Cargando…

Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers

INTRODUCTION: Vertical root fracture inevitably leads to tooth extraction. Thus, root filling with obturating materials and sealers that can reinforce the tooth would be an ideal way to reduce fracture in root treated teeth. This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of roots following the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dibaji, Fatemeh, Afkhami, Farzaneh, Bidkhori, Babak, Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179924
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.10
_version_ 1782503308177440768
author Dibaji, Fatemeh
Afkhami, Farzaneh
Bidkhori, Babak
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
author_facet Dibaji, Fatemeh
Afkhami, Farzaneh
Bidkhori, Babak
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
author_sort Dibaji, Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vertical root fracture inevitably leads to tooth extraction. Thus, root filling with obturating materials and sealers that can reinforce the tooth would be an ideal way to reduce fracture in root treated teeth. This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of roots following the application of different sealers including Epiphany, iRoot sealer and AH-plus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty extracted human single-canal premolars without caries, curvature or cracks were used in this study. Tooth crowns were cut to yield 13-mm-long roots. Five roots were put in the negative control group and were left unprepared. Forty-five canals were prepared using ProTaper rotary files up to F3 and were then randomly divided into three groups based on the sealer type (n=15). The root canals were filled using cold lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha and AH-Plus sealer, gutta-percha and iRoot sealer and Resilon and Epiphany sealer, in groups one to three, respectively. The roots were then mounted in acrylic molds for fracture resistance testing and subjected to compressive load at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min until fracture. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The mean fracture resistance was 673.38±170.42 N in AH-Plus, 562.00±184.68 N in iRoot, 708.03±228.05 N in Resilon and 592.59±117.29 N in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between the experimental groups and the negative control group (P=0.26). CONCLUSION: Application of AH-Plus, bioceramic and Resilon sealers did not change the fracture resistance of roots compared to that of unprepared root canals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52823792017-02-08 Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers Dibaji, Fatemeh Afkhami, Farzaneh Bidkhori, Babak Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Vertical root fracture inevitably leads to tooth extraction. Thus, root filling with obturating materials and sealers that can reinforce the tooth would be an ideal way to reduce fracture in root treated teeth. This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of roots following the application of different sealers including Epiphany, iRoot sealer and AH-plus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty extracted human single-canal premolars without caries, curvature or cracks were used in this study. Tooth crowns were cut to yield 13-mm-long roots. Five roots were put in the negative control group and were left unprepared. Forty-five canals were prepared using ProTaper rotary files up to F3 and were then randomly divided into three groups based on the sealer type (n=15). The root canals were filled using cold lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha and AH-Plus sealer, gutta-percha and iRoot sealer and Resilon and Epiphany sealer, in groups one to three, respectively. The roots were then mounted in acrylic molds for fracture resistance testing and subjected to compressive load at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min until fracture. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The mean fracture resistance was 673.38±170.42 N in AH-Plus, 562.00±184.68 N in iRoot, 708.03±228.05 N in Resilon and 592.59±117.29 N in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between the experimental groups and the negative control group (P=0.26). CONCLUSION: Application of AH-Plus, bioceramic and Resilon sealers did not change the fracture resistance of roots compared to that of unprepared root canals. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5282379/ /pubmed/28179924 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.10 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dibaji, Fatemeh
Afkhami, Farzaneh
Bidkhori, Babak
Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers
title Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers
title_full Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers
title_fullStr Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers
title_short Fracture Resistance of Roots after Application of Different Sealers
title_sort fracture resistance of roots after application of different sealers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28179924
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.10
work_keys_str_mv AT dibajifatemeh fractureresistanceofrootsafterapplicationofdifferentsealers
AT afkhamifarzaneh fractureresistanceofrootsafterapplicationofdifferentsealers
AT bidkhoribabak fractureresistanceofrootsafterapplicationofdifferentsealers
AT kharazifardmohammadjavad fractureresistanceofrootsafterapplicationofdifferentsealers