Cargando…
Measuring value sensitivity in medicine
BACKGROUND: Value sensitivity – the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice – is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5273831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7 |
_version_ | 1782501791177375744 |
---|---|
author | Ineichen, Christian Christen, Markus Tanner, Carmen |
author_facet | Ineichen, Christian Christen, Markus Tanner, Carmen |
author_sort | Ineichen, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Value sensitivity – the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice – is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom an explicit subject in the training of medical professionals. In this contribution, we outline the traditional concept of moral sensitivity in medicine and its revised form conceptualized as value sensitivity and we propose an instrument that measures value sensitivity. METHODS: We developed an instrument for assessing the sensitivity for three value groups (moral-related values, values related to the principles of biomedical ethics, strategy-related values) in a four step procedure: 1) value identification (n = 317); 2) value representation (n = 317); 3) vignette construction and quality evaluation (n = 37); and 4) instrument validation by comparing nursing professionals with hospital managers (n = 48). RESULTS: We find that nursing professionals recognize and ascribe importance to principle-related issues more than professionals from hospital management. The latter are more likely to recognize and ascribe importance to strategy-related issues. CONCLUSIONS: These hypothesis-driven results demonstrate the discriminatory power of our newly developed instrument, which makes it useful not only for health care professionals in practice but for students and people working in the clinical context as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5273831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52738312017-02-01 Measuring value sensitivity in medicine Ineichen, Christian Christen, Markus Tanner, Carmen BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Value sensitivity – the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice – is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom an explicit subject in the training of medical professionals. In this contribution, we outline the traditional concept of moral sensitivity in medicine and its revised form conceptualized as value sensitivity and we propose an instrument that measures value sensitivity. METHODS: We developed an instrument for assessing the sensitivity for three value groups (moral-related values, values related to the principles of biomedical ethics, strategy-related values) in a four step procedure: 1) value identification (n = 317); 2) value representation (n = 317); 3) vignette construction and quality evaluation (n = 37); and 4) instrument validation by comparing nursing professionals with hospital managers (n = 48). RESULTS: We find that nursing professionals recognize and ascribe importance to principle-related issues more than professionals from hospital management. The latter are more likely to recognize and ascribe importance to strategy-related issues. CONCLUSIONS: These hypothesis-driven results demonstrate the discriminatory power of our newly developed instrument, which makes it useful not only for health care professionals in practice but for students and people working in the clinical context as well. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5273831/ /pubmed/28129753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ineichen, Christian Christen, Markus Tanner, Carmen Measuring value sensitivity in medicine |
title | Measuring value sensitivity in medicine |
title_full | Measuring value sensitivity in medicine |
title_fullStr | Measuring value sensitivity in medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring value sensitivity in medicine |
title_short | Measuring value sensitivity in medicine |
title_sort | measuring value sensitivity in medicine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5273831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ineichenchristian measuringvaluesensitivityinmedicine AT christenmarkus measuringvaluesensitivityinmedicine AT tannercarmen measuringvaluesensitivityinmedicine |