Cargando…

Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, with current ex vivo organ storage times limited to 4 to 6 h before critical tissue damage occurs. Many preservation solutions exist in an attempt to limit both ischemic and reperfusion damage. In order to compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferng, Alice S., Schipper, David, Connell, Alana M., Marsh, Katherine M., Knapp, Shannon, Khalpey, Zain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x
_version_ 1782501177209913344
author Ferng, Alice S.
Schipper, David
Connell, Alana M.
Marsh, Katherine M.
Knapp, Shannon
Khalpey, Zain
author_facet Ferng, Alice S.
Schipper, David
Connell, Alana M.
Marsh, Katherine M.
Knapp, Shannon
Khalpey, Zain
author_sort Ferng, Alice S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, with current ex vivo organ storage times limited to 4 to 6 h before critical tissue damage occurs. Many preservation solutions exist in an attempt to limit both ischemic and reperfusion damage. In order to compare the effects of various storage solutions, mitochondrial function can be used to provide a sensitive analysis of cellular metabolic function. METHODS: Experimental plates were seeded with cardiac myoblasts and kept in suspended animation for either 4 or 8 h at either 4(o) or 21 °C, in Celsior®, Perfadex®, or Somah storage solutions. Cells were then reanimated for 1 h at 37 °C to simulate a reperfusion or clinical transplant scenario. Cellular bioenergetics were measured immediately thereafter to examine biochemical differences between preservation solutions and their effectiveness on preserving metabolic function. RESULTS: The oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution were significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, with the exception of Perfadex® at 4(o) for 4 h. This effect was sustained up to 8 h. At 21 °C, oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution are significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at basal conditions after 4 h, but this effect is not sustained after 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of this experiment was to study the efficacy of various preservation solutions on a mitochondrial level. The significantly higher oxygen consumption rates of Somah at 4 °C suggests that Somah solution may have the ability to protect cellular mitochondrial integrity, improve transplanted organ function by reducing ischemic-reperfusion injury, and thereby improve transplant outcomes. Given that Somah offers benefits over Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, it should be a target in future organ preservation solution research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5270367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52703672017-02-01 Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection Ferng, Alice S. Schipper, David Connell, Alana M. Marsh, Katherine M. Knapp, Shannon Khalpey, Zain J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for end-stage heart failure, with current ex vivo organ storage times limited to 4 to 6 h before critical tissue damage occurs. Many preservation solutions exist in an attempt to limit both ischemic and reperfusion damage. In order to compare the effects of various storage solutions, mitochondrial function can be used to provide a sensitive analysis of cellular metabolic function. METHODS: Experimental plates were seeded with cardiac myoblasts and kept in suspended animation for either 4 or 8 h at either 4(o) or 21 °C, in Celsior®, Perfadex®, or Somah storage solutions. Cells were then reanimated for 1 h at 37 °C to simulate a reperfusion or clinical transplant scenario. Cellular bioenergetics were measured immediately thereafter to examine biochemical differences between preservation solutions and their effectiveness on preserving metabolic function. RESULTS: The oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution were significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, with the exception of Perfadex® at 4(o) for 4 h. This effect was sustained up to 8 h. At 21 °C, oxygen consumption rates of Somah solution are significantly higher than Celsior® and Perfadex® at basal conditions after 4 h, but this effect is not sustained after 8 h. CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of this experiment was to study the efficacy of various preservation solutions on a mitochondrial level. The significantly higher oxygen consumption rates of Somah at 4 °C suggests that Somah solution may have the ability to protect cellular mitochondrial integrity, improve transplanted organ function by reducing ischemic-reperfusion injury, and thereby improve transplant outcomes. Given that Somah offers benefits over Celsior® and Perfadex® at 4 °C, it should be a target in future organ preservation solution research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5270367/ /pubmed/28126002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferng, Alice S.
Schipper, David
Connell, Alana M.
Marsh, Katherine M.
Knapp, Shannon
Khalpey, Zain
Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
title Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
title_full Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
title_fullStr Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
title_full_unstemmed Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
title_short Novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
title_sort novel vs clinical organ preservation solutions: improved cardiac mitochondrial protection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28126002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0564-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ferngalices novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection
AT schipperdavid novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection
AT connellalanam novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection
AT marshkatherinem novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection
AT knappshannon novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection
AT khalpeyzain novelvsclinicalorganpreservationsolutionsimprovedcardiacmitochondrialprotection