Cargando…

Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network

The Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) project was initiated in 2006 as a community-wide effort for the development of network inference challenges for rigorous assessment of reverse engineering methods for biological networks. We participated in the in silico network i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Peng, Gong, Ping, Li, Haoni, Perkins, Edward J, Wang, Nan, Zhang, Chaoyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3
_version_ 1782501193131491328
author Li, Peng
Gong, Ping
Li, Haoni
Perkins, Edward J
Wang, Nan
Zhang, Chaoyang
author_facet Li, Peng
Gong, Ping
Li, Haoni
Perkins, Edward J
Wang, Nan
Zhang, Chaoyang
author_sort Li, Peng
collection PubMed
description The Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) project was initiated in 2006 as a community-wide effort for the development of network inference challenges for rigorous assessment of reverse engineering methods for biological networks. We participated in the in silico network inference challenge of DREAM3 in 2008. Here we report the details of our approach and its performance on the synthetic challenge datasets. In our methodology, we first developed a model called relative change ratio (RCR), which took advantage of the heterozygous knockdown data and null-mutant knockout data provided by the challenge, in order to identify the potential regulators for the genes. With this information, a time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network (TDBN) approach was then used to infer gene regulatory networks from time series trajectory datasets. Our approach considerably reduced the searching space of TDBN; hence, it gained a much higher efficiency and accuracy. The networks predicted using our approach were evaluated comparatively along with 29 other submissions by two metrics (area under the ROC curve and area under the precision-recall curve). The overall performance of our approach ranked the second among all participating teams. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5270498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52704982017-02-13 Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network Li, Peng Gong, Ping Li, Haoni Perkins, Edward J Wang, Nan Zhang, Chaoyang EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol Research The Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) project was initiated in 2006 as a community-wide effort for the development of network inference challenges for rigorous assessment of reverse engineering methods for biological networks. We participated in the in silico network inference challenge of DREAM3 in 2008. Here we report the details of our approach and its performance on the synthetic challenge datasets. In our methodology, we first developed a model called relative change ratio (RCR), which took advantage of the heterozygous knockdown data and null-mutant knockout data provided by the challenge, in order to identify the potential regulators for the genes. With this information, a time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network (TDBN) approach was then used to infer gene regulatory networks from time series trajectory datasets. Our approach considerably reduced the searching space of TDBN; hence, it gained a much higher efficiency and accuracy. The networks predicted using our approach were evaluated comparatively along with 29 other submissions by two metrics (area under the ROC curve and area under the precision-recall curve). The overall performance of our approach ranked the second among all participating teams. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5270498/ /pubmed/28194162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3 Text en © Li et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
spellingShingle Research
Li, Peng
Gong, Ping
Li, Haoni
Perkins, Edward J
Wang, Nan
Zhang, Chaoyang
Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network
title Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network
title_full Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network
title_fullStr Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network
title_full_unstemmed Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network
title_short Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network
title_sort gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic bayesian network
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lipeng generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork
AT gongping generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork
AT lihaoni generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork
AT perkinsedwardj generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork
AT wangnan generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork
AT zhangchaoyang generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork