Cargando…

What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?

[Purpose] To examine the distribution of and relationship between the Gross Motor Function, Manual Ability, and Communication Function Classification Systems in different limbs of children with spastic cerebral palsy. We also investigated whether the four predicting variables of gender, age, manual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mutlu, Akmer, Pistav-Akmese, Pelin, Yardımcı, Bilge Nur, Ogretmen, Tuncay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5276790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3493
_version_ 1782502342173655040
author Mutlu, Akmer
Pistav-Akmese, Pelin
Yardımcı, Bilge Nur
Ogretmen, Tuncay
author_facet Mutlu, Akmer
Pistav-Akmese, Pelin
Yardımcı, Bilge Nur
Ogretmen, Tuncay
author_sort Mutlu, Akmer
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] To examine the distribution of and relationship between the Gross Motor Function, Manual Ability, and Communication Function Classification Systems in different limbs of children with spastic cerebral palsy. We also investigated whether the four predicting variables of gender, age, manual ability, and gross motor classifications could significantly predict effective and non-effective communicator groups in communication function. [Subjects and Methods] This retrospective cross-sectional study included 327 children with a mean age of 10.13 ± 4.09 years. Classifications were performed by an experienced pediatric physiotherapist. [Results] Gross motor function levels showed a strong correlation with manual ability levels (r(s)=0.78). Manual ability level was strongly correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.73), particularly in quadriplegic children (r(s)=0.78). Gross motor function levels were moderately correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.71). Effective communicators in communication function showed more functional levels of manual ability and were determined by Gross Motor Function classifications. The variables were better at predicting ineffective communicators (91% correct) compared with effective communicators (85% correct). [Conclusion] Further studies are needed to relate these functional performance systems to the activity and participation levels as well as the quality of life, desires, and participation of the subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5276790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52767902017-02-07 What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us? Mutlu, Akmer Pistav-Akmese, Pelin Yardımcı, Bilge Nur Ogretmen, Tuncay J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To examine the distribution of and relationship between the Gross Motor Function, Manual Ability, and Communication Function Classification Systems in different limbs of children with spastic cerebral palsy. We also investigated whether the four predicting variables of gender, age, manual ability, and gross motor classifications could significantly predict effective and non-effective communicator groups in communication function. [Subjects and Methods] This retrospective cross-sectional study included 327 children with a mean age of 10.13 ± 4.09 years. Classifications were performed by an experienced pediatric physiotherapist. [Results] Gross motor function levels showed a strong correlation with manual ability levels (r(s)=0.78). Manual ability level was strongly correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.73), particularly in quadriplegic children (r(s)=0.78). Gross motor function levels were moderately correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.71). Effective communicators in communication function showed more functional levels of manual ability and were determined by Gross Motor Function classifications. The variables were better at predicting ineffective communicators (91% correct) compared with effective communicators (85% correct). [Conclusion] Further studies are needed to relate these functional performance systems to the activity and participation levels as well as the quality of life, desires, and participation of the subjects. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016-12-27 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5276790/ /pubmed/28174481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3493 Text en 2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mutlu, Akmer
Pistav-Akmese, Pelin
Yardımcı, Bilge Nur
Ogretmen, Tuncay
What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
title What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
title_full What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
title_fullStr What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
title_full_unstemmed What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
title_short What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
title_sort what do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5276790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3493
work_keys_str_mv AT mutluakmer whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus
AT pistavakmesepelin whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus
AT yardımcıbilgenur whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus
AT ogretmentuncay whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus