Cargando…

Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012)

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic chlamydia screening of <25 year-olds was nationally-implemented in England in 2008 but its impact on chlamydia transmission is poorly understood. We undertook a population-based seroprevalence study to explore the impact of screening on cumulative incidence of chlamydia,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodhall, Sarah C., Wills, Gillian S., Horner, Patrick J., Craig, Rachel, Mindell, Jennifer S., Murphy, Gary, McClure, Myra O., Soldan, Kate, Nardone, Anthony, Johnson, Anne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5271337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152810
_version_ 1782501331964002304
author Woodhall, Sarah C.
Wills, Gillian S.
Horner, Patrick J.
Craig, Rachel
Mindell, Jennifer S.
Murphy, Gary
McClure, Myra O.
Soldan, Kate
Nardone, Anthony
Johnson, Anne M.
author_facet Woodhall, Sarah C.
Wills, Gillian S.
Horner, Patrick J.
Craig, Rachel
Mindell, Jennifer S.
Murphy, Gary
McClure, Myra O.
Soldan, Kate
Nardone, Anthony
Johnson, Anne M.
author_sort Woodhall, Sarah C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Opportunistic chlamydia screening of <25 year-olds was nationally-implemented in England in 2008 but its impact on chlamydia transmission is poorly understood. We undertook a population-based seroprevalence study to explore the impact of screening on cumulative incidence of chlamydia, as measured by C.trachomatis-specific antibody. METHODS: Anonymised sera from participants in the nationally-representative Health Surveys for England (HSE) were tested for C.trachomatis antibodies using two novel Pgp3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) as a marker of past infection. Determinants of being seropositive were explored using logistic regression among 16–44 year-old women and men in 2010 and 2012 (years when sexual behaviour questions were included in the survey) (n = 1,402 women; 1,119 men). Seroprevalence trends among 16–24 year-old women (n = 3,361) were investigated over ten time points from 1994–2012. RESULTS: In HSE2010/2012, Pgp3 seroprevalence among 16–44 year-olds was 24.4% (95%CI 22.0–27.1) in women and 13.9% (11.8–16.2) in men. Seroprevalence increased with age (up to 33.5% [27.5–40.2] in 30–34 year-old women, 18.7% [13.4–25.6] in 35–39 year-old men); years since first sex; number of lifetime sexual partners; and younger age at first sex. 76.7% of seropositive 16–24 year-olds had never been diagnosed with chlamydia. Among 16–24 year-old women, a non-significant decline in seroprevalence was observed from 2008–2012 (prevalence ratio per year: 0.94 [0.84–1.05]). CONCLUSION: Our application of Pgp3 ELISAs demonstrates a high lifetime risk of chlamydia infection among women and a large proportion of undiagnosed infections. A decrease in age-specific cumulative incidence following national implementation of opportunistic chlamydia screening has not yet been demonstrated. We propose these assays be used to assess impact of chlamydia control programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5271337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52713372017-02-06 Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012) Woodhall, Sarah C. Wills, Gillian S. Horner, Patrick J. Craig, Rachel Mindell, Jennifer S. Murphy, Gary McClure, Myra O. Soldan, Kate Nardone, Anthony Johnson, Anne M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Opportunistic chlamydia screening of <25 year-olds was nationally-implemented in England in 2008 but its impact on chlamydia transmission is poorly understood. We undertook a population-based seroprevalence study to explore the impact of screening on cumulative incidence of chlamydia, as measured by C.trachomatis-specific antibody. METHODS: Anonymised sera from participants in the nationally-representative Health Surveys for England (HSE) were tested for C.trachomatis antibodies using two novel Pgp3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) as a marker of past infection. Determinants of being seropositive were explored using logistic regression among 16–44 year-old women and men in 2010 and 2012 (years when sexual behaviour questions were included in the survey) (n = 1,402 women; 1,119 men). Seroprevalence trends among 16–24 year-old women (n = 3,361) were investigated over ten time points from 1994–2012. RESULTS: In HSE2010/2012, Pgp3 seroprevalence among 16–44 year-olds was 24.4% (95%CI 22.0–27.1) in women and 13.9% (11.8–16.2) in men. Seroprevalence increased with age (up to 33.5% [27.5–40.2] in 30–34 year-old women, 18.7% [13.4–25.6] in 35–39 year-old men); years since first sex; number of lifetime sexual partners; and younger age at first sex. 76.7% of seropositive 16–24 year-olds had never been diagnosed with chlamydia. Among 16–24 year-old women, a non-significant decline in seroprevalence was observed from 2008–2012 (prevalence ratio per year: 0.94 [0.84–1.05]). CONCLUSION: Our application of Pgp3 ELISAs demonstrates a high lifetime risk of chlamydia infection among women and a large proportion of undiagnosed infections. A decrease in age-specific cumulative incidence following national implementation of opportunistic chlamydia screening has not yet been demonstrated. We propose these assays be used to assess impact of chlamydia control programmes. Public Library of Science 2017-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5271337/ /pubmed/28129328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152810 Text en © 2017 Woodhall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Woodhall, Sarah C.
Wills, Gillian S.
Horner, Patrick J.
Craig, Rachel
Mindell, Jennifer S.
Murphy, Gary
McClure, Myra O.
Soldan, Kate
Nardone, Anthony
Johnson, Anne M.
Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012)
title Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012)
title_full Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012)
title_fullStr Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012)
title_full_unstemmed Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012)
title_short Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 Antibody Population Seroprevalence before and during an Era of Widespread Opportunistic Chlamydia Screening in England (1994-2012)
title_sort chlamydia trachomatis pgp3 antibody population seroprevalence before and during an era of widespread opportunistic chlamydia screening in england (1994-2012)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5271337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152810
work_keys_str_mv AT woodhallsarahc chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT willsgillians chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT hornerpatrickj chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT craigrachel chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT mindelljennifers chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT murphygary chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT mccluremyrao chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT soldankate chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT nardoneanthony chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012
AT johnsonannem chlamydiatrachomatispgp3antibodypopulationseroprevalencebeforeandduringaneraofwidespreadopportunisticchlamydiascreeninginengland19942012