Cargando…

The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Among all spinal therapies, treatment of the cervical segment is the most difficult. The cervical segment is particularly sensitive to injuries and pain, and it also requires special care due to its great mobility and most delicate construction. The aim of this research was to evaluate a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haładaj, Robert, Pingot, Mariusz, Topol, Mirosław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28104903
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899454
_version_ 1782502859802148864
author Haładaj, Robert
Pingot, Mariusz
Topol, Mirosław
author_facet Haładaj, Robert
Pingot, Mariusz
Topol, Mirosław
author_sort Haładaj, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among all spinal therapies, treatment of the cervical segment is the most difficult. The cervical segment is particularly sensitive to injuries and pain, and it also requires special care due to its great mobility and most delicate construction. The aim of this research was to evaluate analgesic efficacy and improvement of active mobility of the cervical spine after traction therapy with the Saunders device and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) immediately after therapy, and in short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up in patients with cervical spondylosis. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study included 174 patients (114 women and 60 men) aged 24–67 years. The patients were divided into two randomized groups. In group I (88 subjects) traction therapy with the Saunders device was applied, and in group II (86 subjects) HILT was applied. The measurement of the range of cervical spine movement, a subjective visual scale for pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), and the Neck Disability Index-Polish Version (NDI) questionnaire were used. RESULTS: The results obtained by the Saunders and HILT methods were similar immediately after the therapy and after 4 weeks (the medium-term follow-up). However, in long-term follow-up, there was a significant increase in the maintenance of positive therapeutic effects with the HILT method. CONCLUSIONS: Both therapeutic methods improved the efficiency and demonstrated analgesic efficacy in patients with cervical spondylosis immediately and in the medium term after the therapy. HILT was more effective than the Saunders method in long-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5279870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52798702017-03-28 The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Haładaj, Robert Pingot, Mariusz Topol, Mirosław Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Among all spinal therapies, treatment of the cervical segment is the most difficult. The cervical segment is particularly sensitive to injuries and pain, and it also requires special care due to its great mobility and most delicate construction. The aim of this research was to evaluate analgesic efficacy and improvement of active mobility of the cervical spine after traction therapy with the Saunders device and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) immediately after therapy, and in short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up in patients with cervical spondylosis. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study included 174 patients (114 women and 60 men) aged 24–67 years. The patients were divided into two randomized groups. In group I (88 subjects) traction therapy with the Saunders device was applied, and in group II (86 subjects) HILT was applied. The measurement of the range of cervical spine movement, a subjective visual scale for pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), and the Neck Disability Index-Polish Version (NDI) questionnaire were used. RESULTS: The results obtained by the Saunders and HILT methods were similar immediately after the therapy and after 4 weeks (the medium-term follow-up). However, in long-term follow-up, there was a significant increase in the maintenance of positive therapeutic effects with the HILT method. CONCLUSIONS: Both therapeutic methods improved the efficiency and demonstrated analgesic efficacy in patients with cervical spondylosis immediately and in the medium term after the therapy. HILT was more effective than the Saunders method in long-term follow-up. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2017-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5279870/ /pubmed/28104903 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899454 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2017 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Haładaj, Robert
Pingot, Mariusz
Topol, Mirosław
The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Effectiveness of Cervical Spondylosis Therapy with Saunders Traction Device and High-Intensity Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effectiveness of cervical spondylosis therapy with saunders traction device and high-intensity laser therapy: a randomized controlled trial
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5279870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28104903
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.899454
work_keys_str_mv AT haładajrobert theeffectivenessofcervicalspondylosistherapywithsaunderstractiondeviceandhighintensitylasertherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pingotmariusz theeffectivenessofcervicalspondylosistherapywithsaunderstractiondeviceandhighintensitylasertherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT topolmirosław theeffectivenessofcervicalspondylosistherapywithsaunderstractiondeviceandhighintensitylasertherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haładajrobert effectivenessofcervicalspondylosistherapywithsaunderstractiondeviceandhighintensitylasertherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pingotmariusz effectivenessofcervicalspondylosistherapywithsaunderstractiondeviceandhighintensitylasertherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT topolmirosław effectivenessofcervicalspondylosistherapywithsaunderstractiondeviceandhighintensitylasertherapyarandomizedcontrolledtrial