Cargando…
Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network
The Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) project was initiated in 2006 as a community-wide effort for the development of network inference challenges for rigorous assessment of reverse engineering methods for biological networks. We participated in the in silico network i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3 |
_version_ | 1782501193131491328 |
---|---|
author | Li, Peng Gong, Ping Li, Haoni Perkins, Edward J Wang, Nan Zhang, Chaoyang |
author_facet | Li, Peng Gong, Ping Li, Haoni Perkins, Edward J Wang, Nan Zhang, Chaoyang |
author_sort | Li, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) project was initiated in 2006 as a community-wide effort for the development of network inference challenges for rigorous assessment of reverse engineering methods for biological networks. We participated in the in silico network inference challenge of DREAM3 in 2008. Here we report the details of our approach and its performance on the synthetic challenge datasets. In our methodology, we first developed a model called relative change ratio (RCR), which took advantage of the heterozygous knockdown data and null-mutant knockout data provided by the challenge, in order to identify the potential regulators for the genes. With this information, a time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network (TDBN) approach was then used to infer gene regulatory networks from time series trajectory datasets. Our approach considerably reduced the searching space of TDBN; hence, it gained a much higher efficiency and accuracy. The networks predicted using our approach were evaluated comparatively along with 29 other submissions by two metrics (area under the ROC curve and area under the precision-recall curve). The overall performance of our approach ranked the second among all participating teams. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5270498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52704982017-02-13 Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network Li, Peng Gong, Ping Li, Haoni Perkins, Edward J Wang, Nan Zhang, Chaoyang EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol Research The Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) project was initiated in 2006 as a community-wide effort for the development of network inference challenges for rigorous assessment of reverse engineering methods for biological networks. We participated in the in silico network inference challenge of DREAM3 in 2008. Here we report the details of our approach and its performance on the synthetic challenge datasets. In our methodology, we first developed a model called relative change ratio (RCR), which took advantage of the heterozygous knockdown data and null-mutant knockout data provided by the challenge, in order to identify the potential regulators for the genes. With this information, a time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network (TDBN) approach was then used to infer gene regulatory networks from time series trajectory datasets. Our approach considerably reduced the searching space of TDBN; hence, it gained a much higher efficiency and accuracy. The networks predicted using our approach were evaluated comparatively along with 29 other submissions by two metrics (area under the ROC curve and area under the precision-recall curve). The overall performance of our approach ranked the second among all participating teams. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5270498/ /pubmed/28194162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3 Text en © Li et al.; licensee Springer. 2014 |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Peng Gong, Ping Li, Haoni Perkins, Edward J Wang, Nan Zhang, Chaoyang Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network |
title | Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network |
title_full | Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network |
title_fullStr | Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network |
title_short | Gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic Bayesian network |
title_sort | gene regulatory network inference and validation using relative change ratio analysis and time-delayed dynamic bayesian network |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5270498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28194162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13637-014-0012-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipeng generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork AT gongping generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork AT lihaoni generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork AT perkinsedwardj generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork AT wangnan generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork AT zhangchaoyang generegulatorynetworkinferenceandvalidationusingrelativechangeratioanalysisandtimedelayeddynamicbayesiannetwork |