Cargando…

Celecoxib and 2,5‐dimethylcelecoxib inhibit intestinal cancer growth by suppressing the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway

We previously reported that celecoxib, a selective COX‐2 inhibitor, strongly inhibited human colon cancer cell proliferation by suppressing the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway. 2,5‐Dimethylcelecoxib (DM‐celecoxib), a celecoxib analog that does not inhibit COX‐2, has also been reported to have an ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egashira, Issei, Takahashi‐Yanaga, Fumi, Nishida, Risa, Arioka, Masaki, Igawa, Kazunobu, Tomooka, Katsuhiko, Nakatsu, Yoshimichi, Tsuzuki, Teruhisa, Nakabeppu, Yusaku, Kitazono, Takanari, Sasaguri, Toshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5276826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13106
Descripción
Sumario:We previously reported that celecoxib, a selective COX‐2 inhibitor, strongly inhibited human colon cancer cell proliferation by suppressing the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway. 2,5‐Dimethylcelecoxib (DM‐celecoxib), a celecoxib analog that does not inhibit COX‐2, has also been reported to have an antitumor effect. In the present study, we elucidated whether DM‐celecoxib inhibits intestinal cancer growth, and its underlying mechanism of action. First, we compared the effect of DM‐celecoxib with that of celecoxib on the human colon cancer cell lines HCT‐116 and DLD‐1. 2,5‐Dimethylcelecoxib suppressed cell proliferation and inhibited T‐cell factor 7‐like 2 expression with almost the same strength as celecoxib. 2,5‐Dimethylcelecoxib also inhibited the T‐cell factor‐dependent transcription activity and suppressed the expression of Wnt/β‐catenin target gene products cyclin D1 and survivin. Subsequently, we compared the in vivo effects of celecoxib and DM‐celecoxib using the Mutyh (−/−) mouse model, in which oxidative stress induces multiple intestinal carcinomas. Serum concentrations of orally administered celecoxib and DM‐celecoxib elevated to the levels enough to suppress cancer cell proliferation. Repeated treatment with celecoxib and DM‐celecoxib markedly reduced the number and size of the carcinomas without showing toxicity. These results suggest that the central mechanism for the anticancer effect of celecoxib derivatives is the suppression of the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway but not the inhibition of COX‐2, and that DM‐celecoxib might be a better lead compound candidate than celecoxib for the development of novel anticancer drugs.