Cargando…
Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Good health and equal health care are the cornerstones of the Swedish Health and Medical Service Act. Recent studies show that the average level of health, measured as longevity, improves in Sweden, however, social inequalities in health remain a major issue. An important issue is how he...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5273847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0524-z |
_version_ | 1782501794611462144 |
---|---|
author | Burström, Bo Burström, Kristina Nilsson, Gunnar Tomson, Göran Whitehead, Margaret Winblad, Ulrika |
author_facet | Burström, Bo Burström, Kristina Nilsson, Gunnar Tomson, Göran Whitehead, Margaret Winblad, Ulrika |
author_sort | Burström, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Good health and equal health care are the cornerstones of the Swedish Health and Medical Service Act. Recent studies show that the average level of health, measured as longevity, improves in Sweden, however, social inequalities in health remain a major issue. An important issue is how health care services can contribute to reducing inequalities in health, and the impact of a recent Primary Health Care (PHC) Choice Reform in this respect. This paper presents the findings of a review of the existing evidence on impacts of these reforms. METHODS: We reviewed the published accounts (reports and scientific articles) which reported on the impact of the Swedish PHC Choice Reform of 2010 and changes in reimbursement systems, using Donabedian’s framework for assessing quality of care in terms of structure, process and outcomes. RESULTS: Since 2010, over 270 new private PHC practices operating for profit have been established throughout the country. One study found that the new establishments had primarily located in the largest cities and urban areas, in socioeconomically more advantaged populations. Another study, adjusting for socioeconomic composition found minor differences. The number of visits to PHC doctors has increased, more so among those with lesser needs of health care. The reform has had a negative impact on the provision of services for persons with complex needs. Opinions of doctors and staff in PHC are mixed, many state that persons with lesser needs are prioritized. Patient satisfaction is largely unchanged. The impact of PHC on population health may be reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The PHC Choice Reform increased the average number of visits, but particularly among those in more affluent groups and with lower health care needs, and has made integrated care for those with complex needs more difficult. Resource allocation to PHC has become more dependent on provider location, patient choice and demand, and less on need of care. On the available evidence, the PHC Choice Reform may have damaged equity of primary health care provision, contrary to the tenets of the Swedish Health and Medical Service Act. This situation needs to be carefully monitored. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5273847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52738472017-02-01 Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review Burström, Bo Burström, Kristina Nilsson, Gunnar Tomson, Göran Whitehead, Margaret Winblad, Ulrika Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Good health and equal health care are the cornerstones of the Swedish Health and Medical Service Act. Recent studies show that the average level of health, measured as longevity, improves in Sweden, however, social inequalities in health remain a major issue. An important issue is how health care services can contribute to reducing inequalities in health, and the impact of a recent Primary Health Care (PHC) Choice Reform in this respect. This paper presents the findings of a review of the existing evidence on impacts of these reforms. METHODS: We reviewed the published accounts (reports and scientific articles) which reported on the impact of the Swedish PHC Choice Reform of 2010 and changes in reimbursement systems, using Donabedian’s framework for assessing quality of care in terms of structure, process and outcomes. RESULTS: Since 2010, over 270 new private PHC practices operating for profit have been established throughout the country. One study found that the new establishments had primarily located in the largest cities and urban areas, in socioeconomically more advantaged populations. Another study, adjusting for socioeconomic composition found minor differences. The number of visits to PHC doctors has increased, more so among those with lesser needs of health care. The reform has had a negative impact on the provision of services for persons with complex needs. Opinions of doctors and staff in PHC are mixed, many state that persons with lesser needs are prioritized. Patient satisfaction is largely unchanged. The impact of PHC on population health may be reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The PHC Choice Reform increased the average number of visits, but particularly among those in more affluent groups and with lower health care needs, and has made integrated care for those with complex needs more difficult. Resource allocation to PHC has become more dependent on provider location, patient choice and demand, and less on need of care. On the available evidence, the PHC Choice Reform may have damaged equity of primary health care provision, contrary to the tenets of the Swedish Health and Medical Service Act. This situation needs to be carefully monitored. BioMed Central 2017-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5273847/ /pubmed/28129771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0524-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Burström, Bo Burström, Kristina Nilsson, Gunnar Tomson, Göran Whitehead, Margaret Winblad, Ulrika Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review |
title | Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review |
title_full | Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review |
title_short | Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden – a scoping review |
title_sort | equity aspects of the primary health care choice reform in sweden – a scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5273847/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28129771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0524-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burstrombo equityaspectsoftheprimaryhealthcarechoicereforminswedenascopingreview AT burstromkristina equityaspectsoftheprimaryhealthcarechoicereforminswedenascopingreview AT nilssongunnar equityaspectsoftheprimaryhealthcarechoicereforminswedenascopingreview AT tomsongoran equityaspectsoftheprimaryhealthcarechoicereforminswedenascopingreview AT whiteheadmargaret equityaspectsoftheprimaryhealthcarechoicereforminswedenascopingreview AT winbladulrika equityaspectsoftheprimaryhealthcarechoicereforminswedenascopingreview |