Cargando…

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the dentine-sealer interface in three different sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty extracted human single-rooted teeth were prepared using ProTaper rotary files and were randomly divided into three groups (n=10)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadian, Fatemeh, Farahanimastary, Farzad, Dibaji, Fatemeh, Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179922
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.08
_version_ 1782503307752767488
author Mohammadian, Fatemeh
Farahanimastary, Farzad
Dibaji, Fatemeh
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
author_facet Mohammadian, Fatemeh
Farahanimastary, Farzad
Dibaji, Fatemeh
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
author_sort Mohammadian, Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the dentine-sealer interface in three different sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty extracted human single-rooted teeth were prepared using ProTaper rotary files and were randomly divided into three groups (n=10) including BC Sealer, AH-Plus and Dorifill. The root canals were filled with cold lateral condensation technique and stored for 7 days in 100% humidity at 37(°)C. Cross sections were prepared from the coronal, middle, and apical sections of the roots. Then SEM images were taken and the width of gaps was measured by software. Sectional images were evaluated by two endodontists. Data were analyzed using two- and one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The mean gap width was significantly lower in coronal area in BC Sealer group compared to Dorifill (P=0.043) and likewise in AH-Plus group compared to Dorifill (P=0.018). There was no significant difference between BC Sealer and AH-Plus group in this area (P=0.923). No significant difference was detected in apical and middle zones among three sealers (P=0.367 and 0.643, respectively). Dentine-sealer interface showed no significant difference in three sealers in the apical area (P=0.051), but dentine-BC Sealer interface was better than AH-Plus in middle and coronal areas, and both outperformed Dorifill (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: BC Sealer and AH-Plus had less gaps than Dorifill in coronal area. In addition, BC Sealer had better dentine interface in middle and coronal area compared to AH-Plus, and both performed better than Dorifill. Reverse relationship was observed between the mean gap width and dentine-sealer interface quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52823772017-02-08 Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers Mohammadian, Fatemeh Farahanimastary, Farzad Dibaji, Fatemeh Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the dentine-sealer interface in three different sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty extracted human single-rooted teeth were prepared using ProTaper rotary files and were randomly divided into three groups (n=10) including BC Sealer, AH-Plus and Dorifill. The root canals were filled with cold lateral condensation technique and stored for 7 days in 100% humidity at 37(°)C. Cross sections were prepared from the coronal, middle, and apical sections of the roots. Then SEM images were taken and the width of gaps was measured by software. Sectional images were evaluated by two endodontists. Data were analyzed using two- and one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The mean gap width was significantly lower in coronal area in BC Sealer group compared to Dorifill (P=0.043) and likewise in AH-Plus group compared to Dorifill (P=0.018). There was no significant difference between BC Sealer and AH-Plus group in this area (P=0.923). No significant difference was detected in apical and middle zones among three sealers (P=0.367 and 0.643, respectively). Dentine-sealer interface showed no significant difference in three sealers in the apical area (P=0.051), but dentine-BC Sealer interface was better than AH-Plus in middle and coronal areas, and both outperformed Dorifill (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: BC Sealer and AH-Plus had less gaps than Dorifill in coronal area. In addition, BC Sealer had better dentine interface in middle and coronal area compared to AH-Plus, and both performed better than Dorifill. Reverse relationship was observed between the mean gap width and dentine-sealer interface quality. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5282377/ /pubmed/28179922 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.08 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammadian, Fatemeh
Farahanimastary, Farzad
Dibaji, Fatemeh
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers
title Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers
title_full Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers
title_fullStr Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers
title_short Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer-Dentine Interface of Three Sealers
title_sort scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the sealer-dentine interface of three sealers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179922
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.08
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadianfatemeh scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofthesealerdentineinterfaceofthreesealers
AT farahanimastaryfarzad scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofthesealerdentineinterfaceofthreesealers
AT dibajifatemeh scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofthesealerdentineinterfaceofthreesealers
AT kharazifardmohammadjavad scanningelectronmicroscopicevaluationofthesealerdentineinterfaceofthreesealers