Cargando…
Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, with current ex vivo organ storage times limited to 4 to 6 h before critical tissue damage occurs. Many preservation solutions exist in an attempt to limit both ischemic and reperfusion damage. In order to compa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x |
_version_ | 1782501177209913344 |
---|---|
author | Ferng, Alice S. Schipper, David Connell, Alana M. Marsh, Katherine M. Knapp, Shannon Khalpey, Zain |
author_facet | Ferng, Alice S. Schipper, David Connell, Alana M. Marsh, Katherine M. Knapp, Shannon Khalpey, Zain |
author_sort | Ferng, Alice S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, with current ex vivo organ storage times limited to 4 to 6 h before critical tissue damage occurs. Many preservation solutions exist in an attempt to limit both ischemic and reperfusion damage. In order to compare the effects of various storage solutions, mitochondrial function can be used to provide a sensitive analysis of cellular metabolic function. METHODS: Experimental plates were seeded with cardiac myoblasts and kept in suspended animation for either 4 or 8 h at either 4(o) or 21 °C, in Celsior®, Perfadex®, or Somah storage solutions. Cells were then reanimated for 1 h at 37 °C to simulate a reperfusion or clinical transplant scenario. Cellular bioenergetics were measured immediately thereafter to examine biochemical differences between preservation solutions and their effectiveness on preserving metabolic function. RESULTS: The oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution were significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, with the exception of Perfadex® at 4(o) for 4 h. This effect was sustained up to 8 h. At 21 °C, oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution are significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at basal conditions after 4 h, but this effect is not sustained after 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of this experiment was to study the efficacy of various preservation solutions on a mitochondrial level. The significantly higher oxygen consumption rates of Somah at 4 °C suggests that Somah solution may have the ability to protect cellular mitochondrial integrity, improve transplanted organ function by reducing ischemic-reperfusion injury, and thereby improve transplant outcomes. Given that Somah offers benefits over Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, it should be a target in future organ preservation solution research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5270367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52703672017-02-01 Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection Ferng, Alice S. Schipper, David Connell, Alana M. Marsh, Katherine M. Knapp, Shannon Khalpey, Zain J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, with current ex vivo organ storage times limited to 4 to 6 h before critical tissue damage occurs. Many preservation solutions exist in an attempt to limit both ischemic and reperfusion damage. In order to compare the effects of various storage solutions, mitochondrial function can be used to provide a sensitive analysis of cellular metabolic function. METHODS: Experimental plates were seeded with cardiac myoblasts and kept in suspended animation for either 4 or 8 h at either 4(o) or 21 °C, in Celsior®, Perfadex®, or Somah storage solutions. Cells were then reanimated for 1 h at 37 °C to simulate a reperfusion or clinical transplant scenario. Cellular bioenergetics were measured immediately thereafter to examine biochemical differences between preservation solutions and their effectiveness on preserving metabolic function. RESULTS: The oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution were significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, with the exception of Perfadex® at 4(o) for 4 h. This effect was sustained up to 8 h. At 21 °C, oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution are significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at basal conditions after 4 h, but this effect is not sustained after 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of this experiment was to study the efficacy of various preservation solutions on a mitochondrial level. The significantly higher oxygen consumption rates of Somah at 4 °C suggests that Somah solution may have the ability to protect cellular mitochondrial integrity, improve transplanted organ function by reducing ischemic-reperfusion injury, and thereby improve transplant outcomes. Given that Somah offers benefits over Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, it should be a target in future organ preservation solution research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5270367/ /pubmed/28126002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferng, Alice S. Schipper, David Connell, Alana M. Marsh, Katherine M. Knapp, Shannon Khalpey, Zain Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection |
title | Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection |
title_full | Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection |
title_fullStr | Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection |
title_short | Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection |
title_sort | novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferngalices novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection AT schipperdavid novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection AT connellalanam novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection AT marshkatherinem novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection AT knappshannon novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection AT khalpeyzain novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection |