system will be used to screen medication list, laboratory values and medical history in order to obtain potential clinical relevant remarks. The remarks will be sent to the main physician and feedback will be provided whether the advice was followed or not. In the control group regular care will be applied. DISCUSSION: We strongly believe that by using a clinical decision support system, medication reviews are performed in a standardised way which leads to comparable results between patients. In addition, using a clinical decision support system eliminates the time factor to perform medication reviews as the major problems related to medication, laboratory values, indications and/or established patient characteristics will be directly available. In this way, and in order to make the medication review process complete, consultation within healthcare professionals and/or the patient itself will be time effective and the medication surveillance could be performed around the clock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR5165. Registered 2nd April 2015. BioMed Central 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5270253/ /pubmed/28125977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0426-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mestres Gonzalvo, Carlota
de Wit, Hugo A. J. M.
van Oijen, Brigit P. C.
Hurkens, Kim P. G. M.
Janknegt, Rob
Schols, Jos M. G. A.
Mulder, Wubbo J.
Verhey, Frans R.
Winkens, Bjorn
van der Kuy, Paul-Hugo M.
Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study
title Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study
title_full Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study
title_fullStr Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study
title_short Supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (SCREAM): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study
title_sort supporting clinical rules engine in the adjustment of medication (scream): protocol of a multicentre, prospective, randomised study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0426-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mestresgonzalvocarlota supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT dewithugoajm supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT vanoijenbrigitpc supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT hurkenskimpgm supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT janknegtrob supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT scholsjosmga supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT mulderwubboj supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT verheyfransr supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT winkensbjorn supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT vanderkuypaulhugom supportingclinicalrulesengineintheadjustmentofmedicationscreamprotocolofamulticentreprospectiverandomisedstudy