Cargando…

Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance

Critical real-world visual search tasks such as radiology and baggage screening rely on the detection of rare targets. When targets are rare, observers search for a relatively short amount of time and have a high miss rate, a pattern of results known as the low prevalence effect. Attempts to improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peltier, Chad, Becker, Mark W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5281659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0042-3
_version_ 1782503179987976192
author Peltier, Chad
Becker, Mark W.
author_facet Peltier, Chad
Becker, Mark W.
author_sort Peltier, Chad
collection PubMed
description Critical real-world visual search tasks such as radiology and baggage screening rely on the detection of rare targets. When targets are rare, observers search for a relatively short amount of time and have a high miss rate, a pattern of results known as the low prevalence effect. Attempts to improve the search for rare targets have been unsuccessful or resulted in an increase in detections at the price of more false alarms. As an alternative to improving visual search performance through experimental manipulations, an individual differences approach found that those with higher working memory capacity were better at finding rare targets. We build on the individual differences approach and assess 141 observers’ visual working memory capacity (vWMC), vigilance, attentional control, big five personality traits, and performance in both high and low prevalence search tasks. vWMC, vigilance, attentional control, high prevalence visual search performance, and level of introversion were all significant predictors of low prevalence search accuracy, and together account for more than 50% of the variance in search performance. With the exception of vigilance, these factors are also significant predictors of reaction time; better performance was associated with longer reaction times, suggesting these factors identify observers who maintain relatively high quitting thresholds, even with low target prevalence. Our results suggest that a quick and easy-to-administer battery of tasks can identify observers who are likely to perform well in low prevalence search tasks, and these predictor variables are associated with higher quitting thresholds, leading to higher accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5281659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52816592017-02-13 Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance Peltier, Chad Becker, Mark W. Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article Critical real-world visual search tasks such as radiology and baggage screening rely on the detection of rare targets. When targets are rare, observers search for a relatively short amount of time and have a high miss rate, a pattern of results known as the low prevalence effect. Attempts to improve the search for rare targets have been unsuccessful or resulted in an increase in detections at the price of more false alarms. As an alternative to improving visual search performance through experimental manipulations, an individual differences approach found that those with higher working memory capacity were better at finding rare targets. We build on the individual differences approach and assess 141 observers’ visual working memory capacity (vWMC), vigilance, attentional control, big five personality traits, and performance in both high and low prevalence search tasks. vWMC, vigilance, attentional control, high prevalence visual search performance, and level of introversion were all significant predictors of low prevalence search accuracy, and together account for more than 50% of the variance in search performance. With the exception of vigilance, these factors are also significant predictors of reaction time; better performance was associated with longer reaction times, suggesting these factors identify observers who maintain relatively high quitting thresholds, even with low target prevalence. Our results suggest that a quick and easy-to-administer battery of tasks can identify observers who are likely to perform well in low prevalence search tasks, and these predictor variables are associated with higher quitting thresholds, leading to higher accuracy. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5281659/ /pubmed/28203633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0042-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Peltier, Chad
Becker, Mark W.
Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance
title Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance
title_full Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance
title_fullStr Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance
title_short Individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance
title_sort individual differences predict low prevalence visual search performance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5281659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0042-3
work_keys_str_mv AT peltierchad individualdifferencespredictlowprevalencevisualsearchperformance
AT beckermarkw individualdifferencespredictlowprevalencevisualsearchperformance