Cargando…

Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer

Chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have changed since the introduction of FOLFIRINOX. Due to toxicity, dosage and number of applied cycles are limited. In analogy to chemotherapy strategies in colon cancer we used a scheme of induction, maintenance and re-induction the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hann, Alexander, Bohle, Wolfram, Egger, Jan, Zoller, Wolfram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41549
_version_ 1782503329288421376
author Hann, Alexander
Bohle, Wolfram
Egger, Jan
Zoller, Wolfram
author_facet Hann, Alexander
Bohle, Wolfram
Egger, Jan
Zoller, Wolfram
author_sort Hann, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have changed since the introduction of FOLFIRINOX. Due to toxicity, dosage and number of applied cycles are limited. In analogy to chemotherapy strategies in colon cancer we used a scheme of induction, maintenance and re-induction therapy in PDAC to alleviate such toxicities and increase the number of applied cycles. Here we report first experiences with this approach. Data of all patients who received FOLFIRINOX for metastatic or locally advanced PDAC in our center using induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy from 2011 until November 2016 was collected and analyzed retrospectively. Progression free survival was assessed starting induction therapy until progressive disease (PD) during maintenance or treatment pause (PFS1) and until progression during re-induction therapy (PFS2). 13 patients received induction therapy which was followed by maintenance therapy. Re-induction due to PD during therapy was applied in 11 patients. The median PFS1 was 10.6 months (95% CI; 6.7–14.4), PFS2 was 14.1 months (95% CI; 8.2–19.9) and overall survival was 18.3 months (95% CI; 14.8–21.8). The use of FOLFIRINOX as induction, followed by maintenance and re-induction therapy in case of PD is feasible in the treatment of PDAC and might lead to a prolonged PFS with less toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5282479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-52824792017-02-03 Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer Hann, Alexander Bohle, Wolfram Egger, Jan Zoller, Wolfram Sci Rep Article Chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have changed since the introduction of FOLFIRINOX. Due to toxicity, dosage and number of applied cycles are limited. In analogy to chemotherapy strategies in colon cancer we used a scheme of induction, maintenance and re-induction therapy in PDAC to alleviate such toxicities and increase the number of applied cycles. Here we report first experiences with this approach. Data of all patients who received FOLFIRINOX for metastatic or locally advanced PDAC in our center using induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy from 2011 until November 2016 was collected and analyzed retrospectively. Progression free survival was assessed starting induction therapy until progressive disease (PD) during maintenance or treatment pause (PFS1) and until progression during re-induction therapy (PFS2). 13 patients received induction therapy which was followed by maintenance therapy. Re-induction due to PD during therapy was applied in 11 patients. The median PFS1 was 10.6 months (95% CI; 6.7–14.4), PFS2 was 14.1 months (95% CI; 8.2–19.9) and overall survival was 18.3 months (95% CI; 14.8–21.8). The use of FOLFIRINOX as induction, followed by maintenance and re-induction therapy in case of PD is feasible in the treatment of PDAC and might lead to a prolonged PFS with less toxicity. Nature Publishing Group 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5282479/ /pubmed/28139684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41549 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Hann, Alexander
Bohle, Wolfram
Egger, Jan
Zoller, Wolfram
Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
title Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
title_full Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
title_short Feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
title_sort feasibility of alternating induction and maintenance chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28139684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep41549
work_keys_str_mv AT hannalexander feasibilityofalternatinginductionandmaintenancechemotherapyinpancreaticcancer
AT bohlewolfram feasibilityofalternatinginductionandmaintenancechemotherapyinpancreaticcancer
AT eggerjan feasibilityofalternatinginductionandmaintenancechemotherapyinpancreaticcancer
AT zollerwolfram feasibilityofalternatinginductionandmaintenancechemotherapyinpancreaticcancer