Cargando…
A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management
BACKGROUND: Chronic hemodialysis patients frequently require anticoagulation treatment with warfarin for a variety of co-morbidities. The optimal method for monitoring and dose adjustment of warfarin-based anticoagulation in this population, however, remains unclear. To examine this more closely, we...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2381-7 |
_version_ | 1782501165754220544 |
---|---|
author | Lamontagne, S. Basein, Tinzar Chang, Binyue Mallela, Lakshmi |
author_facet | Lamontagne, S. Basein, Tinzar Chang, Binyue Mallela, Lakshmi |
author_sort | Lamontagne, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic hemodialysis patients frequently require anticoagulation treatment with warfarin for a variety of co-morbidities. The optimal method for monitoring and dose adjustment of warfarin-based anticoagulation in this population, however, remains unclear. To examine this more closely, we reviewed all hemodialysis patients at a single institution on chronic warfarin therapy for a 10-month period prior to and after the institution of a standardized protocol for warfarin dose adjustment and monitoring. Anticoagulation efficacy was assessed by time within the therapeutic INR range (TTR), and resource utilization was assessed by the number of weekly INR measurements required for monitoring. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 4481 patient-days of warfarin therapy data (from 25 hemodialysis patients) in the pre-protocol timeframe, and 3308 patient-days of warfarin therapy data (from 21 hemodialysis patients) in the on-protocol timeframe. Time within the therapeutic INR range (TTR) did not improve with institution of the dosing protocol—51.18% using non protocol-based management, and 51.57% using protocol-based management (p 0.73). However, overall resource utilization was reduced with institution of protocolized warfarin monitoring—from 1.71 INR measurements per patient-week pre-protocol, to 1.20 INR measurements per patient-week (p < 0.0001) post-protocol. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, institution of a standardized dosing protocol in a hemodialysis population on chronic warfarin therapy did not improve the rate of on-target anticoagulation, but did result in significantly lower resource utilization. We support protocol-based warfarin management in the hemodialysis population, but future work should examine the rate of on-target anticoagulation typically achieved in this group. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2381-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5270310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52703102017-02-01 A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management Lamontagne, S. Basein, Tinzar Chang, Binyue Mallela, Lakshmi BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic hemodialysis patients frequently require anticoagulation treatment with warfarin for a variety of co-morbidities. The optimal method for monitoring and dose adjustment of warfarin-based anticoagulation in this population, however, remains unclear. To examine this more closely, we reviewed all hemodialysis patients at a single institution on chronic warfarin therapy for a 10-month period prior to and after the institution of a standardized protocol for warfarin dose adjustment and monitoring. Anticoagulation efficacy was assessed by time within the therapeutic INR range (TTR), and resource utilization was assessed by the number of weekly INR measurements required for monitoring. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 4481 patient-days of warfarin therapy data (from 25 hemodialysis patients) in the pre-protocol timeframe, and 3308 patient-days of warfarin therapy data (from 21 hemodialysis patients) in the on-protocol timeframe. Time within the therapeutic INR range (TTR) did not improve with institution of the dosing protocol—51.18% using non protocol-based management, and 51.57% using protocol-based management (p 0.73). However, overall resource utilization was reduced with institution of protocolized warfarin monitoring—from 1.71 INR measurements per patient-week pre-protocol, to 1.20 INR measurements per patient-week (p < 0.0001) post-protocol. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, institution of a standardized dosing protocol in a hemodialysis population on chronic warfarin therapy did not improve the rate of on-target anticoagulation, but did result in significantly lower resource utilization. We support protocol-based warfarin management in the hemodialysis population, but future work should examine the rate of on-target anticoagulation typically achieved in this group. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2381-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5270310/ /pubmed/28126020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2381-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lamontagne, S. Basein, Tinzar Chang, Binyue Mallela, Lakshmi A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management |
title | A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management |
title_full | A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management |
title_fullStr | A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management |
title_full_unstemmed | A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management |
title_short | A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management |
title_sort | hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2381-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamontagnes ahemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement AT baseintinzar ahemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement AT changbinyue ahemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement AT mallelalakshmi ahemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement AT lamontagnes hemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement AT baseintinzar hemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement AT changbinyue hemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement AT mallelalakshmi hemodialysiscohortstudyofprotocolbasedanticoagulationmanagement |