Cargando…

Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning

Characterizing the neural implementation of abstract conceptual representations has long been a contentious topic in cognitive science. At the heart of the debate is whether the “sensorimotor” machinery of the brain plays a central role in representing concepts, or whether the involvement of these p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Justin C., Kraemer, David J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5281667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0046-z
_version_ 1782503181718126592
author Hayes, Justin C.
Kraemer, David J. M.
author_facet Hayes, Justin C.
Kraemer, David J. M.
author_sort Hayes, Justin C.
collection PubMed
description Characterizing the neural implementation of abstract conceptual representations has long been a contentious topic in cognitive science. At the heart of the debate is whether the “sensorimotor” machinery of the brain plays a central role in representing concepts, or whether the involvement of these perceptual and motor regions is merely peripheral or epiphenomenal. The domain of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning provides an important proving ground for sensorimotor (or grounded) theories of cognition, as concepts in science and engineering courses are often taught through laboratory-based and other hands-on methodologies. In this review of the literature, we examine evidence suggesting that sensorimotor processes strengthen learning associated with the abstract concepts central to STEM pedagogy. After considering how contemporary theories have defined abstraction in the context of semantic knowledge, we propose our own explanation for how body-centered information, as computed in sensorimotor brain regions and visuomotor association cortex, can form a useful foundation upon which to build an understanding of abstract scientific concepts, such as mechanical force. Drawing from theories in cognitive neuroscience, we then explore models elucidating the neural mechanisms involved in grounding intangible concepts, including Hebbian learning, predictive coding, and neuronal recycling. Empirical data on STEM learning through hands-on instruction are considered in light of these neural models. We conclude the review by proposing three distinct ways in which the field of cognitive neuroscience can contribute to STEM learning by bolstering our understanding of how the brain instantiates abstract concepts in an embodied fashion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5281667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52816672017-02-13 Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning Hayes, Justin C. Kraemer, David J. M. Cogn Res Princ Implic Review Article Characterizing the neural implementation of abstract conceptual representations has long been a contentious topic in cognitive science. At the heart of the debate is whether the “sensorimotor” machinery of the brain plays a central role in representing concepts, or whether the involvement of these perceptual and motor regions is merely peripheral or epiphenomenal. The domain of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning provides an important proving ground for sensorimotor (or grounded) theories of cognition, as concepts in science and engineering courses are often taught through laboratory-based and other hands-on methodologies. In this review of the literature, we examine evidence suggesting that sensorimotor processes strengthen learning associated with the abstract concepts central to STEM pedagogy. After considering how contemporary theories have defined abstraction in the context of semantic knowledge, we propose our own explanation for how body-centered information, as computed in sensorimotor brain regions and visuomotor association cortex, can form a useful foundation upon which to build an understanding of abstract scientific concepts, such as mechanical force. Drawing from theories in cognitive neuroscience, we then explore models elucidating the neural mechanisms involved in grounding intangible concepts, including Hebbian learning, predictive coding, and neuronal recycling. Empirical data on STEM learning through hands-on instruction are considered in light of these neural models. We conclude the review by proposing three distinct ways in which the field of cognitive neuroscience can contribute to STEM learning by bolstering our understanding of how the brain instantiates abstract concepts in an embodied fashion. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5281667/ /pubmed/28203635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0046-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hayes, Justin C.
Kraemer, David J. M.
Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning
title Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning
title_full Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning
title_fullStr Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning
title_full_unstemmed Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning
title_short Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning
title_sort grounded understanding of abstract concepts: the case of stem learning
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5281667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28203635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0046-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hayesjustinc groundedunderstandingofabstractconceptsthecaseofstemlearning
AT kraemerdavidjm groundedunderstandingofabstractconceptsthecaseofstemlearning