Cargando…
Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011
OBJECTIVES: Estimate survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the general population aged 60 and over and the effect of recommended treatments. DESIGN: Cohort study in the UK with routinely collected data between January 1987 and March 2011. SETTING: 310 general practices that contributed...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5278246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013570 |
_version_ | 1782502615906516992 |
---|---|
author | Gitsels, Lisanne A Kulinskaya, Elena Steel, Nicholas |
author_facet | Gitsels, Lisanne A Kulinskaya, Elena Steel, Nicholas |
author_sort | Gitsels, Lisanne A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Estimate survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the general population aged 60 and over and the effect of recommended treatments. DESIGN: Cohort study in the UK with routinely collected data between January 1987 and March 2011. SETTING: 310 general practices that contributed to The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. PARTICIPANTS: 4 cohorts who reached the age of 60, 65, 70, or 75 years between 1987 and 2011 included 16 744, 43 528, 73 728, and 76 392 participants, respectively. Participants with a history of AMI were matched on sex, year of birth, and general practice to 3 controls each. OUTCOME MEASURES: The hazard of all-cause mortality associated with AMI was calculated by a multilevel Cox's proportional hazards regression, adjusted for sex, year of birth, socioeconomic status, angina, heart failure, other cardiovascular conditions, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, alcohol consumption, body mass index, smoking status, coronary revascularisation, prescription of β-blockers, ACE inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, aspirin, or statins, and general practice. RESULTS: Compared with no history of AMI by age 60, 65, 70, or 75, having had 1 AMI was associated with an adjusted hazard of mortality of 1.80 (95% CI 1.60 to 2.02), 1.71 (1.59 to 1.84), 1.50 (1.42 to 1.59), or 1.45 (1.38 to 1.53), respectively, and having had multiple AMIs with a hazard of 1.92 (1.60 to 2.29), 1.87 (1.68 to 2.07), 1.66 (1.53 to 1.80), or 1.63 (1.51 to 1.76), respectively. Survival was better after statins (HR range across the 4 cohorts 0.74–0.81), β-blockers (0.79–0.85), or coronary revascularisation (in first 5 years) (0.72–0.80); unchanged after calcium-channel blockers (1.00–1.07); and worse after aspirin (1.05–1.10) or ACE inhibitors (1.10–1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The hazard of death after AMI is less than reported by previous studies, and standard treatments of aspirin or ACE inhibitors prescription may be of little benefit or even cause harm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5278246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52782462017-02-07 Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 Gitsels, Lisanne A Kulinskaya, Elena Steel, Nicholas BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: Estimate survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the general population aged 60 and over and the effect of recommended treatments. DESIGN: Cohort study in the UK with routinely collected data between January 1987 and March 2011. SETTING: 310 general practices that contributed to The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. PARTICIPANTS: 4 cohorts who reached the age of 60, 65, 70, or 75 years between 1987 and 2011 included 16 744, 43 528, 73 728, and 76 392 participants, respectively. Participants with a history of AMI were matched on sex, year of birth, and general practice to 3 controls each. OUTCOME MEASURES: The hazard of all-cause mortality associated with AMI was calculated by a multilevel Cox's proportional hazards regression, adjusted for sex, year of birth, socioeconomic status, angina, heart failure, other cardiovascular conditions, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, alcohol consumption, body mass index, smoking status, coronary revascularisation, prescription of β-blockers, ACE inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, aspirin, or statins, and general practice. RESULTS: Compared with no history of AMI by age 60, 65, 70, or 75, having had 1 AMI was associated with an adjusted hazard of mortality of 1.80 (95% CI 1.60 to 2.02), 1.71 (1.59 to 1.84), 1.50 (1.42 to 1.59), or 1.45 (1.38 to 1.53), respectively, and having had multiple AMIs with a hazard of 1.92 (1.60 to 2.29), 1.87 (1.68 to 2.07), 1.66 (1.53 to 1.80), or 1.63 (1.51 to 1.76), respectively. Survival was better after statins (HR range across the 4 cohorts 0.74–0.81), β-blockers (0.79–0.85), or coronary revascularisation (in first 5 years) (0.72–0.80); unchanged after calcium-channel blockers (1.00–1.07); and worse after aspirin (1.05–1.10) or ACE inhibitors (1.10–1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The hazard of death after AMI is less than reported by previous studies, and standard treatments of aspirin or ACE inhibitors prescription may be of little benefit or even cause harm. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5278246/ /pubmed/28119386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013570 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Gitsels, Lisanne A Kulinskaya, Elena Steel, Nicholas Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 |
title | Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 |
title_full | Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 |
title_fullStr | Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 |
title_short | Survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the UK: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 |
title_sort | survival prospects after acute myocardial infarction in the uk: a matched cohort study 1987–2011 |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5278246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gitselslisannea survivalprospectsafteracutemyocardialinfarctionintheukamatchedcohortstudy19872011 AT kulinskayaelena survivalprospectsafteracutemyocardialinfarctionintheukamatchedcohortstudy19872011 AT steelnicholas survivalprospectsafteracutemyocardialinfarctionintheukamatchedcohortstudy19872011 |