Cargando…

Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates

Mismatch negativity (MMN) has been characterised as a ‘pre-attentive’ component of an event-related potential (ERP) that is related to discrimination and error prediction processes. The aim of the current experiment was to establish whether visual MMN could be recorded to briefly presented, backward...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flynn, Maria, Liasis, Alki, Gardner, Mark, Towell, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5272894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4807-1
_version_ 1782501607230930944
author Flynn, Maria
Liasis, Alki
Gardner, Mark
Towell, Tony
author_facet Flynn, Maria
Liasis, Alki
Gardner, Mark
Towell, Tony
author_sort Flynn, Maria
collection PubMed
description Mismatch negativity (MMN) has been characterised as a ‘pre-attentive’ component of an event-related potential (ERP) that is related to discrimination and error prediction processes. The aim of the current experiment was to establish whether visual MMN could be recorded to briefly presented, backward and forward masked visual stimuli, given both below and above levels of subjective experience. Evidence of visual MMN elicitation in the absence of the ability to consciously report stimuli would provide strong evidence for the automaticity of the visual MMN mechanism. Using an oddball paradigm, two stimuli that differed in orientation from each other, a + and an ×, were presented on a computer screen. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from nine participants (six females), mean age 21.4 years. Results showed that for stimuli that were effectively masked at 7 ms presentation, there was little variation in the ERPs evoked to standard and deviant stimuli or in the subtraction waveform employed to delineate the visual MMN. At 14 ms stimulus presentation, when participants were able to report stimulus presence, an enhanced negativity at around 175 and 305 ms was observed to the deviant and was evident in the subtraction waveform. However, some of the difference observed in the ERPs can be attributed to stimulus characteristics, as the use of a ‘lonely’ deviant protocol revealed attenuated visual MMN components at 14 ms stimulus presentation. Overall, results suggest that some degree of conscious attention is required before visual MMN components emerge, suggesting visual MMN is not an entirely pre-attentive process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5272894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52728942017-02-10 Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates Flynn, Maria Liasis, Alki Gardner, Mark Towell, Tony Exp Brain Res Research Article Mismatch negativity (MMN) has been characterised as a ‘pre-attentive’ component of an event-related potential (ERP) that is related to discrimination and error prediction processes. The aim of the current experiment was to establish whether visual MMN could be recorded to briefly presented, backward and forward masked visual stimuli, given both below and above levels of subjective experience. Evidence of visual MMN elicitation in the absence of the ability to consciously report stimuli would provide strong evidence for the automaticity of the visual MMN mechanism. Using an oddball paradigm, two stimuli that differed in orientation from each other, a + and an ×, were presented on a computer screen. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded from nine participants (six females), mean age 21.4 years. Results showed that for stimuli that were effectively masked at 7 ms presentation, there was little variation in the ERPs evoked to standard and deviant stimuli or in the subtraction waveform employed to delineate the visual MMN. At 14 ms stimulus presentation, when participants were able to report stimulus presence, an enhanced negativity at around 175 and 305 ms was observed to the deviant and was evident in the subtraction waveform. However, some of the difference observed in the ERPs can be attributed to stimulus characteristics, as the use of a ‘lonely’ deviant protocol revealed attenuated visual MMN components at 14 ms stimulus presentation. Overall, results suggest that some degree of conscious attention is required before visual MMN components emerge, suggesting visual MMN is not an entirely pre-attentive process. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-03 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5272894/ /pubmed/27812749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4807-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flynn, Maria
Liasis, Alki
Gardner, Mark
Towell, Tony
Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates
title Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates
title_full Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates
title_fullStr Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates
title_full_unstemmed Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates
title_short Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates
title_sort visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5272894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27812749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4807-1
work_keys_str_mv AT flynnmaria visualmismatchnegativitytomaskedstimulipresentedatverybriefpresentationrates
AT liasisalki visualmismatchnegativitytomaskedstimulipresentedatverybriefpresentationrates
AT gardnermark visualmismatchnegativitytomaskedstimulipresentedatverybriefpresentationrates
AT towelltony visualmismatchnegativitytomaskedstimulipresentedatverybriefpresentationrates