Cargando…

Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors

Field effect transistors (FET) have been widely used as transducers in electrochemical sensors for over 40 years. In this report, a FET transducer is compared with the recently proposed bipolar junction transistor (BJT) transducer. Measurements are performed on two chloride electrochemical sensors t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zafar, Sufi, Lu, Minhua, Jagtiani, Ashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5278393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41430
_version_ 1782502641315610624
author Zafar, Sufi
Lu, Minhua
Jagtiani, Ashish
author_facet Zafar, Sufi
Lu, Minhua
Jagtiani, Ashish
author_sort Zafar, Sufi
collection PubMed
description Field effect transistors (FET) have been widely used as transducers in electrochemical sensors for over 40 years. In this report, a FET transducer is compared with the recently proposed bipolar junction transistor (BJT) transducer. Measurements are performed on two chloride electrochemical sensors that are identical in all details except for the transducer device type. Comparative measurements show that the transducer choice significantly impacts the electrochemical sensor characteristics. Signal to noise ratio is 20 to 2 times greater for the BJT sensor. Sensitivity is also enhanced: BJT sensing signal changes by 10 times per pCl, whereas the FET signal changes by 8 or less times. Also, sensor calibration curves are impacted by the transducer choice. Unlike a FET sensor, the calibration curve of the BJT sensor is independent of applied voltages. Hence, a BJT sensor can make quantitative sensing measurements with minimal calibration requirements, an important characteristic for mobile sensing applications. As a demonstration for mobile applications, these BJT sensors are further investigated by measuring chloride levels in artificial human sweat for potential cystic fibrosis diagnostic use. In summary, the BJT device is demonstrated to be a superior transducer in comparison to a FET in an electrochemical sensor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5278393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52783932017-02-03 Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors Zafar, Sufi Lu, Minhua Jagtiani, Ashish Sci Rep Article Field effect transistors (FET) have been widely used as transducers in electrochemical sensors for over 40 years. In this report, a FET transducer is compared with the recently proposed bipolar junction transistor (BJT) transducer. Measurements are performed on two chloride electrochemical sensors that are identical in all details except for the transducer device type. Comparative measurements show that the transducer choice significantly impacts the electrochemical sensor characteristics. Signal to noise ratio is 20 to 2 times greater for the BJT sensor. Sensitivity is also enhanced: BJT sensing signal changes by 10 times per pCl, whereas the FET signal changes by 8 or less times. Also, sensor calibration curves are impacted by the transducer choice. Unlike a FET sensor, the calibration curve of the BJT sensor is independent of applied voltages. Hence, a BJT sensor can make quantitative sensing measurements with minimal calibration requirements, an important characteristic for mobile sensing applications. As a demonstration for mobile applications, these BJT sensors are further investigated by measuring chloride levels in artificial human sweat for potential cystic fibrosis diagnostic use. In summary, the BJT device is demonstrated to be a superior transducer in comparison to a FET in an electrochemical sensor. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5278393/ /pubmed/28134275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41430 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zafar, Sufi
Lu, Minhua
Jagtiani, Ashish
Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors
title Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors
title_full Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors
title_fullStr Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors
title_short Comparison between Field Effect Transistors and Bipolar Junction Transistors as Transducers in Electrochemical Sensors
title_sort comparison between field effect transistors and bipolar junction transistors as transducers in electrochemical sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5278393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28134275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41430
work_keys_str_mv AT zafarsufi comparisonbetweenfieldeffecttransistorsandbipolarjunctiontransistorsastransducersinelectrochemicalsensors
AT luminhua comparisonbetweenfieldeffecttransistorsandbipolarjunctiontransistorsastransducersinelectrochemicalsensors
AT jagtianiashish comparisonbetweenfieldeffecttransistorsandbipolarjunctiontransistorsastransducersinelectrochemicalsensors