Cargando…
Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
The Tonnis radiographic classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been widely used. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, a new classification system recently developed by the IHDI, is beginning to be applied to evaluate DDH with the absence of an ossi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005902 |
_version_ | 1782502714849099776 |
---|---|
author | Miao, Mingyuan Cai, Haiqing Hu, Liwei Wang, Zhigang |
author_facet | Miao, Mingyuan Cai, Haiqing Hu, Liwei Wang, Zhigang |
author_sort | Miao, Mingyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Tonnis radiographic classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been widely used. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, a new classification system recently developed by the IHDI, is beginning to be applied to evaluate DDH with the absence of an ossification center. This study aimed to validate its reliability in evaluating DDH with an ossification center and compared the 2 classifications in evaluating all DDH hips. In addition, the prediction values of the 2 classifications on clinical management selection were compared. In total, the pelvic radiographs of 212 DDH patients (318 hips) between the ages of 6 and 48 months admitted to Shanghai Children's Medical Center between 2007 and 2014 were assessed by 3 observers retrospectively using the 2 classifications. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were evaluated using the kappa method. We also assessed the correlation of the 2 radiographic classifications in terms of treatment selection. In total, 216 hips received closed reduction, 61 hips received open reduction, and 41 hips received pelvic osteotomy. Both classifications showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. However, the IHDI demonstrated more interobserver reliability, especially for evaluating DDH without an ossification center. Both classifications were found to be relevant in detecting the DDH treatment type (P < 0.01). The Tonnis classification was also relevant, especially for evaluating DDH with an ossification center. The IHDI classification exhibited good practicability in classifying the radiographic severity of DDH compared to the Tonnis classification, particularly in hips without an ossification center. Like the Tonnis classification, the IHDI classification can predict treatment plans. Therefore, the IHDI classification seems to be the upgraded version of the Tonnis classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5279095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-52790952017-02-08 Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip Miao, Mingyuan Cai, Haiqing Hu, Liwei Wang, Zhigang Medicine (Baltimore) 6200 The Tonnis radiographic classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been widely used. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, a new classification system recently developed by the IHDI, is beginning to be applied to evaluate DDH with the absence of an ossification center. This study aimed to validate its reliability in evaluating DDH with an ossification center and compared the 2 classifications in evaluating all DDH hips. In addition, the prediction values of the 2 classifications on clinical management selection were compared. In total, the pelvic radiographs of 212 DDH patients (318 hips) between the ages of 6 and 48 months admitted to Shanghai Children's Medical Center between 2007 and 2014 were assessed by 3 observers retrospectively using the 2 classifications. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were evaluated using the kappa method. We also assessed the correlation of the 2 radiographic classifications in terms of treatment selection. In total, 216 hips received closed reduction, 61 hips received open reduction, and 41 hips received pelvic osteotomy. Both classifications showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. However, the IHDI demonstrated more interobserver reliability, especially for evaluating DDH without an ossification center. Both classifications were found to be relevant in detecting the DDH treatment type (P < 0.01). The Tonnis classification was also relevant, especially for evaluating DDH with an ossification center. The IHDI classification exhibited good practicability in classifying the radiographic severity of DDH compared to the Tonnis classification, particularly in hips without an ossification center. Like the Tonnis classification, the IHDI classification can predict treatment plans. Therefore, the IHDI classification seems to be the upgraded version of the Tonnis classification. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5279095/ /pubmed/28099350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005902 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6200 Miao, Mingyuan Cai, Haiqing Hu, Liwei Wang, Zhigang Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip |
title | Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip |
title_full | Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip |
title_fullStr | Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip |
title_short | Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip |
title_sort | retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip |
topic | 6200 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005902 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miaomingyuan retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip AT caihaiqing retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip AT huliwei retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip AT wangzhigang retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip |