Cargando…

Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip

The Tonnis radiographic classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been widely used. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, a new classification system recently developed by the IHDI, is beginning to be applied to evaluate DDH with the absence of an ossi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miao, Mingyuan, Cai, Haiqing, Hu, Liwei, Wang, Zhigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005902
_version_ 1782502714849099776
author Miao, Mingyuan
Cai, Haiqing
Hu, Liwei
Wang, Zhigang
author_facet Miao, Mingyuan
Cai, Haiqing
Hu, Liwei
Wang, Zhigang
author_sort Miao, Mingyuan
collection PubMed
description The Tonnis radiographic classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been widely used. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, a new classification system recently developed by the IHDI, is beginning to be applied to evaluate DDH with the absence of an ossification center. This study aimed to validate its reliability in evaluating DDH with an ossification center and compared the 2 classifications in evaluating all DDH hips. In addition, the prediction values of the 2 classifications on clinical management selection were compared. In total, the pelvic radiographs of 212 DDH patients (318 hips) between the ages of 6 and 48 months admitted to Shanghai Children's Medical Center between 2007 and 2014 were assessed by 3 observers retrospectively using the 2 classifications. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were evaluated using the kappa method. We also assessed the correlation of the 2 radiographic classifications in terms of treatment selection. In total, 216 hips received closed reduction, 61 hips received open reduction, and 41 hips received pelvic osteotomy. Both classifications showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. However, the IHDI demonstrated more interobserver reliability, especially for evaluating DDH without an ossification center. Both classifications were found to be relevant in detecting the DDH treatment type (P < 0.01). The Tonnis classification was also relevant, especially for evaluating DDH with an ossification center. The IHDI classification exhibited good practicability in classifying the radiographic severity of DDH compared to the Tonnis classification, particularly in hips without an ossification center. Like the Tonnis classification, the IHDI classification can predict treatment plans. Therefore, the IHDI classification seems to be the upgraded version of the Tonnis classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5279095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52790952017-02-08 Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip Miao, Mingyuan Cai, Haiqing Hu, Liwei Wang, Zhigang Medicine (Baltimore) 6200 The Tonnis radiographic classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been widely used. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, a new classification system recently developed by the IHDI, is beginning to be applied to evaluate DDH with the absence of an ossification center. This study aimed to validate its reliability in evaluating DDH with an ossification center and compared the 2 classifications in evaluating all DDH hips. In addition, the prediction values of the 2 classifications on clinical management selection were compared. In total, the pelvic radiographs of 212 DDH patients (318 hips) between the ages of 6 and 48 months admitted to Shanghai Children's Medical Center between 2007 and 2014 were assessed by 3 observers retrospectively using the 2 classifications. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were evaluated using the kappa method. We also assessed the correlation of the 2 radiographic classifications in terms of treatment selection. In total, 216 hips received closed reduction, 61 hips received open reduction, and 41 hips received pelvic osteotomy. Both classifications showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. However, the IHDI demonstrated more interobserver reliability, especially for evaluating DDH without an ossification center. Both classifications were found to be relevant in detecting the DDH treatment type (P < 0.01). The Tonnis classification was also relevant, especially for evaluating DDH with an ossification center. The IHDI classification exhibited good practicability in classifying the radiographic severity of DDH compared to the Tonnis classification, particularly in hips without an ossification center. Like the Tonnis classification, the IHDI classification can predict treatment plans. Therefore, the IHDI classification seems to be the upgraded version of the Tonnis classification. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5279095/ /pubmed/28099350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005902 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 6200
Miao, Mingyuan
Cai, Haiqing
Hu, Liwei
Wang, Zhigang
Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
title Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_full Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_fullStr Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_short Retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the Tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_sort retrospective observational study comparing the international hip dysplasia institute classification with the tonnis classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip
topic 6200
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005902
work_keys_str_mv AT miaomingyuan retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT caihaiqing retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT huliwei retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT wangzhigang retrospectiveobservationalstudycomparingtheinternationalhipdysplasiainstituteclassificationwiththetonnisclassificationofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip