Cargando…
What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us?
[Purpose] To examine the distribution of and relationship between the Gross Motor Function, Manual Ability, and Communication Function Classification Systems in different limbs of children with spastic cerebral palsy. We also investigated whether the four predicting variables of gender, age, manual...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5276790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3493 |
_version_ | 1782502342173655040 |
---|---|
author | Mutlu, Akmer Pistav-Akmese, Pelin Yardımcı, Bilge Nur Ogretmen, Tuncay |
author_facet | Mutlu, Akmer Pistav-Akmese, Pelin Yardımcı, Bilge Nur Ogretmen, Tuncay |
author_sort | Mutlu, Akmer |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] To examine the distribution of and relationship between the Gross Motor Function, Manual Ability, and Communication Function Classification Systems in different limbs of children with spastic cerebral palsy. We also investigated whether the four predicting variables of gender, age, manual ability, and gross motor classifications could significantly predict effective and non-effective communicator groups in communication function. [Subjects and Methods] This retrospective cross-sectional study included 327 children with a mean age of 10.13 ± 4.09 years. Classifications were performed by an experienced pediatric physiotherapist. [Results] Gross motor function levels showed a strong correlation with manual ability levels (r(s)=0.78). Manual ability level was strongly correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.73), particularly in quadriplegic children (r(s)=0.78). Gross motor function levels were moderately correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.71). Effective communicators in communication function showed more functional levels of manual ability and were determined by Gross Motor Function classifications. The variables were better at predicting ineffective communicators (91% correct) compared with effective communicators (85% correct). [Conclusion] Further studies are needed to relate these functional performance systems to the activity and participation levels as well as the quality of life, desires, and participation of the subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5276790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52767902017-02-07 What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us? Mutlu, Akmer Pistav-Akmese, Pelin Yardımcı, Bilge Nur Ogretmen, Tuncay J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To examine the distribution of and relationship between the Gross Motor Function, Manual Ability, and Communication Function Classification Systems in different limbs of children with spastic cerebral palsy. We also investigated whether the four predicting variables of gender, age, manual ability, and gross motor classifications could significantly predict effective and non-effective communicator groups in communication function. [Subjects and Methods] This retrospective cross-sectional study included 327 children with a mean age of 10.13 ± 4.09 years. Classifications were performed by an experienced pediatric physiotherapist. [Results] Gross motor function levels showed a strong correlation with manual ability levels (r(s)=0.78). Manual ability level was strongly correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.73), particularly in quadriplegic children (r(s)=0.78). Gross motor function levels were moderately correlated with communication function levels (r(s)=0.71). Effective communicators in communication function showed more functional levels of manual ability and were determined by Gross Motor Function classifications. The variables were better at predicting ineffective communicators (91% correct) compared with effective communicators (85% correct). [Conclusion] Further studies are needed to relate these functional performance systems to the activity and participation levels as well as the quality of life, desires, and participation of the subjects. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016-12-27 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5276790/ /pubmed/28174481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3493 Text en 2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mutlu, Akmer Pistav-Akmese, Pelin Yardımcı, Bilge Nur Ogretmen, Tuncay What do the relationships between functional classification systems of children with cerebral palsy tell us? |
title | What do the relationships between functional classification systems of
children with cerebral palsy tell us? |
title_full | What do the relationships between functional classification systems of
children with cerebral palsy tell us? |
title_fullStr | What do the relationships between functional classification systems of
children with cerebral palsy tell us? |
title_full_unstemmed | What do the relationships between functional classification systems of
children with cerebral palsy tell us? |
title_short | What do the relationships between functional classification systems of
children with cerebral palsy tell us? |
title_sort | what do the relationships between functional classification systems of
children with cerebral palsy tell us? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5276790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mutluakmer whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus AT pistavakmesepelin whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus AT yardımcıbilgenur whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus AT ogretmentuncay whatdotherelationshipsbetweenfunctionalclassificationsystemsofchildrenwithcerebralpalsytellus |