Cargando…

Measuring value sensitivity in medicine

BACKGROUND: Value sensitivity – the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice – is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ineichen, Christian, Christen, Markus, Tanner, Carmen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5273831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7
_version_ 1782501791177375744
author Ineichen, Christian
Christen, Markus
Tanner, Carmen
author_facet Ineichen, Christian
Christen, Markus
Tanner, Carmen
author_sort Ineichen, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Value sensitivity – the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice – is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom an explicit subject in the training of medical professionals. In this contribution, we outline the traditional concept of moral sensitivity in medicine and its revised form conceptualized as value sensitivity and we propose an instrument that measures value sensitivity. METHODS: We developed an instrument for assessing the sensitivity for three value groups (moral-related values, values related to the principles of biomedical ethics, strategy-related values) in a four step procedure: 1) value identification (n = 317); 2) value representation (n = 317); 3) vignette construction and quality evaluation (n = 37); and 4) instrument validation by comparing nursing professionals with hospital managers (n = 48). RESULTS: We find that nursing professionals recognize and ascribe importance to principle-related issues more than professionals from hospital management. The latter are more likely to recognize and ascribe importance to strategy-related issues. CONCLUSIONS: These hypothesis-driven results demonstrate the discriminatory power of our newly developed instrument, which makes it useful not only for health care professionals in practice but for students and people working in the clinical context as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5273831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52738312017-02-01 Measuring value sensitivity in medicine Ineichen, Christian Christen, Markus Tanner, Carmen BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Value sensitivity – the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice – is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom an explicit subject in the training of medical professionals. In this contribution, we outline the traditional concept of moral sensitivity in medicine and its revised form conceptualized as value sensitivity and we propose an instrument that measures value sensitivity. METHODS: We developed an instrument for assessing the sensitivity for three value groups (moral-related values, values related to the principles of biomedical ethics, strategy-related values) in a four step procedure: 1) value identification (n = 317); 2) value representation (n = 317); 3) vignette construction and quality evaluation (n = 37); and 4) instrument validation by comparing nursing professionals with hospital managers (n = 48). RESULTS: We find that nursing professionals recognize and ascribe importance to principle-related issues more than professionals from hospital management. The latter are more likely to recognize and ascribe importance to strategy-related issues. CONCLUSIONS: These hypothesis-driven results demonstrate the discriminatory power of our newly developed instrument, which makes it useful not only for health care professionals in practice but for students and people working in the clinical context as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5273831/ /pubmed/28129753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ineichen, Christian
Christen, Markus
Tanner, Carmen
Measuring value sensitivity in medicine
title Measuring value sensitivity in medicine
title_full Measuring value sensitivity in medicine
title_fullStr Measuring value sensitivity in medicine
title_full_unstemmed Measuring value sensitivity in medicine
title_short Measuring value sensitivity in medicine
title_sort measuring value sensitivity in medicine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5273831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ineichenchristian measuringvaluesensitivityinmedicine
AT christenmarkus measuringvaluesensitivityinmedicine
AT tannercarmen measuringvaluesensitivityinmedicine