Cargando…

Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this randomized clinical trial split-mouth study was to compare the postoperative pain following use of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as pulpotomy agents in carious primary molars. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-seven children aged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shafie, Leili, Barghi, Hamide, Parirokh, Masoud, Ebrahimnejad, Hamed, Nakhae, Nozar, Esmaili, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179916
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.02
_version_ 1782503306305732608
author Shafie, Leili
Barghi, Hamide
Parirokh, Masoud
Ebrahimnejad, Hamed
Nakhae, Nozar
Esmaili, Sara
author_facet Shafie, Leili
Barghi, Hamide
Parirokh, Masoud
Ebrahimnejad, Hamed
Nakhae, Nozar
Esmaili, Sara
author_sort Shafie, Leili
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this randomized clinical trial split-mouth study was to compare the postoperative pain following use of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as pulpotomy agents in carious primary molars. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-seven children aged between 6-10 years old were enrolled in this study. Each child had two cariously involved primary molar in need of pulpotomy. After caries removal and preparing access cavity in one of the carious teeth, either MTA or CEM cement was randomly used as the pulpotomy agent, while the other cariously involved primary molar tooth was capped with the other material in a separate visit. After covering the radicular pulp with one of the capping materials the teeth were permanently restored with stainless steel crown (SSC). Postoperative pain was recorded by using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (Wong-Baker FPRS) up to seven days following the treatment. Data was analyzed using the Wilcoxon, McNemar, and chi square tests. RESULTS: Forty-five patients fulfilled the treatment procedure and returned the Wong-Baker FPRS forms. Overall 65.6% of the patients reported pain irrespective of the pulpotomy agents used. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the teeth that received either MTA or CEM cement as pulpotomy agents in the first, second and the third day (P=0.805, P=0.942, P=0.705, respectively) following the procedure. The trend of the pain scores showed decreasing manner during the study period for the teeth in either groups of MTA or CEM cement. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of analgesics used following the treatment (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study showed that a majority of the children felt pain following pulpotomy and SSC placement; however, there was no significant difference in pain reported when either MTA or CEM cement was used as pulpotomy agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52823712017-02-08 Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial Shafie, Leili Barghi, Hamide Parirokh, Masoud Ebrahimnejad, Hamed Nakhae, Nozar Esmaili, Sara Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this randomized clinical trial split-mouth study was to compare the postoperative pain following use of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as pulpotomy agents in carious primary molars. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-seven children aged between 6-10 years old were enrolled in this study. Each child had two cariously involved primary molar in need of pulpotomy. After caries removal and preparing access cavity in one of the carious teeth, either MTA or CEM cement was randomly used as the pulpotomy agent, while the other cariously involved primary molar tooth was capped with the other material in a separate visit. After covering the radicular pulp with one of the capping materials the teeth were permanently restored with stainless steel crown (SSC). Postoperative pain was recorded by using Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (Wong-Baker FPRS) up to seven days following the treatment. Data was analyzed using the Wilcoxon, McNemar, and chi square tests. RESULTS: Forty-five patients fulfilled the treatment procedure and returned the Wong-Baker FPRS forms. Overall 65.6% of the patients reported pain irrespective of the pulpotomy agents used. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the teeth that received either MTA or CEM cement as pulpotomy agents in the first, second and the third day (P=0.805, P=0.942, P=0.705, respectively) following the procedure. The trend of the pain scores showed decreasing manner during the study period for the teeth in either groups of MTA or CEM cement. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of analgesics used following the treatment (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study showed that a majority of the children felt pain following pulpotomy and SSC placement; however, there was no significant difference in pain reported when either MTA or CEM cement was used as pulpotomy agents. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5282371/ /pubmed/28179916 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.02 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shafie, Leili
Barghi, Hamide
Parirokh, Masoud
Ebrahimnejad, Hamed
Nakhae, Nozar
Esmaili, Sara
Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial
title Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial
title_full Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial
title_short Postoperative Pain following Pulpotomy of Primary Molars with Two Biomaterials: A Randomized Split Mouth Clinical Trial
title_sort postoperative pain following pulpotomy of primary molars with two biomaterials: a randomized split mouth clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179916
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.02
work_keys_str_mv AT shafieleili postoperativepainfollowingpulpotomyofprimarymolarswithtwobiomaterialsarandomizedsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT barghihamide postoperativepainfollowingpulpotomyofprimarymolarswithtwobiomaterialsarandomizedsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT parirokhmasoud postoperativepainfollowingpulpotomyofprimarymolarswithtwobiomaterialsarandomizedsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT ebrahimnejadhamed postoperativepainfollowingpulpotomyofprimarymolarswithtwobiomaterialsarandomizedsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT nakhaenozar postoperativepainfollowingpulpotomyofprimarymolarswithtwobiomaterialsarandomizedsplitmouthclinicaltrial
AT esmailisara postoperativepainfollowingpulpotomyofprimarymolarswithtwobiomaterialsarandomizedsplitmouthclinicaltrial