Cargando…

Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions

We tested an information foraging framework to characterize the mechanisms that drive active (visual) sampling behavior in decision problems that involve multiple sources of information. Experiments 1 through 3 involved participants making an absolute judgment about the direction of motion of a sing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludwig, Casimir J. H., Evens, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Psychological Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000299
_version_ 1782502780640952320
author Ludwig, Casimir J. H.
Evens, David R.
author_facet Ludwig, Casimir J. H.
Evens, David R.
author_sort Ludwig, Casimir J. H.
collection PubMed
description We tested an information foraging framework to characterize the mechanisms that drive active (visual) sampling behavior in decision problems that involve multiple sources of information. Experiments 1 through 3 involved participants making an absolute judgment about the direction of motion of a single random dot motion pattern. In Experiment 4, participants made a relative comparison between 2 motion patterns that could only be sampled sequentially. Our results show that: (a) Information (about noisy motion information) grows to an asymptotic level that depends on the quality of the information source; (b) The limited growth is attributable to unequal weighting of the incoming sensory evidence, with early samples being weighted more heavily; (c) Little information is lost once a new source of information is being sampled; and (d) The point at which the observer switches from 1 source to another is governed by online monitoring of his or her degree of (un)certainty about the sampled source. These findings demonstrate that the sampling strategy in perceptual decision-making is under some direct control by ongoing cognitive processing. More specifically, participants are able to track a measure of (un)certainty and use this information to guide their sampling behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5279461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52794612017-02-08 Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions Ludwig, Casimir J. H. Evens, David R. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Reports We tested an information foraging framework to characterize the mechanisms that drive active (visual) sampling behavior in decision problems that involve multiple sources of information. Experiments 1 through 3 involved participants making an absolute judgment about the direction of motion of a single random dot motion pattern. In Experiment 4, participants made a relative comparison between 2 motion patterns that could only be sampled sequentially. Our results show that: (a) Information (about noisy motion information) grows to an asymptotic level that depends on the quality of the information source; (b) The limited growth is attributable to unequal weighting of the incoming sensory evidence, with early samples being weighted more heavily; (c) Little information is lost once a new source of information is being sampled; and (d) The point at which the observer switches from 1 source to another is governed by online monitoring of his or her degree of (un)certainty about the sampled source. These findings demonstrate that the sampling strategy in perceptual decision-making is under some direct control by ongoing cognitive processing. More specifically, participants are able to track a measure of (un)certainty and use this information to guide their sampling behavior. American Psychological Association 2016-11-07 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5279461/ /pubmed/27819455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000299 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
spellingShingle Reports
Ludwig, Casimir J. H.
Evens, David R.
Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions
title Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions
title_full Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions
title_fullStr Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions
title_full_unstemmed Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions
title_short Information Foraging for Perceptual Decisions
title_sort information foraging for perceptual decisions
topic Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27819455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000299
work_keys_str_mv AT ludwigcasimirjh informationforagingforperceptualdecisions
AT evensdavidr informationforagingforperceptualdecisions